895.01
Short title.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 54
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Allocco v. City of Coral Gables
Allocco v. City of Coral Gables (2002)
“; count VI (second), violation of Florida’s Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) act, Fla. Stat. §§ 895.01 et seq. (against UM); count VII, violation of due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment through a deprivation of a property and liberty…”
Evans v. State (2008)
“See § 895.01, Fla. Stat. (1995). [1] The defendant was convicted of nine counts, three counts being substantive criminal offenses and six counts being conspiracy to commit criminal offenses.”
Sreenivasan Asokan, Chakravarthy Raghavan, Nanni Pidikiti, Rakesh Parekh, Ram Reddy, Madhubala Reddy, Rodger Lodge, Anur (2017)
“The First Amended Complaint alleged several causes of action: Count I alleged a claim under Florida's RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization) Act, Fla. Stat. §§ 895.01 - 895.06. Count II alleged a claim for common law unfair competition.”
Marill Alarm Systems, Inc. v. Equity Funding Corp. (In Re Marill Alarm Systems, Inc.) (1987)
“The bankruptcy court held that defendants/appellants violated the Florida RICO statute, Fla.Stat. §§ 895.01 et seq., by their scheme to charge usurious interest on a loan to plaintiffs/appellees.”
Jankovich v. Bowen (1994)
“Fla.Stat. §§ 895.01 et seq.; A.R.S. §§ 44-2001 and 44-2002.”
Nicor International Corp. v. El Paso Corp. (2003)
“Count TV Fails as a Matter of Law In Count IV of the Second Amended Complaint, Nicor and Carib claim that Coastal has engaged in racketeering activity, in violation of Florida’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), Fla. Stat. § 895.01 et seq. 16 Nicor and…”
McKay v. State (2008)
“The charges included offenses under the Florida Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act, section 895.01, Florida Statutes (1995), and conspiracy to violate RICO.”
Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. Morgan Tire & Auto, Inc. (1996)
“411 , The Florida Racketeering Influence and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), Fla.Stat. § 895.01, and under Florida common law for tortious interference with business relationships and conspiracy.”
Nerline Horace-Manasse v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2013)
“2003) (interpreting Florida’s criminal RICO Act, Fla. Stat. § 895.01 et seq.) * Contrary to Horace-Manasse’s arguments, the Florida Supreme Court has said — post-N.”
Granados Quinones v. Swiss Bank Corp. (1987)
“See §§ 895.01 to 895.09, Fla. Stat. (1985). When sued on these charges in Dade County, Granados filed a motion to dismiss based upon the translation of a clause in the original loan agreement with Paris Bank.”
In Re Stan. Jury Instr. in Criminal Cases (1989)
“F.S. 895.01(3) "Enterprise" means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust, union chartered under the laws of Florida, or other legal entity, or any unchartered union, association, or group of individuals associated in fact although not a…”
Palm Beach County Environmental Coalition v. Florida (2009)
“§ 1961 , and the State RICO Act, § 895.01, Fla. Stat. (1979), by Palm Beach County.”
— 895.01(3) — 1 case
In Re Stan. Jury Instr. in Criminal Cases (1989)
“F.S. 895.01(3) "Enterprise" means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust, union chartered under the laws of Florida, or other legal entity, or any unchartered union, association, or group of individuals associated in fact although not a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.