CASTILLO, v. STATE, 254 So. 3d 477 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. . . .

ESTATE OF WILLIAMS, Jr. III, S. v. CITY OF MILWAUKEE,, 274 F. Supp. 3d 860 (E.D. Wis. 2017)

. . . causation. 4.6 Wrongful Death Plaintiffs’ wrongful death claim is made pursuant to Wisconsin Statute § 895.03 . . . Stat. § 895.03. . . .

GODINEZ, v. STATE, 217 So. 3d 103 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .” § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . So, to convict a defendant of racketeering under section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes, the State must . . .

CASTILLO, v. STATE, 213 So. 3d 930 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

MATHIS, v. STATE, 208 So. 3d 158 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . . § 895.03, Fla. Stat. . . . Legislature intended to remove knowledge or mens rea as an element of the offense outlined in section 895.03 . . . ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur. . § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (2013). . § 849.091(1), Fla. . . .

GODINEZ, v. STATE, 192 So. 3d 1289 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See §§ 895.02(4), 895.03(3), Fla. . . .

NOEL, v. STATE v., 191 So. 3d 370 (Fla. 2016)

. . . . §§ 812.014(2), 895.03(4), . 895.04(1), 775.082(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

CASTILLO, v. STATE, 170 So. 3d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Pursuant to the Florida RICO statute, section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes (2007): It is unlawful for . . .

KINGLAND ESTATES, LTD. v. DAVIS,, 170 So. 3d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Count I seeks relief under section 895.03 of the Florida Statutes (Florida’s RICO statute); Count II . . . seeks relief under section 895.03(4) (for RICO conspiracy); Count III claims intentional infliction of . . . State, 158 So.3d 712, 721-22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), which explains: Section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes . . . See § 895.03(4), Fla. . . . Stat. (2014) (making it illegal to conspire to violate sections 895.03(1), (2), or (3)). . . . .

DE LA OSA, v. STATE, 158 So. 3d 712 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The Statutory Provisions at Issue Section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes (2003), the substantive RICO charge . . . Section 895.02, Florida Statutes (2003), defines the terms contained in section 895.03(3) and (4): • . . . unlawful for any person to conspire or endeavor to violate any of the provisions of ... subsection (3). § 895.03 . . . To prove a substantive racketeering charge under section 895.03(3), the State must prove the defendant . . . con-spirting] to commit” enumerated crimes, the State can establish a substantive RICO charge under section 895.03 . . .

STATE v. REYAN,, 145 So. 3d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Erika Reyan was charged by Information with a single count of racketeering in violation of section 895.03 . . . directly or indirectly, in such enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of s. 895.03 . . . engaged in a conspiracy (together with uncharged co-conspirators) to commit RICO in violation of section 895.03 . . . THE RELEVANT STATUTORY PROVISIONS Sections 895.03(3) and (4), Florida Statutes (2003), referred to as . . . unlawfully and feloniously agree, conspire, combine, or confederate with each other... to violate Section 895.03 . . .

NOEL, v. STATE, 127 So. 3d 769 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . §§ 812.014(2), 895.03(4), 895.04(1), 775.082(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .

TEMPAY, INC. v. BILTRES STAFFING OF TAMPA BAY, LLC, a I. PFG a, 945 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (M.D. Fla. 2013)

. . . Section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes, provides that "[i]t is unlawful for any person employed by, or associated . . .

L. VASQUEZ, v. STATE, 111 So. 3d 273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See §§ 895.02(1), 895.03(3), (4), 893.13(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008-09). We have jurisdiction. . . .

THOMAS, v. STATE, 125 So. 3d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . State, 34 So.3d 44, 47-48 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); see also § 895.03, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

A. GAUTREAUX, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . In count two of the information, Gau-treaux was charged with racketeering pursuant to section 895.03( . . . In count three, he was charged with conspiracy to commit racketeering pursuant to section 895.03(4), . . .

J. CHAMBLEE, v. STATE, 93 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . . §§ 895.02(1), (3)-(4) and 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (2008); State v. . . .

SANCHEZ, v. STATE, 89 So. 3d 912 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Sanchez was charged with racketeering, § 895.03(3), Fla. . . . Stat. (2006), and conspiracy to commit racketeering, § 895.03(4). . . . To convict an accused of racketeering under section 895.03(3), the State must prove that he engaged in . . . See § 895.03; Mese, 824 So.2d at 911 n. 2; Di Sangro, 422 So.2d at 15; State v. . . . We now turn to Sanchez’s conviction for conspiracy to commit racketeering under section 895.03(4). . . .

BELLO, v. JOHNSON, a, 442 F. App'x 477 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . §§ 895.03, 812.014. . . .

GERMAINE, v. ST. GERMAIN,, 435 F. App'x 530 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 895.03; Johnson v. ABC Ins. Co., 193 Wis.2d 35, 532 N.W.2d 130, 133-34 (1995). . . . Stat. § 895.03; Schnabl v. Ford Motor Co., 54 Wis.2d 345, 195 N.W.2d 602, 607 (1972). . . .

R. GRAY, v. NOVELL, INC. SCO X, 412 F. App'x 199 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 895.03(3) (same); Fla. Stat. § 817.034(4)(a) (requiring a scheme to defraud). . . .

NICHOLAS, v. STATE, 47 So. 3d 297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 893.135(l)(b)(l)(c), (5); § 895.03(3), (4), Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

VARGAS, v. STATE, 34 So. 3d 44 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . (Crim.) 26.7 (emphasis added); see also § 895.03(3), Fla. . . . (Crim.) 26.8 (emphasis added); see also § 895.03(4), Fla. . . . 2004) (“It is unlawful for any person to conspire or endeavor to violate any of the provisions of [§ 895.03 . . .

SANTIAGO, v. STATE, 23 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See § 895.03(3), (4), Fla. Stat. (2006). We conclude Mr. . . .

BAKER, v. STATE, 990 So. 2d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . The state charged appellant with violating the racketeering statute, see § 895.03, Fla. . . .

DOORBAL, v. STATE v. A., 983 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2008)

. . . See Lugo, 845 So.2d at 97; see also § 895.03, Fla. . . .

DEONARINE, v. STATE, 967 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes (2001) provides: “It is unlawful for any person employed by, or associated . . .

K. TOWNSHEND, v. STATE, 965 So. 2d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (2003). . § 817.568(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003). .§ 812.014(2)(c)l., Fla. . . .

STATE v. RUBIO,, 967 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 2007)

. . . The counts were: (1) racketeering, in violation of section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes (2002); (2) conspiracy . . . to commit racketeering, in violation of section 895.03(4), Florida Statutes (2002); (3-55) Medicaid . . . Racketeering The defendants were charged with violating section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes (2002) (the . . . defendants were also charged with conspiracy to commit racketeering, which is prohibited by section 895.03 . . .

ESTATE HEISER, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, D. v., 466 F. Supp. 2d 229 (D.C. Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 895.03, 895.04(1). . . .

STATE v. FERNANDEZ,, 927 So. 2d 939 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . intellectual property offenses, forgery, bribery, and unlawful compensation in violation of sections 895.03 . . .

STATE v. RUBIO, B., 917 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . charged all defendants with racketeering and conspiracy to commit racketeering in violation of section 895.03 . . .

GHANEM, v. STATE, 910 So. 2d 434 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: It is unlawful for any person employed by, or associated . . .

DIAZ, v. STATE, 910 So. 2d 894 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . violation of the Racketeer Influenced Corruption Organization Act as charged against appellant is section 895.03 . . .

SPENCE Co. v. REGIONS HOSPITAL,, 384 F. Supp. 2d 1313 (W.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . . §§ 895.03 and 895.04 for their loss of Alyssa’s society and companionship. . . .

PIZZO, v. STATE, 910 So. 2d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . Pizzo with conspiracy to commit racketeering in violation of section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1997), . . . Pizzo with racketeering in violation of section 895.03(3), which provides, “It is unlawful for any person . . .

STATE v. OTTE,, 887 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 2004)

. . . is whether violations of Florida’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) statute, § 895.03 . . . Otte with racketeering and conspiracy to commit racketeering in violation of Florida’s RICO statute, § 895.03 . . . See § 895.03, Fla. Stat. (1999). . . .

FLORIDA EVERGREEN FOLIAGE v. E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a, 336 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . State, 845 So.2d 74, 96 n. 39 (Fla.2003) (“Flori-da['s] RICO statute, section 895.03, Florida Statutes . . .

PALMAS Y BAMBU, S. A. a S. A. a v. E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS COMPANY, INC. a, 881 So. 2d 565 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . .” § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (1985). . . . The issue before us is whether, within the meaning of section 895.03(3), the defendant can be both the . . . Basing our decision on the clear language of section 895.03(3) and on a series of cases which construe . . . Section 895.03(3) is the counterpart to section 772.103(3), which provides for civil remedies for criminal . . .

NICOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION a k a v. EL PASO CORPORATION f k a El, 318 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (S.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . Section 895.03 of the Florida Statutes makes it unlawful for any person associated with any enterprise . . . or participate, directly or indirectly, in such an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering. § 895.03 . . .

JACKSON, a k a v. STATE, 858 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . 895.08(3), Florida Statutes (1997), and conspiracy to commit racketeering in violation of subsection 895.03 . . . Under subsection 895.03(3), Florida Statutes, “It is unlawful for any person employed by, or associated . . . See § 895.03(4), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .

STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- SUBMISSION, 850 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 2003)

. . . on RICO offenses 26.2 RICO — USE OR INVESTMENT OF PROCEEDS FROM PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY § 895.03 . . . 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). 26.3 RICO — USE OR INVESTMENT OF PROCEEDS FROM COLLECTION OF UNLAWFUL DEBT § 895.03 . . . Fla. 1st DCA 1983). 26.4 RICO — ACQUISITION OR MAINTENANCE THROUGH PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY § 895.03 . . . 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). 26.5 RICO — ACQUISITION OR MAINTENANCE THROUGH COLLECTION OF UNLAWFUL DEBT § 895.03 . . . 413 So.2d 798 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). 26.8 CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY § 895.03 . . .

ELLINGTON, v. STATE, 841 So. 2d 646 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . counts of racketeering and one count of conspiracy to commit racketeering in contravention of section 895.03 . . .

LUGO, v. STATE, 845 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2003)

. . . See § 895.03, Fla. Slat. (1995). . . . . See §§ 895.02-895.03, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . . The substantive Florida RICO statute, section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1993), is patterned after its . . . See § 895.03, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . . .

STATE v. FRATELLO, 835 So. 2d 312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 895.03(3) Fla. . . .

ALLOCCO, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES, A A, 221 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (S.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . . § 895.03(3). . . .

MESE, v. STATE, 824 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . evidence at trial to support Mese’s conviction for RICO conspiracy- Florida’s RICO statute, section 895.03 . . .

BLACK, v. STATE, 819 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . participating in the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering in violation of section 895.03 . . . in the affairs of an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of section 895.03 . . . It did not err in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal as to the section 895.03(3) and (4) counts . . .

STATE v. GARZA,, 807 So. 2d 790 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . §§ 895.03(3), 777.04(3), and 893.135(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). . . . .

STATE v. W. TYRRELL,, 807 So. 2d 122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (1999). . § 796.05, Fla. Stat. (1999). . § 921.002, et seq., Fla. . . .

EIGHT HUNDRED, INC. v. STATE, 781 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . warrant, the circuit court in Lee County found probable cause that there had been violations of sections 895.03 . . .

GROSS, Jr. v. STATE, 765 So. 2d 39 (Fla. 2000)

. . . Specifically, section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes (1993), makes it “unlawful for any person employed . . .

BEJERANO, v. STATE, 760 So. 2d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 895.03(3), Florida Statutes. . . .

STATE v. MARKS, P. A., 758 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . . § 895.03(3)(1994). . . .

WEINACHT, v. STATE, 744 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes (1993), provides: “It is unlawful for any person employed by, or . . .

JOHNSON ENTERPRISES OF JACKSONVILLE, INC. a v. FPL GROUP, INC. a FPL a a, 162 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 1998)

. . . Stat. ch, 895.03(1), (2), (3), and (4) (1997). . . .

STATE v. E. GUSOW,, 724 So. 2d 135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . the trial court dismissed count 2 on the basis this count did not specify which subsection of section 895.03 . . . 2 of the instant information alleged an enterprise and specifically tracked the language of section 895.03 . . .

AMOS, v. STATE, 711 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Charles Amos appeals from his convictions of one count of racketeering - under section 895.03, Florida . . .

A. VAUGHN, v. STATE, 711 So. 2d 64 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . unlawfully conducting a business enterprise through a pattern of racketeering, in violation of sections 895.03 . . .

R. SHURMAN, v. STATE, 703 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 895.03(3), Fla. Stat (1987). . Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979). . . .

BRADENTON GROUP, INC. v. DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA,, 701 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . The complaint sought relief under civil RICO based on alleged violations of section 895.03, Florida Statutes . . .

STATE v. SOBIECK,, 701 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . §§ 895.03(3), 895.02(3) and 895(4), Fla. Slat. (1995). . § 932.701-707, Fla. Slat. (1996). . U.S. . . .

MASON, v. STATE, 698 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . We affirm appellant’s convictions of one count of racketeering under section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes . . .

STATE v. R. GONZALEZ,, 685 So. 2d 934 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . Appellee was charged by information with one count of RICO in violation of section 895.03(3), Florida . . .

STATE v. JACKSON,, 677 So. 2d 938 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . of section 817.03(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1993); one count of racketeering, in violation of section 895.03 . . . state failed to plead a prima facie showing of the existence of an enterprise as required by section 895.03 . . . The Florida RICO (Florida Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization) Act, at section 895.03(3), Florida . . .

STATE v. S. NUCKOLLS, III,, 677 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . indictment or information under Chapters 812, 817, and 831, Florida Statutes and contrary to Florida Statute 895.03 . . . racketeering activity, within the meaning of Florida Statute 895.02(1) and contrary to Florida Statute 895.03 . . . while concealing their doings with forged and falsified documents, all contrary to Florida Statutes 895.03 . . . PETERSON, C.J., and COBB, J., concur. . § 895.03(3), Fla.Stat. . § 895.03(4), Fla.Stat. . § 817.036, . . .

L. RUTH, a k a a k a M. a k a a k a E. a k a M. v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS,, 661 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . intended for use in the course of, derived from or realized through conduct in violation of Section 895.03 . . . Section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1989), sets forth prohibited activities under the Florida RICO Act. . . . making due provision for the rights of innocent persons, enjoin violations of the provisions of s. 895.03 . . . same type of endeavor as the enterprise in which he was engaged in violation of the provisions of s. 895.03 . . . conducting the affairs of the corporation, has authorized or engaged in conduct in violation of s. 895.03 . . .

STATE v. RIVERS,, 660 So. 2d 1360 (Fla. 1995)

. . . . § 895.03, Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 796.07(3), Fla.Stat. (1991). . § 796.07(2)(d), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . . .

L. SCHUMMER, v. STATE, 654 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Schummer appeals his multiple convictions for two counts of violating the Florida RICO statute, sections 895.03 . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 652 So. 2d 877 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . ENTERPRISE Count fifty-nine of the information charged Brown with violating section 895.03(3), Florida . . .

E. CLARK, v. STATE, 645 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . Clark was charged with violating sections 895.03(3) and (4), Florida Statutes (1991), of the Florida . . .

STATE v. RIVERS,, 643 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . of the intercepted communications, the State charged all of the appellees with violations of section 895.03 . . .

BORDO, INC. v. STATE, 627 So. 2d 561 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . See § 895.03(3) and (4), Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

R. HARVEY, v. STATE, 617 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Deborah Harvey appeals her conviction of violating section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1987), Florida’s . . . The state’s three-count amended information alleges in the first count that Harvey violated section 895.03 . . .

SHIMEK, Jr. v. STATE, 610 So. 2d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . The fifth count charged a violation of the Florida RICO Act, section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1987), . . . Section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1987), provides in part: (1) It is unlawful for any person who has . . .

K. BISSELL, v. STATE STATE v. F. DONOHUE,, 605 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . . § 895.03(3), one count of engaging in racketeering activity; § 895.03(4), one count of conspiracy to . . .

STATE v. LUCAS,, 600 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 1992)

. . . Section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1985), under which the respondents were charged, states in pertinent . . .

WILSON, v. STATE, 596 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Section 895.03(3) provides that it is unlawful for any person employed by or associated with an enterprise . . .

NAPOLI, v. STATE, 596 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . See §§ 895.03 & 895.02(3), Fla.Stat. (1987); and Boyd v. . . .

CHERRY, v. STATE, 592 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . The court adjudicated the defendant guilty and sentenced him as follows: One Count of Racketeering § 895.03 . . .

BROWN, v. STATE, 585 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Racketeering, § 895.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1987); Burglary, three (3) counts, § 810.02, Fla.Stat. (1987); . . .

POLAKOFF, v. STATE, 586 So. 2d 385 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . involves the inter-relationship of section 687.071(3), Florida Statutes, of the usury statute and section 895.03 . . . Count 1, in effect, charges the defendant with a violation of the RICO Act (section 895.03(3), Florida . . . However, section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes, in essence makes it unlawful for any person to conduct . . . Section 895.03(3), the basis for Count 5, makes it a first degree felony for a person employed by, or . . . Section 895.03(3) requires that the defendant be employed by, or associated with, an enterprise when . . .

J. DeLISI DeLISI, v. STATE, 585 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Terry Johnson (a codefendant not a party to this appeal) with: (I) violation of the RICO Act, section 895.03 . . .

AVIRGAN v. HULL, K. Sr. AVIRGAN v. HULL, W. K. AVIRGAN P. SHEEHAN v. HULL, W. Sr. AVIRGAN P. SHEEHAN v. HULL, W. Sr., 932 F.2d 1572 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 895.03. . . .

C. HOWARD, v. STATE, 579 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Howard, individually, was the “enterprise” for purposes of section 895.03(3), Fla. Stat. (1985). . . .

RODRIGUEZ No. B, v. BANCO INDUSTRIAL VENEZUELA, C. A., 576 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 895.03(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . . making due provision for the rights of innocent persons, enjoin violations of the provisions of s. 895.03 . . .

SEAGOOD TRADING CORPORATION, v. JERRICO, INC. S S s,, 924 F.2d 1555 (11th Cir. 1991)

. . . . § 895.03(3)-(4) (1989), respectively. . . .

PRIETO, v. STATE, 573 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 895.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1985). . . . .

BOYD, v. STATE, 578 So. 2d 718 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . statute does not invariably require that criminal conduct be conducted through an "enterprise,” see § 895.03 . . .

STATE v. BAIRD, Jr., 572 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 1990)

. . . After a jury trial, he was found guilty of three counts of racketeering in violation of section 895.03 . . .

R. DONOVAN, v. STATE, 572 So. 2d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Four counts of racketeering (RICO), sections 895.02(3), 895.03(1), Florida Statutes (1987): 30 years . . . The heart of the RICO offense is contained in section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1987), and may be summarized . . . Section 895.03 does not make each incident of use or investment of proceeds of the same pattern of racketeering . . .

TINWOOD N. V. v. SUN BANKS, INC., 570 So. 2d 955 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . .-02(4), 895.03, Fla.Stat. (1985). In a case somewhat analogous to this one, State v. . . .

KNIGHT, v. E. F. HUTTON AND CO. INC., 750 F. Supp. 1109 (M.D. Fla. 1990)

. . . (1987) as reading: Any person who is injured by reason of any violation of the provision of Chapter 895.03 . . . and convincing evidence that it has been injured by reason of any violation of the provision of s. 895.03 . . .

FLANAGAN, v. STATE, 566 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . conviction of one count of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), section 895.03 . . .

HOLLEY, v. STATE, 564 So. 2d 595 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . jury and convicted of one count of RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act), section 895.03 . . .

ZICCARDI, v. STROTHER,, 570 So. 2d 1319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . “Any person who is injured by reason of any violation of the provisions of s. 895.03 shall have a cause . . .

L. CRAVER, v. STATE, 561 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Craver was tried by a jury and convicted of one count of racketeering in violation of section 895.03( . . . these circumstances, the appellant cannot be prosecuted or convicted of racketeering under section 895.03 . . .

STATE v. L. PURVIS A., 560 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Count I of the information alleged a RICO violation pursuant to section 895.03(3), Florida Statutes; . . . at diverse times between said dates, in said County and State, did, in violation of Florida Statute 895.03 . . .

STATE v. LUCAS,, 570 So. 2d 952 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . counts with: (1) violation of the Florida RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization) Act [§ 895.03 . . . Stat. (1985)], and (2) conspiracy to violate the Florida RICO Act [§ 895.03(4), Fla.Stat. (1985) ]. . . . II Section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1985), the RICO statute which the defendants were charged with violating . . .

WATTS, v. STATE, 558 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . In addition, the defendant was found guilty of violating section 895.03. . . . Section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1987), requires that there be a “pattern of racketeering activity.” . . .