Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 901.151 - Full Text and Legal Analysis Florida Statute 901.151 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Fla. Stat. § 901.151 (2026) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Amendments
901.151 Stop and Frisk Law.
(1) This section may be known and cited as the “Florida Stop and Frisk Law.”
(2) Whenever any law enforcement officer of this state encounters any person under circumstances which reasonably indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violation of the criminal laws of this state or the criminal ordinances of any municipality or county, the officer may temporarily detain such person for the purpose of ascertaining the identity of the person temporarily detained and the circumstances surrounding the person’s presence abroad which led the officer to believe that the person had committed, was committing, or was about to commit a criminal offense.
(3) No person shall be temporarily detained under the provisions of subsection (2) longer than is reasonably necessary to effect the purposes of that subsection. Such temporary detention shall not extend beyond the place where it was first effected or the immediate vicinity thereof.
(4) If at any time after the onset of the temporary detention authorized by subsection (2), probable cause for arrest of person shall appear, the person shall be arrested. If, after an inquiry into the circumstances which prompted the temporary detention, no probable cause for the arrest of the person shall appear, the person shall be released.
(5) Whenever any law enforcement officer authorized to detain temporarily any person under the provisions of subsection (2) has probable cause to believe that any person whom the officer has temporarily detained, or is about to detain temporarily, is armed with a dangerous weapon and therefore offers a threat to the safety of the officer or any other person, the officer may search such person so temporarily detained only to the extent necessary to disclose, and for the purpose of disclosing, the presence of such weapon. If such a search discloses such a weapon or any evidence of a criminal offense it may be seized.
(6) No evidence seized by a law enforcement officer in any search under this section shall be admissible against any person in any court of this state or political subdivision thereof unless the search which disclosed its existence was authorized by and conducted in compliance with the provisions of subsections (2)-(5).
History.ss. 1, 2, ch. 69-73; s. 1459, ch. 97-102.

Cases Citing F.S. 901.151

Copy

·Popple v. State, 626 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1993).

Cited 260 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1993 WL 406370

...Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). At this level, a police officer may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla....
0 red0 yellow381 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState of Florida v. L. C. (2024)
Cited as authorityCARTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2024)
Copy

·Johnny L. Marshall v. Sec'y, Florida Dep't of Corr., 828 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 2016).

Cited 216 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12812, 2016 WL 3742164

...Therefore, Marshall’s pro se brief and the State’s answer brief, both submitted in response to our order, are the operative briefs on appeal. . Marshall also argues that his detention and transportation to the Pizza Hut was illegal under Florida’s “Stop and Frisk Law,” Fla. Stat. § 901.151 , and that McKinley’s failure to challenge the Pizza Hut identification on this ground constituted ineffective assistance....
0 red0 yellow230 green0 procedural
Cited(citing case) (2026)
phrase: "see"
Cited(citing case) (2026)
phrase: "see"
Cited(citing case) (2026)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Webb, 398 So. 2d 820 (Fla. 1981).

Cited 188 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...story of its enactment, and the state of the law already in existence bearing on the subject." Foley v. State, 50 So.2d 179, 184 (Fla. 1951) (emphasis added). In determining legislative intent, we must give due weight and effect to the title of *825 section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977), which was placed at the beginning of the section by the legislature itself....
...The title is more than an index to what the section is about or has reference to; it is a direct statement by the legislature of its intent. Berger v. Jackson, 156 Fla. 251, 768, 23 So.2d 265 (1945). Applying these rules of statutory construction to section 901.151, Florida Stop and Frisk Law, there is no doubt that the legislature intended to adopt the federal standards for stop and frisk, and not any stricter standards. This was made abundantly clear in its title where the legislature says that section 901.151 is: AN ACT relating to "stop and frisk"; authorizing a law enforcement officer to temporarily detain and question a person under circumstances which reasonably indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to com...
...d person is armed with a dangerous weapon; provides that said person shall not be detained more than is reasonably necessary for such search unless an arrest is made; providing an effective date. Ch. 69-73, Laws of Florida. (Emphasis added.) Viewing section 901.151 in the context of its stated purpose to permit officers to temporarily detain and question persons under circumstances reasonably indicating criminal activity, past, present, or imminent, and to frisk where they have reasonable belief...
0 red0 yellow149 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityALEX GARCIA v. DANIEL JUNIOR, etc. (2021)
Cited as authorityM.G. v. State (2018)
Copy

·Hunter v. State, 660 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 1995).

Cited 134 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1995 WL 324080

...ressed. A law enforcement officer may stop a vehicle and request identification from its occupants when the officer has founded or reasonable suspicion that the occupants of the vehicle have committed, are committing, or are about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow166 green0 procedural
Copy

·State v. Stevens, 354 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Cited 99 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...e after an extensive investigation. We disagree with the court's reasoning. The right of law enforcement officers to stop and temporarily detain individuals *1247 under certain circumstances is specifically granted by the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1976)....
...The Public Defender has filed a suggestion of death of Appellee-Jackie Stevens, a/k/a Jackie Stephens. As a result the State's appeal as to this appellee has been dismissed. As to the remaining appellees, the case is Reversed and Remanded. CROSS and MOORE, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] The paragraphs of Section 901.151 most pertinent to this case are: (2) Whenever any law enforcement officer of this state encounters any person under circumstances which reasonably indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violati...
0 red0 yellow85 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Laina (2015)
Cited as authorityJoanne Baden v. State of Florida (2015)
Copy

·Bailey v. State, 319 So. 2d 22 (Fla. 1975).

Cited 86 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Defendant further cites as error the hearing of the motion to suppress during the trial, rather than before trial. The State's position is that the checking of the passengers for identification was valid under the Florida, "Stop and Frisk," law, Florida Statute 901.151; that the search and seizure of the plastic sandwich bag was legal by virtue of the, "open view doctrine;" that even if such search and seizure were to be illegal and followed therefore by an illegal arrest, the defendant gave a valid consent to the search of her cosmetic bag, thus validating the search and seizure....
...the passengers had committed, was committing, or was about to commit a violation of the criminal laws of the State, County or any municipality. Therefore, there is no validity to the State's reliance upon the, "Stop and Frisk," law, Florida Statute 901.151....
0 red0 yellow55 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityK.W. v. State (2015)
Quote AuthorityCity of Santa Fe v. Marquez (2012)
CitedShively v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Taylor v. State, 855 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2003).

Cited 66 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2003 WL 21283161

...Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). At this level, a police officer may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla....
Copy

·Perez v. State, 620 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 1993).

Cited 57 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1993 WL 219861

...Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Perez, 592 So.2d at 1099. Perez successfully moved to suppress the firearm prior to trial. The judge found that the police did not have reasonable suspicion to support an investigative stop under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987), and held that the firearm was seized as a direct result of the illegal stop....
...A temporary investigative stop, on the other hand, is permissible where police have a reasonable suspicion — i.e., a particularized and objective basis for suspecting — that the suspect has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. See generally § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow48 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
Cited as authorityState of Florida v. Reddick (2025)
CitedTHOMAS HARGROVE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2024)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Hetland, 366 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Cited 58 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...t procedures which will lighten the burden of troubling questions for both law enforcement personnel and the courts. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. SCHEB, Acting C.J., and OTT, J., concur. NOTES [1] § 901.151, Fla....
...e due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961). [4] LaFave, "Street Encounters" and the Constitution: Terry, Sibron, Peters, and Beyond, 67 Mich.L.Rev. 40 (1968). [5] Id. at 78. [6] § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1977). The statute, which has not been amended since its enactment, reads as follows: 901.151 Stop and Frisk Law....
0 red0 yellow32 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBYRON MCGRAW v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
Cited as authorityMM v. State (2012)
Copy

·Golphin v. State, 945 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 2006).

Cited 38 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2006 WL 3629581

...Second are those designated investigatory stops, at which time a police officer "may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime." Id. (citing § 901.151, Fla....
...2451, 159 L.Ed.2d 292 (2004); Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352, 103 S.Ct. 1855, 75 L.Ed.2d 903 (1983); Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). Florida has a similar statute authorizing officers to ascertain a person's identity during a lawful detention, see section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (2006), but it is not implicated in this case because there was no reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity....
0 red1 yellow77 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Caldwell v. State (2010)
phrase: "but see"
Copy

·Slydell v. State, 792 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 35 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 980801

...State, 657 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). To stop and detain a person for investigation, an officer must have a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. See Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993); § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow65 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityShaffer v. Scarborough (2025)
Cited as authorityCarty v. Broward Sheriff (2021)
Copy

·State v. Taylor, 648 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1995).

Cited 37 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1995 WL 2418

...Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and subsequent cases that certain investigative stops are permissible under the Fourth Amendment when based on an officer's reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot. This rule is codified in section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991): Whenever any law enforcement officer of this state encounters any person under circumstances which reasonably indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violation of the criminal laws of this state ......
...he may temporarily detain such person for the purpose of ascertaining the identity of the person temporarily detained and the circumstances surrounding his presence abroad which led the officer to believe that he had committed, was committing, or was about to commit a criminal offense. § 901.151(2), Fla....
...When Taylor exited his car, he staggered and exhibited slurred speech, watery, bloodshot eyes, and a strong odor of alcohol. This, combined with a high rate of speed on the highway, was more than enough to provide Quant with reasonable suspicion that a crime was being committed, i.e., DUI. The officer was entitled under section 901.151 to conduct a reasonable inquiry to confirm or deny that probable cause existed to make an arrest....
0 red0 yellow52 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCinthia Vargas v. State of Florida (2026)
Copy

·Muehleman v. State, 503 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1987).

Cited 37 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 39

...the victim's distinctive automobile. In light of Muehleman's furtive behavior and apparent attempt to flee, the officer's suspicion was eminently reasonable and he acted properly in detaining the suspect for the purpose of ascertaining his identity. § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow23 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Kolaco (2020)
CitedMuehleman v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Davis v. State (2005)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Carter v. State, 454 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Cited 41 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...e officers possessed a well-founded suspicion of criminal activity which authorized them to approach Carter's vehicle and to conduct a lawful investigatory stop and detention under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981)....
...[1] Wilson v. State, 433 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Freeman v. State, 433 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); R.B. v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. Perera, 412 So.2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition for review denied, 419 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 1982); § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
CitedMELISSA PETERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Jones (2016)
Cited as authoritySousa v. State (2016)
phrase: "cf."
Copy

·Jacobson v. State, 476 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 31 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 542

...A subsequent search of his person at the police station revealed LSD and cocaine. 337 So.2d at 1025. The district court held that the defendant's behavior before the stop did not justify a stop pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) or the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975)....
0 red0 yellow32 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAnthony Colon v. Wendell Smith (2024)
Cited as authorityAnthony Colon v. Wendell Smith (2024)
Cited as authorityLU JING v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2021)
Copy

·Hines v. State, 737 So. 2d 1182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

Cited 31 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 496156

...rabbed defendant's arm and patted down his pockets; police lacked evidence connecting defendant with drug dealing or other criminal activity). Even if we assume, without having to decide in this case, that pursuant to the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1997), Deputy Simmons had "probable cause," i.e., a reasonable belief, to believe that Hines was armed and dangerous, the deputy exceeded his constitutional authority by immediately reaching directly into Hines' pocket and removing the contraband....
...Rather, an officer need simply have a reasonable belief that the individual is armed and dangerous. State v. Webb, 398 So.2d 820, 824-25 (Fla. 1981); State v. Burns, 698 So.2d 1282, 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Daniels v. State, 543 So.2d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). [4] The Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes, is a codification of Terry....
0 red0 yellow30 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. DOUGLAS DALEY (2020)
Cited as authorityJ.H., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
Cited as authorityDixon v. State (2011)
Copy

·DG v. State, 661 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Cited 27 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 370478

...he police. The trial court found that D.G.'s protests rose to the level of a violation of section 843.02. The state does not argue that the police had a valid basis to perform an investigatory stop of D.G. or to enter his home without a warrant. See § 901.151, .19, Fla....
0 red0 yellow42 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityShaffer v. Scarborough (2025)
Cited as authorityGhandour v. CITY OF MIAMI DADE (2024)
Cited as authorityLU JING v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2021)
Copy

·State v. Simons, 549 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 30 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 116620

...A "stop," on the other hand, is permissible provided the detention is temporary and reasonable under the circumstances only when the police officer has a well-founded suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow29 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Jordan C. Beans (2017)
Cited as authorityJMC v. State (2007)
Cited as authorityJ.M.C. v. State (2007)
Copy

·State v. Pye, 551 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 30 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 128048

...Although we agree that the officers initially lacked probable cause to arrest appellee, we find that the facts and circumstances presented are sufficient to support an investigatory stop under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987)....
0 red0 yellow29 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityFuentes v. State (2009)
CitedL.J.S. v. State (2005)
phrase: "see"
CitedLJS v. State (2005)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Caldwell v. State, 41 So. 3d 188 (Fla. 2010).

Cited 26 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 425, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1115, 2010 WL 2680254

...Popple, 626 So.2d at 186. The second level is an "investigatory stop," during which an officer "may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime." Id. (citing § 901.151, Fla....
...to inform a suspect of his right to appointed counsel but then deny his request for an attorney). [11] It is established law that an officer may not conduct a frisk without reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed with a dangerous weapon. See § 901.151(5), Fla....
...icle, but neither objects nor consents to being searched. Obviously, if a citizen voluntarily accepts a ride in a police vehicle but does object to being frisked, the search would be illegal absent reasonable suspicion that the suspect is armed. See § 901.151(5), Fla....
0 red0 yellow47 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPeople v. Demolle (2026)
Quote AuthorityState of Florida v. Eddie Poke (2025)
Cited as authorityCOMMONWEALTH v. DEMOS D., a Juvenile (2025)
Copy

·Gipson v. State, 537 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 32 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 245

...the flight helped to create probable cause so that the stop was justified. The state dropped the paraphernalia charge and stipulated to the dispositive nature the trial court's order denying the motion to suppress. The "Florida Stop and Frisk Law", section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987), authorizes the temporary stop and detention of an individual based upon a police officer's founded suspicion of criminal activity for the purpose of ascertaining identity and the circumstances giving rise to the suspicion....
0 red0 yellow22 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJerry Weakley v. State of Florida (2019)
Cited as authorityFaunce v. State (2004)
Cited as authorityD.N. v. State (2002)
Copy

·Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Cited 28 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1996 WL 577399

...cer has a wellfounded suspicion that the individual detained has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. E.g., Terry, 392 U.S. at 30, 88 S.Ct. at 1884; Reynolds v. State, 592 So.2d 1082 (Fla.1992); Simons, 549 So.2d at 787; see also § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow31 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLU JING v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2021)
Cited as authorityXavier Young v. State of Florida (2019)
Copy

·Daniels v. State, 543 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

Cited 29 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 49604

...tain an individual based upon circumstances which reasonably indicate past, present or future criminal activity, for the purpose of ascertaining identity of that individual and investigating the circumstances giving rise to the officer's suspicions. Section 901.151(2), Fla....
...If an officer validly stops and detains an individual, and has probable cause to believe that the individual seized is armed with a dangerous weapon and poses a threat to the officer or any other person, the officer may search the individual to the extent necessary to disclose the weapon. Section 901.151(5)....
...In fact, the evidence established that Etheridge stopped Daniels based on a suspicion that Daniels possessed a weapon. However, the officer failed to articulate any basis for suspecting criminal activity as required in order to justify a stop and detention under section 901.151(2) and Terry v....
0 red0 yellow22 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGriffin v. State (2014)
Cited as authorityFant v. State (2011)
CitedMajors v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Coladonato v. State, 348 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 1977).

Cited 32 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...not do so arbitrarily or on a bare suspicion that the occupants are violating the law. Kersey v. State, 58 So.2d 155 (Fla. 1952); Gustafson v. State, supra; State v. Ebert, 251 So.2d 38 (Fla.App. 2nd, 1971); Wilson v. Porter, supra; see, Fla. Stat. § 901.151(2) (1975)....
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Stinson v. State (2013)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited as authorityJessup v. Miami-Dade County (2011)
Cited (see also)Harris v. State (2000)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·McMaster v. State, 780 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Cited 24 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 303222

...and limited purpose, constitutes a seizure and invokes Fourth Amendment protections. Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979); State v. Jones, 483 So.2d 433 (Fla.1986); Sapp v. State, 763 So.2d 1257 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes, provides that a police officer may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime....
0 red0 yellow32 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)CARTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2024)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityState v. Jordan C. Beans (2017)
Copy

·Patrick v. State, 104 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. 2012).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2546, 2012 WL 6049585

...Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). At this level, a police officer may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla....
Copy

·Steele v. State, 561 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Cited 23 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 57808

...ty jail, with credit for time served. The first issue is directed to the denial of appellant's motion to suppress evidence. Both parties recite the appropriate guidelines and authority for determining the propriety of a "stop and frisk," pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes, termed a codification of Terry v....
0 red0 yellow25 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPrescott v. State (2009)
Cited as authorityRegalado v. State (2009)
Cited as authorityThomas v. State (2006)
Copy

·Walker v. State, 514 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

Cited 28 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2546

...Walker pled nolo contendere to possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia, reserving his right to appeal the court's order. We find the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress because the initial stop and the subsequent search violated the Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1985)....
...Walker argues that the pipe, cocaine and statement made immediately after his arrest should have been suppressed. We agree. While a law enforcement officer may temporarily detain a person for investigation under circumstances reasonably indicating that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime, § 901.151, Fla....
...igatory pat-down. Where an officer has probable cause to believe that someone properly detained is armed with a dangerous weapon and presents a threat to his safety, the statute allows a search only to the extent necessary to disclose such a weapon. § 901.151(5), Fla....
...G.J.P., 469 So.2d 826. Moreover, even had there been proper grounds to detain Walker and search him for weapons, the officer knew before seizing the pipe that it was not a weapon. He thus exceeded the permissible scope of such a search as outlined in section 901.151....
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityConyers v. State (2015)
CitedML v. State (2010)
phrase: "see"
CitedM.L. v. State (2010)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State, Dept. of Hwy. Saf. v. Deshong, 603 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Cited 22 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 193001

...REASONABLE SUSPICION TO JUSTIFY A SAFETY-RELATED TRAFFIC STOP In order to effect a valid stop for DUI, the officer need only have a "founded suspicion" of criminal activity. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Piediscalzo v. State, 549 So.2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow26 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityKelly v. Bartow Police Department (2024)
Copy

·GJP v. State, 469 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Cited 28 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1075

...est should have been suppressed. We agree. A law enforcement officer may temporarily detain a person for purposes of investigation under circumstances reasonably indicating that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Cruse (2013)
Cited as authorityParsons v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityElliott v. State (1992)
Copy

·State v. Russell, 659 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1995 WL 497109

...y stop. An investigatory stop is authorized when a law enforcement officer "encounters any person under circumstances which reasonably indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violation of the criminal laws[.]" § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow27 green0 procedural
CitedDarnell v. State (2016)
phrase: "see"
CitedDarnell v. State (2016)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authority(citing case) (2015)
Copy

·Mullins v. State, 366 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 1978).

Cited 26 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida

...Porter, 361 F.2d 412 (9th Cir.1966), it is equally well recognized that he may not do so arbitrarily or on a bare suspicion that the occupants are violating the law. Kersey v. State, 58 So.2d 155 (Fla. 1952); Gustafson v. State, supra; State v. Ebert, 251 So.2d 38 (Fla.App. 2nd 1971); Wilson v. Porter, supra; see, Fla. Stat. § 901.151(2) (1975)....
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
CitedStinson v. State (2013)
phrase: "accord"
Cited as authorityJessup v. Miami-Dade County (2011)
CitedState v. T.P. (2003)
phrase: "accord"
Copy

·Bentley v. State, 411 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 23 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...After the officer noticed a distinctively shaped bulge in appellant's pocket, which appeared to the officer to be a weapon, the officer was warranted in conducting a limited pat down search that revealed a concealed firearm. Therefore, the trial court properly denied the motion to suppress. See § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow18 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Rife (2001)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityMatthews v. State (1999)
CitedDozier v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Kearse v. State, 384 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Cited 25 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...State, 348 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Although our decision upon the stop is dispositive, we consider it appropriate to discuss the fact that appellant was ordered to turn around and put his hands on the store wall, preparatory to a pat-down search for weapons. Section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1977), permits a limited search only when a law enforcement officer "has probable cause to believe that any person whom he has temporarily detained, or is about to detain temporarily, is armed with a dangerous we...
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2013)
Cited as authorityStinson v. State (2013)
Cited (see also)Alexander v. State (1997)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Wilson v. State, 734 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Cited 19 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 270419

...State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978)). *1110 To justify a temporary detention of an individual, a law enforcement officer must have a founded suspicion of criminal activity. Moore v. State, 584 So.2d 1122, 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow22 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPresley v. State (2016)
Cited (see also)Edwin Aguiar v. State (2016)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityForman v. State (2013)
Copy

·State v. Baez, 894 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 2004).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2004 WL 2534352

...Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). At this level, a police officer may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow30 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState of Florida v. Powell (2025)
Copy

·Lewis v. State, 337 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 30 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...His motion to suppress was denied and he was convicted following a jury trial. In order to stop an automobile and to request identification from its occupants, it is not necessary for the police to have probable cause. Rather, the police are governed in this respect by Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975) (the "Stop and Frisk Law") and Terry v....
...s further investigation. [1] State v. Othen, 300 So.2d 732 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). We hold that the circumstances here were insufficient to reasonably indicate that the occupants of the car had committed, were committing, or were about to commit a crime. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975)....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedRoss v. State (1982)
phrase: "see"
CitedSanders v. State (1980)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityMock v. State (1980)
Copy

·Parsons v. State, 825 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 851744

...Parsons was not free to leave and the officer's encounter became an investigatory stop. To justify an investigatory stop, a police officer must have a well-founded suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow24 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Moore v. State (2016)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityA.P. v. State (2016)
Cited as authorityDermio v. State (2013)
Copy

·State v. Hoover, 520 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

Cited 20 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 15446

...Kibbee, 513 So.2d 256 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Bartlett v. State, 508 So.2d 567 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); State v. Beja, 451 So.2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Kearse v. State, 384 So.2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); State v. Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHernandez v. State (1999)
CitedWaddell v. State (1995)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Troutman (1992)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Peabody v. State, 556 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 12752

...arrest. We agree with the appellant. Before a law enforcement officer may temporarily detain a person for purposes of investigation, circumstances must reasonably indicate that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Walker (2008)
phrase: "see"
CitedK.G.M. v. State (2002)
phrase: "see"
CitedKGM v. State (2002)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Anderson, 591 So. 2d 611 (Fla. 1992).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 1992 WL 158

...ld have been suppressed. We address first the legality of Anderson's detention. Police officers may temporarily detain a person upon circumstances which reasonably indicate that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow18 green0 procedural
CitedTTN v. State (2010)
phrase: "see"
CitedT.T.N. v. State (2010)
phrase: "see"
CitedBravo v. State (2007)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Dees v. State, 564 So. 2d 1166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1834

...t the case at bar involves an illegal stop rather than a lawful encounter. I. Under Florida law, police officers must have a founded suspicion to justify detaining a person suspected of having committed, committing, or being about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow21 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Champers (2013)
CitedJune v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authoritySmith v. State (2012)
Copy

·Grant v. State, 718 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1998 WL 518502

...the very general description of the car and the early morning hour together yield only a mere suspicion. The requirement that a founded reasonable suspicion must pertain to anticipated or suspected criminal activity cannot be met under these facts. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow21 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityRegalado v. State (2009)
Cited as authorityParker v. State (2008)
Copy

·State v. Dilyerd, 467 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 1985).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 192

...On appeal the district court reversed the denial of the motion to suppress on the ground that the search violated the provisions of the fourth amendment, United States Constitution and article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution. In doing so, the district court concluded that the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981), was not applicable to cars, only persons, and was certainly not applicable here because there was no probable cause to believe that either occupant had a weapon, and that "[f]urtive stuffing of unknown objects under the seat of a car may make one, curious or even suspicious ......
0 red0 yellow14 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Toussaint (2015)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Sumner (2008)
Copy

·State v. Burns, 661 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Cited 17 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1942

...REVERSED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED. COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] The Florida Supreme Court recently addressed the propriety of roadside tests under a similar factual scenario in State v. Taylor, 648 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1995) and held: "The officer was entitled under section 901.151 to conduct a reasonable inquiry to confirm or deny that probable cause existed to make an arrest....
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr. (2016)
Cited as authorityState of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr. (2016)
Copy

·Belsky v. State, 831 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31757481

...ther appellant was lawfully detained at the time. To detain a person for investigation, an officer must have a reasonable suspicion, based on objective, articulable facts, that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime." § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow22 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. J.T. (2014)
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2013)
Cited as authorityMenne v. State (2012)
Copy

·Thomas v. State, 250 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).

Cited 18 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

...in evidence over appellant's objection on the ground it had been obtained by an illegal search and seizure. The trial court based its denial of appellant's motion to suppress the pistol squarely on the recently enacted "Florida Stop and Frisk Law", Section 901.151, Florida Statutes, F.S.A....
...The officer having next arrived asked appellant what he had in his pocket and then, without awaiting an answer, felt the outside of the pocket and, noting the sharpness of the object, put his hand in the pocket and found the pistol. Though recognizing the provisions of Section 901.151, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., appellant contends that what the officer observed was insufficient to give him probable cause to believe that the appellant was armed with a dangerous weapon. This contention was correctly rejected by the trial court. The court below properly held that the officer making the "frisk" acted within the scope of the authority of Section 901.151 as a reasonably trained law enforcement officer would act under the same circumstances in the same area; and, therefore, he did have probable cause to believe that the subject might be armed with a dangerous weapon, thereby threatening the safety of the officer and other persons....
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJ.M.C. v. State (2007)
Cited as authorityJMC v. State (2007)
Cited as authoritySaturnino-Boudet v. State (1996)
Copy

·Wigfall v. State, 323 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Cited 21 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...nt brings this appeal. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the initial encounter, between the arresting officer and himself, which led to his arrest and search violated the requirements of § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWillingham v. City of Orlando (2006)
Cited as authorityState v. Walkin (2001)
CitedOliva v. State (1989)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Taylor v. State, 640 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 201553

...An officer may detain a citizen temporarily if the officer reasonably suspects that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit, a crime. Mere suspicion is not enough to support a detention; rather, the officer must be able to articulate a well-founded suspicion of criminal activity. § 901.151, Fla....
Copy

·Hernandez v. State, 784 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 1062502

...The trial court heard evidence on the defendant's motion to suppress, and denied the motion. The court concluded that under the totality of the circumstances, the police officer had a founded suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, and that an investigatory stop was justified. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1997). We entirely agree. The question is whether the police officer had a reasonable suspicion a crime had been, was being, or was about to be, committed. See § 901.151(2), Fla....
...the scene were sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that Hernandez had committed, was committing, or was about to commit a violation of the criminal laws of this state or the criminal ordinances of any municipality or county pursuant to section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1997)....
...Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 502, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40, 62, 88 S.Ct. 1889, 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968); Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993); § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow21 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityS. M. v. State of Florida (2025)
Cited (see also)T.I.J., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida (2024)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Dewberry v. State, 905 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 1488577

...Dewberry reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress, and the State agreed the issue was dispositive. The issue that we are called upon to resolve is whether the officer who conducted the pat-down search of Dewberry had probable cause to search Dewberry based on section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (2003)....
...The Florida Stop and Frisk Law allows an officer, who has validly stopped an individual, to search the individual only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the individual is armed with a dangerous weapon and poses a threat to the officer or any other person. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2003). The meaning of "probable cause" in this statute is not the same as the stricter "probable cause" standard to justify a search warrant or an arrest. See State v. Burns, 698 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). As used in section 901.151(5), "probable cause" means reasonable belief or suspicion. State v. Webb, 398 So.2d 820 (Fla.1981) (stating that the probable cause standard adopted in section 901.151(5) means reasonable suspicion); Sutton v....
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySiavash Zargari v. USA (2016)
Cited as authorityK.S. v. State (2012)
Copy

·Johnson v. State, 537 So. 2d 117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1988 WL 138490

...Moreover, the bags had not been observed on the ground when the officers first approached the car. The initial stop was correctly validated as a legitimate traffic stop. In addition, we have no difficulty sustaining the stop of the vehicle pursuant to the Stop and Frisk Law, Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1987), which permits a law enforcement officer to stop and temporarily detain a person when circumstances indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violation of the criminal laws of the state....
...r. A lawful stop does not of its own force, however, validate a frisk. The routine stopping of a vehicle for a traffic citation does not give rise to any reason or authorization for a search. State v. Gustafson, 258 So.2d 1, 3 (Fla. 1972). Moreover, Section 901.151(5) permits a law enforcement officer to conduct a search of the person whom he has temporarily detained only to the extent necessary to disclose the presence of a weapon when the officer has probable cause to believe the person is armed and dangerous....
...safety. In fact, Watzlawick testified that he patted appellant down to see if he was dangerous. See Chauncey v. State, 382 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (seizure of cocaine resulting from pat-down search of passenger in automobile was illegal under section 901.151 because officer had no reason to believe the passenger was armed when he stopped the car for a tail-light violation, after having observed the car passing him with its dome light on and the three occupants huddled together as if *120 searching for something); Kearse v....
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBrown v. State (2001)
Cited as authorityA.J.M. v. State (1999)
Copy

·Ketan Kumar v. Nirav C. Patel, 227 So. 3d 557 (Fla. 2017).

Cited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 2017 WL 4296212

...to arresting an individual suspected of killing or causing bodily harm to another (or attempting to do so). The law is clear that we expect officers to temporarily detain a person encountered under circumstances creating a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow17 green0 procedural
CitedState of Florida v. Johnny Wesley (2026)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityStorey Mountain v. Carlos C. Del Amo (2025)
CitedJennifer Thompson v. John Vilches (2025)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Huffman v. State, 937 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2432809

...See Hines, 737 So.2d at 1184. A stop and/or brief detention of a person for investigatory purposes is permissible if an officer has a well-founded suspicion (supported by articulable facts) of criminal activity, even if the officer lacks probable cause. See § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow17 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. EMMET ZACHERY (2018)
Cited as authorityDarius L. Grayson v. State (2017)
Copy

·State v. Paul, 638 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1994 WL 169964

...The initial stop of Paul's vehicle was based upon a founded suspicion that a crime may have been committed or about to be committed. It was an investigatory stop permissible under federal and state law. See Terry v. State of Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityJORGE AGUILAR v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
Cited as authorityZ. E. v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
Cited as authorityCassidy v. State (2009)
Copy

·Lachs v. State, 366 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

...When she opened her pocketbook to provide same, the officer then made a plain view seizure of a supposed "nickel bag" which he preliminarily determined to be marijuana after inspecting its contents. He thereupon placed the appellant under arrest. We have repeatedly written on Florida's "stop and frisk" law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977) and would normally see no reason for yet another opinion....
0 red1 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"State v. Chapel (1987)
phrase: "but cf."
Cited as authorityL.O. v. State (2010)
phrase: "cf."
Cited as authorityLO v. State (2010)
phrase: "cf."
Copy

·Blake v. State, 939 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed. 2d 889 (1968). At this level, a police officer may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Marciano (2025)
CitedSTATE OF FLORIDA v. SEBASTION TIGNER (2019)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityJames M. Bryant v. State of Florida (2019)
Copy

·Jordan v. State, 544 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 61106

...detain him. We agree and reverse his conviction for possession of cocaine. A law enforcement officer may temporarily detain a person if the officer has a founded suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Thomasset v. State (2000)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedCrew v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
CitedCole v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Sumlin v. State, 433 So. 2d 1303 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...The court placed him on probation for three years, and this appeal ensued. In order to stop an automobile and to request identification from its occupants, it is not necessary for the police to have probable cause. Rather, the police are governed in this respect by section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981), and Terry v....
...r investigation. The circumstances must reasonably indicate that the occupants of the vehicle have committed, are committing, or are about to commit a crime. Lewis v. State, 337 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 345 So.2d 427 (Fla. 1977); § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Quote AuthoritySousa v. State (2016)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityJonavon D. Gaines v. State (2015)
Cited as authorityRodriguez v. State (2007)
Copy

·Winters v. State, 578 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1991 WL 24849

...We add that the seizure of the cocaine cannot be justified as a search incident to arrest, because the detention was not supported by facts sufficient to establish probable cause for an arrest. Reversed and remanded. SCHEB, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur. NOTES [1] § 893.13(1)(f), Fla. Stat. (1987). [2] § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)L.C. v. State (2009)
phrase: "compare"
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2009)
Cited as authorityDBA v. State (2007)
Copy

·Johnson v. State, 785 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 543215

...1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Popple, 626 So.2d at 186. At this level, a police officer may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. Sec. 901.151 Fla....
...Popple, 626 So.2d at 186 (citation omitted). [2] It is clear that a pat down is authorized when an officer has made an investigatory stop and the officer has probable cause to believe that the person stopped is armed with a dangerous weapon. See Terry, 392 U.S. at 30-31, 88 S.Ct. 1868; § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2000). Both Terry and section 901.151(5) authorize a pat down during such a temporary detention....
...dangerous, without any indication at the inception of the encounter that the citizen "has committed, [was] committing, or [was] about to commit a violation of the criminal laws of this state or the criminal ordinances of any municipality or county." § 901.151(2), Fla....
...The unspoken assumption in Brown is that the defendant was carrying a concealed weapon without a license, a criminal violation under section 790.01, Florida Statutes (2000). A reasonable belief that a person is committing such a weapons violation authorizes a temporary detention under the stop and frisk law. See § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow22 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Maxwell (2018)
Cited as authorityJune v. State (2012)
Cited as authoritySantiago v. State (2012)
Copy

·State v. Chapman, 376 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal

...lusions. Brenner v. State, 337 So.2d 1007 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). While we agree with the trial court's finding of no probable cause, we do not agree with the contentions of the State that the concepts of founded suspicion and the stop and frisk statute, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977), apply to a municipal officer outside his jurisdiction and not in "hot pursuit"....
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityDUMILE CAROLINA WAGNER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2023)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedState v. Allen (2001)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Furr (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Ruddack v. State, 537 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 1989 WL 6238

...h crime area, to serve as a factual basis to detain the defendant or search for a weapon. Nor were there any exigent or unusual circumstances which would justify the officer's actions. The detention and search did not rise to the level authorized by section 901.151, Florida Statutes, or Terry v....
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
CitedWilliams v. State (2004)
phrase: "see"
CitedLD v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
CitedL.D. v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Johnson v. State, 610 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 14 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 362197

...ockets and to turn around was a directive that Appellant was not free to disregard. See Dees v. State, 564 So.2d 1166, 1168 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). To justify such a seizure, a law enforcement officer must have a founded suspicion of criminal activity. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989); Terry....
...3d DCA 1984) (rapid succession of transactions involving exchange of cash and unseen item in plastic bag). The initial stop cannot be justified by Officer Bates' observation, after the illegal detention, of a bulge in the rear pants pocket. Daniels. Section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that if the officer has probable cause to believe the detainee is armed with a dangerous weapon, a search can be conducted to the extent necessary to disclose the presence of the weapon....
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityJune v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
CitedR.J.C. v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Johnson v. State (2001)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Dunn v. State, 382 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...weapon. He removed the object, and, his suspicions being confirmed, placed appellant under arrest. We reject appellant's first argument that the officers had no right to search him for any purpose. There was ample basis under the stop and frisk law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979), for the officers to conduct a limited search to determine whether appellant was carrying a weapon....
...apons when there was no probable cause for arrest. In quashing the search in Meeks, we said: *729 Our reading of the Terry decision and cases from other jurisdictions which have interpreted Terry leads us to believe that the language we have quoted [Section 901.151(5)] means that an officer in a stop and frisk situation may not extend his search beyond a pat down of a suspect's outer clothing unless that pat down or other circumstances leads the officer to conclude that the suspect has a weapon on his person....
...encounters contraband during a legal stop and frisk he should be able to seize it and make an arrest on the premise that he has become aware that the suspect is committing the crime of possession of contraband in his presence. Moreover, we note that Section 901.151(5), which outlines the circumstances under which an officer may make a search for weapons, concludes with the statement that if "such a search discloses such a weapon or any evidence of a criminal offense it may be seized." (Emphasis...
...ficers to search for contraband with less than probable cause on the ostensible premise of looking for weapons. Be that as it may, we have decided to adhere to our decision in Meeks. *730 This leaves us to consider the effect of the last sentence of Section 901.151(5)....
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEB v. State (2004)
Cited as authorityE.B. v. State (2004)
Cited as authorityCole v. State (1999)
Copy

·State v. Gandy, 766 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1369882

...State, 524 So.2d 988 (Fla.1988). The question before us is whether, at the time the officers asked Gandy and his passenger to exit their vehicle, the officers had a well founded reasonable suspicion that Gandy committed, was committing, or was about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityKendrick Herring v. State of Florida (2015)
Copy

·Jones v. State, 570 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 1990 WL 183822

...opping appellant. The law states that a police officer may temporarily detain a person for the purpose of ascertaining his or her identity if the officer believes that the person has committed, is committing or is about to commit a criminal offense. § 901.151(2), Fla....
...e circumstances of this case was justified. It is well established that an officer may only frisk or pat down an individual incident to an investigatory stop when he has probable cause to believe that the individual is armed with a dangerous weapon. § 901.151(5), Fla....
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. A.R.R. (2013)
CitedWhitaker v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Quote AuthorityL.F. v. State (2002)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Jones, 417 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Cited 13 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

...1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), and both the Florida and federal provisions have been construed as providing identical protection. State v. Hetland, 366 So.2d 831 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979), affirmed, 387 So.2d 963 (Fla. 1980) (adopting opinion of the district court of appeal). Additionally, Florida's stop and frisk statute, § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979), has been interpreted as imposing these same constitutional standards. State v. Hetland . Section 901.151 provides, in part: Whenever any law enforcement officer of this state encounters any person under circumstances which reasonably indicate that such person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violation of the criminal...
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Laina (2015)
Cited as authorityState v. Outler (2009)
Cited as authorityState v. Burgos (2008)
Copy

·Richardson v. State, 599 So. 2d 703 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 98715

...e denial of his motion. Adjudication of guilt was withheld and he was placed on probation for one year. The issue presented is whether a temporary stop for a civil traffic violation will, under the circumstances at bar, justify a weapons frisk under Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989)....
0 red0 yellow19 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySantiago v. State (2012)
CitedState v. Herron (2011)
phrase: "see"
CitedL.C. v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Smith v. State, 592 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Cited 12 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1992 WL 9703

...1st DCA 1990). In order to justify a temporary detention of a person, there must be a founded suspicion in the mind of the officer that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. Wilson v. State, 433 So.2d 1301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); § 901.151, Fla....
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityTillman v. State (2006)
phrase: "cf."
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2000)
Cited (see also)Johnson v. State (1997)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Smith v. State, 735 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 1999 WL 391303

...Smith, perspiring and nervous, watched as the driver was arrested does not give rise to a reasonable suspicion that he carried a weapon. The patdown of Mr. Smith violates the principles enunciated in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1997)....
0 red0 yellow14 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEJ v. State (2010)
Cited as authorityE.J. v. State (2010)
Copy

·Brye v. State, 927 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 995843

...Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). At this level, a police officer may reasonably detain a citizen temporarily if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla....
...mitted, was committing, or was about to commit a crime. Because the deputy continued to retain Appellant's I.D. card after the warrant check came back clean, and then asked for permission to conduct a personal search, the detention was unlawful. See § 901.151(2), Fla....
0 red0 yellow17 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Lane v. State (2014)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityMartin v. State (2014)
CitedPartlow v. State (2013)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Burgess v. State, 313 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

Cited 15 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...uests for identification. Nevertheless, the court's function is to determine whether there was a lawful basis for appellant's arrest. While it is permissible for a police officer to detain an individual under Florida's Stop and Frisk Law, Fla. Stat. § 901.151, we are unaware of any requirement of law for an individual citizen to disclose his identity under the factual situation sub judice....
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedI.K. v. State (2018)
phrase: "see"
CitedI. K. v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityRisbridger v. Connelly (2000)
Copy

·Ray v. State, 849 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21749539

...Following a stop, "police officers are authorized to execute a pat-down for weapons only where they have a reasonable suspicion to believe that a suspect is armed with a dangerous weapon." Campuzano v. State, 771 So.2d 1238, 1243 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also § 901.151(5), Fla....
0 red0 yellow16 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. DOUGLAS DALEY (2020)
Cited as authorityGriffin v. State (2014)
Copy

·Vollmer v. State, 337 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

Cited 16 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal

...Without more, the fact that appellant was walking along a main public thoroughfare at 3:00 A.M. and turned to look at a police car is an insufficient basis to justify a stop under Terry v. Ohio, 1968, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, or Florida's Stop and Frisk Law, Fla. Stat. § 901.151....
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Sanchez v. State (2016)
phrase: "compare"
CitedSlydell v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
CitedWard v. State (1984)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Gonzalez, 682 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 625591

S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)); see also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1993). The Supreme Court has said:
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityRivera v. State of Florida (2024)
Cited as authorityChristian Cruz v. State of Florida (2021)
Copy

·Ippolito v. State, 789 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 11 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 686507

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2000); see also Terry v. Ohio
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Santiago v. State (2014)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2013)
Cited as authorityMenne v. State (2012)
Copy

·AER v. State, 464 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 212

complaint, they were authorized, pursuant to section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1983),[1] to pursue the
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityANTHONY v. NIEVES v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
CitedJONATHAN OSORIO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityP.B.P. v. State (2007)
Copy

·Brooks v. State, 745 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 1112291

activity before detaining the citizen). And see § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1997) (Florida's Stop and Frisk Law)
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
CitedG.M. v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
CitedGM v. State (2008)
phrase: "see"
CitedG.M. v. State (2008)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·McNeil v. State, 656 So. 2d 1320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 WL 316335

88 S.Ct. 1868, 1884, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1993). McNeil was a passenger
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CitedWhitfield v. State (2010)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Tanner (2005)
phrase: "see"
CitedMaxwell v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Campuzano v. State, 771 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1671863

suspect is armed with a dangerous weapon. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1999); State v. Webb, 398 So.2d
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
CitedG.M., a Child v. State of Florida (2015)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authoritySantiago v. State (2012)
Cited as authorityT.M. v. State (2010)
Copy

·State v. Wise, 603 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 174154

issued. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.124. Pursuant to section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1991), an officer may
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityL.O. v. State (2010)
Cited as authorityLO v. State (2010)
Cited as authorityRegalado v. State (2009)
Copy

·Hill v. State, 561 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 66190

person detained is armed with a dangerous weapon. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1985). In this case, the police officer
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGolphin v. State (2006)
CitedBatson v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Quote AuthorityIppolito v. State (2001)
Copy

·McLane v. Rose, 537 So. 2d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 194

criminal ordinances of any municipality or county. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1987). See also, Terry v. Ohio, 392
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGolphin v. State (2006)
Cited (see also)In Re Forfeiture of 1999 Dodge Intrepid (2006)
phrase: "see also"
Cited (see also)Walker v. Judd (2006)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Lower v. State, 348 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Cited 16 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

337 So.2d 1031, 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975). See also Terry v
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedBrown v. State (1994)
phrase: "accord"
Cited as authorityMcCloud v. State (1986)
Cited (see also)Kearse v. State (1980)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·John v. State, 363 So. 2d 862 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 18 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

stopping and detaining appellant pursuant to Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975). The sole basis for
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Gifford (1990)
Cited as authorityIn Interest of Gar (1980)
Copy

·Doctor v. State, 573 So. 2d 157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 2734

Graham, 495 So.2d at 854. The last sentence of section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1987), reads: If [a stop
0 red2 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"T.P. v. State (1991)
phrase: "but see"
Cited "but see"TP v. State (1991)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityF.J.R. v. State (2006)
Copy

·Rodriguez v. State, 29 So. 3d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11580, 2009 WL 2514168

authority to conduct a Terry stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (2006), to investigate the
0 red0 yellow14 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIn Re: Eric Watkins (2024)
Quote AuthorityLU JING v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2021)
CitedEric Watkins v. Brian Miller (2019)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Lundy, 334 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

however "lawfully detained" under Fla. Stat. § 901.151 (1975), which allows law enforcement officers
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CitedP.L.R. v. State (1984)
phrase: "see"
CitedPLR v. State (1984)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Nicholo v. State (1980)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Mosier, 392 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). [3] See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979). [4] We pause long enough
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBrown v. State (1991)
CitedState v. Rodriguez (1989)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Gray (1988)
phrase: "cf."
Copy

·State v. Burns, 698 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 464376

search. We agree. Florida's Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1995), provides in pertinent
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Gefroh (2011)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited (see also)Brigham Oil v. Lario Oil (2011)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited as authorityLeach v. State (2007)
Copy

·Lang v. State, 671 So. 2d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 168917

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See also § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1993) (the Stop and Frisk Law). At
0 red0 yellow18 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityJune v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
Quote AuthorityR.J.C. v. State (2012)
Cited (see also)R.J.Y. v. State (2006)
phrase: "compare"
Copy

·Edwards v. State, 532 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 112288

suspects under the stop and frisk statute, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1985). The appellate court
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHatcher v. State (2009)
Cited as authorityTarver v. State (2007)
Cited as authorityGreen v. State (2002)
Copy

·LDP v. State, 551 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 135517

stop and detain an individual pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes, only where he has a founded
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLester v. State (2000)
Cited as authorityHernandez v. State (1999)
Cited (see also)Stalling v. State (1996)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Thomas v. State, 644 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 600792

founded suspicion to conduct a stop under section 901.151 and ask the defendant to put his hands on the
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
CitedGriffin v. State (2014)
phrase: "see"
Quote AuthorityHilton v. State (2005)
Cited as authorityHicks v. State (2003)
Copy

·Faunce v. State, 884 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2270813

Popple v. State 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993); § 901.151(2) Fla. Stat. (2003). A hunch or a mere suspicion
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEric D. Wilson v. State of Indiana (2026)
Cited as authorityFlynn v. Hon starr/state (2019)
Cited as authorityJerry Weakley v. State of Florida (2019)
Copy

·Jordan v. State, 664 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 WL 642272

which is limited in scope to search for weapons); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1993). While conducting the search
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
CitedT.T., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityGriffin v. State (2014)
Quote AuthorityEB v. State (2004)
Copy

·State v. Baldwin, 686 So. 2d 682 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 728697

State, 537 So.2d 1080, 1081 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); § 901.151, Fla. Stat.; Terry. Because the trial court must
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityR.J.C. v. State (2012)
Copy

·State v. Arnold, 475 So. 2d 301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2191

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1983); see, e.g., Brown v. Texas
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Cherfils v. State of Florida (2025)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedRouse v. State (1994)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)State v. Barnett (1991)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Patmore v. State, 383 So. 2d 309 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

stop appellant for questioning pursuant to Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979), and the rationale
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBenny Saintil v. State of Florida (2025)
Cited (see also)McClamma v. State (2014)
phrase: "see also"
Cited (see also)State v. Williams (2000)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Davis, 543 So. 2d 375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 49921

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1987). While the disparity in names
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
CitedA.L. v. State (2014)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Reyes (2009)
CitedChapman v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·McCarter v. State, 463 So. 2d 546 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 397

ascertain identification and circumstances under section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes, does not authorize an
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. James E. Cartner (2014)
Cited as authorityDelhall v. State (2012)
Copy

·Bryant v. State, 577 So. 2d 1372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 46821

if one occurred,[1] was not unlawful. Under section 901.151, an officer must have an articulable suspicion
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2005)
Cited as authorityGraham v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityWilson v. State (1999)
Copy

·Frias v. Demings, 823 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (M.D. Fla. 2011).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119126, 2011 WL 4903086

basis of this legal duty was § 901.151 of the Florida Statutes. Id. § 901.151 is Florida’s “Stop and Frisk”
0 red0 yellow15 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
Cited as authorityKing v. Lee County (2025)
Quote AuthorityD.B. v. The Wendy's Company (2024)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Baggett v. State, 531 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 100555

and permissible under the "stop and frisk" law, § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1987). To justify such a stop and
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySennett v. United States (2011)
CitedNapoleon v. State (2008)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Brandin v. State (1996)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Meeks v. State, 356 So. 2d 45 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 16 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

reason for finding the seizure to be improper. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975) is based on the holding
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityT.T., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
Cited as authorityG.M., a Child v. State of Florida (2015)
Copy

·Sutton v. State, 698 So. 2d 1321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 563422

violation of the criminal laws of this state." § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). However, a valid stop does
0 red0 yellow14 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityK.S. v. State (2012)
Cited as authorityKS v. State (2012)
Cited as authorityDLJ v. State (2006)
Copy

·State v. Kibbee, 513 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2360

evidence. The Florida Stop and Frisk Law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1985), provides in part:
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLJS v. State (2005)
Cited as authorityL.J.S. v. State (2005)
Cited as authorityRinehart v. State (2000)
Copy

·Rouse v. State, 643 So. 2d 696 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 561861

justified under Florida's Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991). Shaw v. State, 611
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMajors v. State (2011)
Cited as authorityState v. Livingston (2006)
Cited as authorityState v. O'Neill (2003)
phrase: "cf."
Copy

·State v. Lennon, 963 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1931364

codified in Florida's Stop and Frisk Law. Section 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2006), provides, in relevant
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityChristian Cruz v. State of Florida (2021)
Quote AuthorityMaxwell v. State (2015)
Copy

·Howard v. State, 645 So. 2d 156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 655158

the officer must release that defendant. See § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1993). Any further detention of that
0 red1 yellow11 green0 procedural
LimitedJordan v. State (1995)
phrase: "see"
CitedCrawford v. State (2007)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityEB v. State (2004)
Copy

·Freeman v. State, 433 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

committing, or is about to commit a crime. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981); Kearse v. State,
0 red1 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Tamer v. State (1985)
phrase: "but see"
Cited (see also)State v. Arnold (1985)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited (see also)State v. Williams (1985)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Beja, 451 So. 2d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1983). In Stevens, this court
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Hernandez (1998)
CitedSilverman v. State (1992)
phrase: "see"
CitedCastillo v. State (1988)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Bastien v. State, 522 So. 2d 550 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 26124

permissible under the "stop and frisk" law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes. To justify such a stop and
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Mack v. State (1990)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedCastillo v. State (1988)
phrase: "see"
CitedRobinson v. State (1988)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Codie v. State, 406 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

appeal ensued. Our "stop and frisk" law, Florida Statute 901.151(2) (1979), provides: Whenever any law enforcement
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CitedRosenquist v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Willis v. State (1991)
phrase: "see also"
CitedMcLane v. Rose (1989)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Hartzog, 575 So. 2d 1328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 27161

degree to a felony of the third degree. [2] § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1983).
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Quote AuthoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. JAMAAL PICKERSGILL (2019)
phrase: "see also"
Cited (see also)Burney v. State (2012)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedSINQUEFIELD v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Freeman v. State, 559 So. 2d 295 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 35923

evidentiary support for that finding in this record. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989), provides that a law
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGriffin v. State (2014)
CitedSmith v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
CitedChambers v. State (1997)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·JCW v. State, 545 So. 2d 306 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 36160

albeit a temporary one — of a person. See section 901.151, Florida Statutes; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S.
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGolphin v. State (2006)
Cited as authorityDN v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityD.N. v. State (2002)
Copy

·State v. Wimbush, 668 So. 2d 280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 65791

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1993); Brown v. State, 636 So.2d
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Goodwin (2010)
CitedBlake v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
CitedBlake v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Clark, 721 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 WL 842795

Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244, 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1997); see also Hunter v. State, 660
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityBenoit v. City of Lake City (2018)
phrase: "see also"
CitedD.S. v. State (2013)
phrase: "see"
CitedPickett v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Harris v. State, 352 So. 2d 1269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

temporary detention of appellant allowed by Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975), the officer's actions
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Miyasato (2001)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Larcomb (1991)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityHansen v. State (1980)
Copy

·Cummo v. State, 581 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 110466

1032, 103 S.Ct. 3469, 77 L.Ed.2d 1201 (1983); § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat.; and Thomas v. State. See also
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Witherspoon (2006)
Cited as authorityConey v. State (2002)
Cited (see also)McNeil v. State (1999)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Perera, 412 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), or section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979). Even a person temporarily
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Flores (2006)
Cited as authorityState v. Hendrex (2003)
CitedState v. Lewis (1988)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Johnson v. State, 547 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 87560

permissible under Florida's "Stop and Frisk Law." See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1987); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityFaunce v. State (2004)
Cited as authorityHernandez v. State (1999)
Cited as authorityJohnson v. State (1992)
Copy

·Tennyson v. State, 469 So. 2d 133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 931

Deputy Moch searched appellant's vehicle. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1981), Florida's Stop
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedDeLeon v. State (1997)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityThames v. State (1992)
Cited as authorityVelez v. State (1989)
Copy

·Parker v. State, 363 So. 2d 383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

The Terry standards have been codified in Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977), which provides in
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Sanchez v. State (2016)
phrase: "compare"
Cited as authorityRobison v. State (2011)
Cited as authorityMcChesney v. State (1999)
Copy

·Moore v. State, 584 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 164402

motion to suppress. We agree and reverse. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1987), Florida's Stop
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CitedBrown v. State (2010)
phrase: "see"
Quote AuthorityPhillips v. State (2001)
Cited (see also)G.A.M. v. State (2001)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·State v. Marshall, 695 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 460696

than an ordinary investigatory stop under section 901.151, Florida Statutes. Since Miranda warnings are
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBenavides v. Tesla, Inc (2025)
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. DANIEL BLOCKER (2023)
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. RUBEN ALLEN JONES (2019)
Copy

·Piediscalzo v. State, 549 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 112136

DCA 1988). The Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1987), permits a law
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Reyes (2009)
Cited (see also)Brandin v. State (1996)
phrase: "compare"
CitedSmalls v. State (1991)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·LTS v. State, 391 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

state" sufficient to justify a stop under Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1979), Florida's Stop
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityM.M. v. State (2012)
Cited as authorityMM v. State (2012)
Cited as authorityFuentes v. State (2009)
Copy

·Engle v. State, 391 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 13 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

result of the illegal entries, relying on section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1976) and Terry v. Ohio
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLee v. State (2003)
Cited (see also)Williams v. State (1981)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Alvarez v. City of Hialeah, 900 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6509, 2005 WL 1027087

detentions subject to Fourth Amendment scrutiny. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2004); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityPlaisted v. State (2010)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Quote AuthorityGomez v. Village of Pinecrest (2009)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityState v. Arango (2009)
Copy

·Jenkins v. State, 685 So. 2d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 720490

S.Ct. 2366, 124 L.Ed.2d 273 (1993). Under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1995), an officer may temporarily
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJerry Weakley v. State of Florida (2019)
CitedHuffman v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Faunce v. State (2004)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Julian v. State, 528 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 60472

this case cannot sustain such a finding. See § 901.151. To the extent that Zaner can be interpreted to
0 red1 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Wilson v. State (1989)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityJAMES W. JOHNS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
Cited as authorityStokes v. State (1992)
Copy

·State v. Ramos, 378 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Thomas v. State, 250 So.2d 15 (Fla.1st DCA 1971); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1977). A formal arrest, on the other
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityYoung v. State of Florida (2022)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityDenby v. State (1984)
Cited as authorityState v. Thomas (1983)
phrase: "cf."
Copy

·AJM v. State, 746 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 1221651

concerned for his, and his partner's, safety. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1997); Terry, 392 U.S. at 21-27
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityG.M., a Child v. State of Florida (2015)
Cited as authorityL.C. v. State (2009)
Cited as authorityState v. Jardines (2008)
Copy

·Williams v. State, 454 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

pursuant to Florida's Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1983). Specifically, defendant
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPantin v. State (2004)
CitedSapp v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Taylor v. State (1997)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Merklein, 388 So. 2d 218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

investigatory stop under the Stop and Frisk law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977). We think, however
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Leach (2015)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Reid (1999)
Cited as authorityState v. Guzman-Cuellar (1987)
Copy

·State v. Navarro, 464 So. 2d 137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

as is required by the Law for such a stop. See § 901.151, Florida Statutes. 2. The group of men of which
0 red0 yellow14 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Battle (2017)
CitedState v. Ross (2016)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Coleman v. State, 333 So. 2d 503 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

reverse. The Stop and Frisk Statute, Fla. Stat. § 901.151(2) (1975), provides there must be circumstances
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGaston v. City of Leesburg (2024)
Cited (see also)Stinson v. State (2013)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Spann v. State, 529 So. 2d 825 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 84055

to commit a crime justifying a stop under section 901.151, Florida Statutes. Furthermore, based upon
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedClemons v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityWallace v. State (1989)
Copy

·Melendez v. Sheriff of Palm Beach Cnty., 743 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13213, 1999 WL 816988

*1148 Terry, 392 U.S. at 22, 88 S.Ct. 1868 and section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1995), permit a police
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2008)
CitedStudemire v. State (2007)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·King v. State, 696 So. 2d 860 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 231489

validate the subsequent seizure of contraband. See § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1995); Lang v. State, 671 So.2d 292
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CitedCruz v. State (2002)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityC.Q. v. State (2001)
Cited as authorityCQ v. State (2001)
Copy

·Brown v. State, 636 So. 2d 174 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 151371

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1991); Randall v. State, 600 So
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Jones (2016)
CitedMcGowan v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Hernandez v. State (1999)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Spence v. State, 525 So. 2d 442 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 32047

facts. To justify a temporary detention under section 901.151, the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, the officer
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Ashbrook (1998)
phrase: "see also"
CitedState v. Casimono (1991)
phrase: "see"
CitedJenkins v. State (1990)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Robinson, 740 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 147652

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)June v. State (2012)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityBerry v. State (2008)
Cited as authorityGraham v. State (2007)
Copy

·Rios v. State, 975 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2120135

committing, or is about to commit a crime"); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). Furthermore, the reasonable
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Jordan C. Beans (2017)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Moore v. State (2016)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityRichard Scott v. State (2014)
Copy

·Jenkins v. State, 524 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 44492

DCA 1983), approved, 452 So.2d 562 (Fla. 1984); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1987). "A `founded' suspicion is
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityState v. Cruse (2013)
Cited as authorityDees v. State (1990)
CitedBaggett v. State (1988)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Lester v. State, 754 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Cited 9 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 139229

and Frisk Law requires at least as much. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1997). ("Whenever any law enforcement
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State of Florida v. Travis Cornelius Simpson (2025)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityBerry v. State (2008)
Cited as authorityMorris v. State (2001)
Copy

·Baldwin v. State, 418 So. 2d 1219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

bulge in defendant's pocket was a weapon. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981), sets out the procedure
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedJordan v. State (1989)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Thomas v. State (1988)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedState v. Gary (1985)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Cobb v. State, 642 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 502625

robbery. It is well established that under section 901.151, Florida Statutes, to justify a stop or any
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedAlan Dale Coby v. State of Florida (2018)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityBrye v. State (2006)
Cited (see also)Taylor v. State (1997)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Shackelford v. State, 579 So. 2d 306 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 74813

found a baggie containing a trace of cocaine. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1987), authorizes a temporary
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAlbers v. State (2001)
CitedLong v. State (1994)
phrase: "see"
CitedHenry v. State (1994)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Curry v. State, 570 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 183830

to allow an investigative stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989). Spann held that when
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Canada (1998)
phrase: "compare"
CitedPoole v. State (1994)
phrase: "see"
CitedSears v. State (1991)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Ford v. State, 783 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 37703

committing or was about to commit a crime. See § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1997); Popple v. State, 626 So.2d
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJ.H., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
Cited (see also)Mathis v. State (2009)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityChaney v. State (2007)
Copy

·Cocke v. State, 889 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 2725963

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) and section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1995), we noted that
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Socarras (2019)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Socarras (2019)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Pickens (2009)
Copy

·State v. Hunt, 391 So. 2d 760 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

questioning which led to the arrest. Pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979), and Terry v. Ohio
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Paul (1994)
Cited (see also)State v. Harwood (1986)
phrase: "see also"
Cited (see also)Ewing v. State (1985)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Nesmith v. State, 616 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 WL 95538

committing, or is about to commit a crime. Section 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1989). To justify a temporary
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySmith v. State (2007)
Cited as authorityRodriguez v. State (2007)
Quote AuthorityKaigler v. State (2005)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Angaran v. State, 681 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 355048

suspicion that a suspect is armed and dangerous. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1993). See State v. Webb, 398
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEnich v. State (2003)
Cited (see also)McCloud v. State (2001)
phrase: "see also"
CitedWW Contracting, Inc. v. Harrison (2000)
phrase: "see"
Copy

RB v. State, 429 So. 2d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Cited 19 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

committing, or is about to commit a crime. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981); Kearse v. State,
Copy

·Thompson v. State, 405 So. 2d 501 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and section 901.151(1), Florida Statutes (1979). See State v. Payton
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CitedCaplan v. State (1988)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityP.L.R. v. State (1984)
Cited as authorityPLR v. State (1984)
Copy

·Jones v. State, 806 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Cited 8 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 126052

of committing, or are about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1996); Hunter v. State, 660 So
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMichael Crist v. State of Florida (2025)
Quote AuthorityHawk v. State (2003)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityAH v. State (2003)
Copy

·EH v. State, 593 So. 2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 273720

itself was improper. The state's reliance on section 901.151 is misplaced. First, this was not a Terry stop
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityHatcher v. State (2003)
CitedLD v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
CitedL.D. v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Schnick v. State, 362 So. 2d 423 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

probation. The Florida "stop and frisk" law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975) provides in subsection
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDobson v. State (1999)
CitedC.H. v. State (1989)
phrase: "see"
CitedCH v. State (1989)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Francois, 355 So. 2d 127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

this appeal is from that order. We reverse. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975), provides in part
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Doyle (1993)
phrase: "see also"
CitedP. S. D. v. State (1980)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Curry v. State, 532 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 112294

or was about to commit a crime as required by § 901.151, Fla. Stat., and Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityD.N. v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityDN v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityPoole v. State (1994)
Copy

·Smith v. State, 719 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 WL 771419

So.2d 786 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Furthermore, section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1995), requires probable
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityCommonwealth v. Privette (2023)
Cited (see also)Commonwealth v. Yong (2018)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·State v. Callaway, 582 So. 2d 745 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 125724

1, 21, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1989).
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
CitedMARQUESE D. GOODMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
phrase: "accord"
Cited as authorityState v. Nichols (2010)
Cited as authorityA.J.M. v. State (1999)
Copy

·DN v. State, 805 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 54539

a founded suspicion of criminal activity. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2000)(Florida's Stop and Frisk Law)
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLopez v. State (2017)
CitedState v. Zaldivar (2010)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Kelly v. State, 407 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979). Section 810.09, Florida Statutes
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
CitedGergen v. Gergen (2010)
phrase: "see"
CitedParker v. State (1997)
phrase: "accord"
Cited (see also)Dolfi v. Dolfi (1996)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Wilson v. State, 433 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1981). A founded suspicion is a suspicion
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Derkac (1984)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Spurling, 385 So. 2d 672 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

(1968), and Florida's "Stop and Frisk Law", Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977). The trial court was
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Crumpton (1996)
Cited as authorityRosa v. State (1987)
Cited as authorityWatts v. State (1985)
Copy

·RE v. State, 536 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 138508

or were about to commit a crime as required by § 901.151, Fla. Stat., and Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMELISSA PETERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
Cited (see also)State v. Scott (1994)
phrase: "see also"
CitedState v. Walczak (1991)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Bowen v. State, 685 So. 2d 942 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 728341

a crime, the seizure is unreasonable. Popple; § 901.151(2). When an individual is unreasonably seized
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityForman v. State (2013)
Cited as authorityEldridge v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityState v. Murphy (2001)
Copy

·JAR v. State, 689 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 114934

inquiry in the nature of a Terry[2] stop. See § 901.151(2), (5), Fla. Stat. (1993). See also T.J., 538
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
CitedRC v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
CitedR.C. v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityAgo (2002)
Copy

·Shaw v. State, 611 So. 2d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 382645

performing a weapons pat-down pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991), and that the state
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGreen v. State (2002)
CitedState v. Anderson (1999)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityHarvey v. State (1997)
Copy

·Thomasset v. State, 761 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 499375

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1997); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityShively v. State (2011)
Cited as authorityParsons v. State (2002)
Cited (see also)Walls v. State (2002)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·King v. State, 521 So. 2d 334 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 18690

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1983). Although the detention may
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedBeckham v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)State v. Isaacs (1991)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Brown, 616 So. 2d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 WL 86479

encounter at that moment turned into a stop under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991), because Brown was
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDavis v. State (2006)
Cited (see also)Thomas v. State (1994)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedState v. Paul (1994)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Stevens v. State, 354 So. 2d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

of the present case satisfy the function of Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975), and the pronouncements
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Patrick (1983)
Cited as authorityCheatem v. State (1982)
Copy

·State v. Price, 363 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) or contemplated in Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1977).[1] Under either
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Valencia Olaya (1987)
phrase: "compare"
CitedCobb v. State (1979)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)State v. Gamble (1979)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Lecorn v. State, 832 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31486297

that this was a valid pat-down search under section 901.151 and Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Shuttleworth (2006)
CitedThomas v. State (2004)
phrase: "see"
CitedTaylor v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Kehoe, 498 So. 2d 560 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2488

the boat. The Florida Stop and Frisk law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1985), provides in relevant
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLightfoot v. State (1998)
CitedPierre-Louis v. State (1996)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Jones v. State (1990)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. King, 405 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, 379 So.2d 121 (Fla. 5th DCA 1979). [2] § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979). [3] See New York v. Belton
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. MAD (1998)
Cited as authorityState v. In the Interest of M.A.D. (1998)
CitedFortney v. State (1987)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Murphy v. State, 512 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2075

stop within the stop and frisk law, Florida Section 901.151 and Terry vs. Ohio. The components of that
0 red2 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"KGM v. State (2002)
phrase: "but see"
Cited "but see"K.G.M. v. State (2002)
phrase: "but see"
CitedBrewer v. State (1990)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Williams v. State, 769 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1224751

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1997); Curtis v. State, 748 So.2d
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityRachel v. State (2008)
Cited as authorityGillis v. State (2006)
Cited as authorityCartwright v. State (2006)
Copy

·Riley v. State, 266 So. 2d 173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972).

Cited 11 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

stop and interrogate appellant by virtue of Section 901.151, F.S. 1969, F.S.A., we are satisfied that the
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Manuel (1987)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Johnson v. State, 433 So. 2d 648 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

appellant under the "stop and frisk law", Section 901.151, Florida Statutes... . The above-related circumstances
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState of Florida v. Scott (2026)
CitedState v. Young (2006)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)State v. Garcia (1997)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Hunt v. State, 700 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 605811

believe that the subject is an armed threat. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1995); State v. Webb, 398 So.2d
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMcNeil v. State (2008)
Cited as authorityDLJ v. State (2006)
Cited as authorityD.L.J. v. State (2006)
Copy

·Davis v. State, 606 So. 2d 460 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 277252

or is about to commit a criminal offense. Section 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1989). An investigatory stop
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedLee v. State (2004)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·BT v. State, 702 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 715648

justify a pat-down under section 901.151, Florida Statutes. Section 901.151, also known as the "Florida
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedRehm v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityLD v. State (2000)
Cited as authorityL.D. v. State (2000)
Copy

·Jaudon v. State, 749 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 6064

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityR.R. v. State (2014)
Cited as authorityT.R.T. v. State (2008)
Cited as authorityTRT v. State (2008)
Copy

·Donaldson v. State, 803 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Cited 6 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 106

State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993) (citing § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1991)); Tamer, 463 So.2d at 1239.
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityGarner v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue (2022)
Cited as authorityJoanne Baden v. State of Florida (2015)
CitedLJS v. State (2005)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Gifford, 558 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 17498

675, 105 S.Ct. 1568, 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1987). Even assuming that a reasonable
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityReza v. State (2015)
Cited as authorityWillingham v. City of Orlando (2006)
Cited as authorityJibory v. City of Jacksonville (2005)
Copy

·Mitchell v. State, 558 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 12750

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1987). Although the detention may
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBautista v. State (2005)
CitedCrew v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
Quote AuthorityChase v. State (1995)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Jamison v. State, 455 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

subjected to a stop and frisk pursuant to Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981). The facts were insufficient
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. CHARLES MORRIS (2020)
Cited as authorityG.M., a Child v. State of Florida (2015)
Cited as authorityState v. Smith (2002)
Copy

·DLJ v. State, 932 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1667350

seizure of the magazine and the gun violated section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (2004), and the constitutions
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityKS v. State (2012)
Cited as authorityCaldwell v. State (2010)
Cited as authorityBallenger v. State (2009)
Copy

·Robinson v. State, 976 So. 2d 1229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 818817

committing, or is about to commit a crime. Id.; see § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2005) ("Florida Stop and Frisk Law")
0 red0 yellow13 green0 procedural
CitedN.J. v. State (2019)
phrase: "see"
CitedN.J. v. State (2019)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityDelvin Dawson v. State of Florida (2018)
Copy

·Kayes v. State, 409 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 10 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

v. Payton, 344 So.2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979). Thus, the legality of the
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedTennyson v. State (1985)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Bryant v. State, 779 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 7 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1580391

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1999); Popple, 626 So.2d at 186;
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Colin Taylor Theobald (2023)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2005)
Cited as authorityState v. Gibson (2005)
Copy

·State v. Gamble, 370 So. 2d 428 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977). In effect, it is
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Delgado (1981)
Cited (see also)LTS v. State (1980)
phrase: "compare"
Cited (see also)L. T. S. v. State (1980)
phrase: "compare"
Copy

·Carter v. State, 370 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Cited 7 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

considered in conjunction with Florida Statutes, Section 901.151 (Florida Stop and Frisk Law) or compared with
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Graham v. State (1986)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityCommonwealth v. Rehmeyer (1985)
CitedState v. Wright (1981)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Harris v. State, 574 So. 2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 10433

justify a temporary stop in accordance with section 901.151, Florida Statutes. The predicate foundation
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityD.L.J. v. State (2006)
Cited as authorityDLJ v. State (2006)
Copy

·Koppelman v. State, 876 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1335914

enough to support a stop. 626 So.2d at 186 (citing § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991)); Carter v. State, 454 So.2d
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
CitedG.M. v. State (2008)
phrase: "see"
CitedGM v. State (2008)
phrase: "see"
CitedBlake v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Frazier v. State, 789 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 753812

afoot. Terry, 392 U.S. at 30, 88 S.Ct. 1868; § 901.151(1), Fla. Stat. (2000). The determination of reasonable
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
CitedWynn v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
CitedCrawford v. State (2007)
phrase: "see"
CitedBravo v. State (2007)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·PBP v. State, 955 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1223854

grabbed P.B.P. and pulled him out of the house. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (2004), which governs
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityK.O., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
Cited as authorityA.J.R. v. State (2016)
Copy

·Gartrell v. State, 609 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 341953

Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), or under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991), even to do a patdown
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityThames v. State (2017)
Cited as authorityLee v. State (2002)
CitedChicone v. State (1996)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Hall v. State, 366 So. 2d 865 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

was not authorized by the Stop and Frisk Law, § 901.151 Fla. Stat., or by the Retail Theft Detention and
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMELISSA PETERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
Cited as authorityMajors v. State (2011)
Cited (see also)Franklin v. State (1979)
phrase: "compare"
Copy

·State, Dept. of Hwy. Saf. v. Haskins, 752 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 1128819

In Taylor, the supreme court stated that section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1991),[1] permits a law
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Rose (2012)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityState v. Ameqrane (2010)
CitedOrigi v. State (2005)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Brown v. State, 224 So. 3d 806 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2017 WL 3316914, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11260

have justified a pat-down search pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (2015). See McCloud v. State
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
CitedMichael Crist v. State of Florida (2025)
phrase: "accord"
CitedTOJARRE J. NELSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·EAB v. State, 964 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2781134

S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2005) (authorizing investigatory
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
CitedThomas v. State (2014)
phrase: "see"
CitedMaldonado v. State (2008)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityJLH v. State (2008)
Copy

·Cox v. State, 975 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 595925

we address the traffic stop and detention. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (2006), states: Whenever
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Smith (2015)
Cited as authorityState v. Toussaint (2015)
Copy

·TP v. State, 585 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 159161

GRIFFIN, Judge, dissenting. Subsection 5 of section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989) provides: (5) Whenever
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
CitedDobson v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
CitedPierre v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityPoole v. State (1994)
Copy

·State v. Davis, 849 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21459598

19-23, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889(1968); § 901.151(2) Fla. Stat. (2002). An officer must have an
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Castaneda (2011)
Copy

·Goss v. State, 744 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 992690

committing or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151. While an investigatory stop was justified under
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityState of Iowa v. James Dow Flanagan (2021)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Askerooth (2004)
CitedPerez v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Griggs v. State, 994 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 4889129

effect an arrest — for further consideration. Section 901.151(3), Florida Statutes (2007), entitled "Stop
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJahquell Davis v. State (2018)
Cited as authorityState v. Hannah (2012)
Copy

·Moore v. State, 874 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 5 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1057646

suspicion that the individual is armed with a weapon. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2003); State v. Webb, 398 So.2d
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedE.J. v. State (2010)
phrase: "see"
CitedEJ v. State (2010)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Varnedoe, 443 So. 2d 201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

he was transported to Young's home and that section 901.151(3), Florida Statutes (1981)[*] precluded transporting
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMarkeith Thomas v. State of Florida (2025)
Cited as authorityState v. McCormack (1987)
CitedState v. Goldman (1986)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Thomas v. State, 533 So. 2d 861 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 113144

Thomas under the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1985). Thomas argues that
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLencsak v. State (1991)
CitedState v. Raines (1991)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityHill v. State (1990)
Copy

·Bartlett v. State, 508 So. 2d 567 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1519

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). The factual settings giving
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedWallace v. State (2007)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityParsons v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityOzhuwan v. State (1990)
Copy

·Phillips v. State, 781 So. 2d 477 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 246080

761 So.2d 383, 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); see also § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1997); Terry; Saturnino-Boudet v.
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (2025)
Cited as authorityState v. Reyes (2009)
Cited as authorityFarag v. United States (2008)
Copy

·Rinehart v. State, 778 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 1879818

articulable suspicion of criminal activity. See § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1997); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1,
0 red0 yellow8 green0 procedural
CitedMusallam v. State (2014)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityS.K.W. v. State (2013)
Cited as authoritySimms v. State (2011)
Copy

·State v. Isaacs, 578 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 65952

his seizure of the cocaine rocks was lawful. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1989), in pertinent part
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityK.G.M. v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityKGM v. State (2002)
Cited (see also)In re the Interest of M.C. (1994)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·McCreary v. State, 538 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 16620

State, 491 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). See § 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987). In determining whether
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMajors v. State (2011)
phrase: "cf."
Cited as authorityHarrelson v. State (1995)
CitedDees v. State (1990)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·In Interest of Gar, 387 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

the police exceeded their authority under Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977), Florida's stop and
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityM.E.S. v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityGoelet v. State (1996)
CitedMcCant v. State (1987)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Delgado, 402 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979) to support a temporary
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Reyes (1996)
Cited as authorityHarper v. State (1988)
Cited (see also)State v. Augustyn (1986)
phrase: "compare"
Copy

·State v. Cruse, 121 So. 3d 91 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 4823147, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14468

commit a crime in order to support the detention. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2011).2 *96Because this level
Copy

·Panter v. State, 8 So. 3d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 4316, 2009 WL 1230678

investigate whether a drug offense had occurred. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2007) ("Stop and Frisk Law");
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMartin v. State (2014)
Cited as authorityMacKendrick v. State (2013)
CitedSmith v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Tamer v. State, 463 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 473

codified in the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1983). Under that statute
0 red1 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"State v. Fuksman (1985)
phrase: "but see"
Cited as authorityDonaldson v. State (2002)
Cited (see also)American Samoa Government v. Samana (1988)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·McNeil v. State, 746 So. 2d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 1127621

is committing or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1997)[4]; Terry; Popple v. State
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
CitedOliver v. State (2015)
phrase: "accord"
CitedMaldonado v. State (2008)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityDavis v. State (2006)
Copy

·Baker v. State, 316 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

requirements of the "stop and frisk law", Section 901.151, Florida Statutes. A citizen, who had just
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityT.P. v. State (1991)
Cited as authorityTP v. State (1991)
Cited as authorityConner v. State (1977)
Copy

·Williams v. State, 294 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

to recite Florida Statute 901.151, F.S.A., the "Florida Stop and Frisk Law." F.S. 901.151, F.S.A. requires
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedJordan v. State (1989)
phrase: "see"
Copy

State v. Carrillo, 506 So. 2d 495 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1184

may establish probable cause for arrest. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1985); see also Bailey v. State,
Copy

·Davis v. State, 744 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 1036290

then is whether the detention was illegal. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1997), permits an officer
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPatrick Jackson v. State of Florida (2016)
CitedFaulkner v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityFindley v. State (2000)
Copy

·Johnson v. State, 696 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 364519

established by Florida's Stop and Frisk Law. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995). See also Smith v. State, 592
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityG.M., a Child v. State of Florida (2015)
CitedCox v. State (2008)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Pritchett v. State, 677 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 168614

a founded suspicion of criminal activity. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989); Terry. A founded
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityS.S., a child v. State (2015)
Cited (see also)McMaster v. State (2001)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited (see also)State v. OS (2000)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Estep v. State, 597 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 72018

cocaine and heroin inside the vehicle. Under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989), an officer must have
0 red0 yellow12 green0 procedural
CitedBales v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
CitedMundhenk v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityHart v. State (1998)
Copy

·Raleigh v. State, 404 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

crime before he may lawfully detain such person. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979); State v. Stevens, 354 So.2d
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedHarvey v. State (1997)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Vanacker (1988)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Walden, 464 So. 2d 691 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 626

in seizing the weapon and arresting Walden. Section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1983); Herring v. State
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Hollingshead (2008)
Cited as authorityState v. Collins (1995)
Copy

·Wilson v. State, 324 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

decision in this case requires an interpretation of § 901.151, F.S. 1973, commonly known as the "Stop and Frisk
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedCrespo v. State (1978)
phrase: "see"
CitedLaster v. State (1978)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Piantadosi v. State, 311 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

situation presented in this case. See, Fla. Stat. § 901.151(2), (6); see also, State v. Miller, Fla.App. 1972
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedUnited States v. Yandell (1982)
phrase: "see"
CitedSmith v. State (1978)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·MacKey v. State, 83 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 832836, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4063

S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Fla. Stat. § 901.151(2)(1997) ("Florida Stop and Frisk Law"). 3. A
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCommonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt. (2019)
Cited as authorityMackey v. State (2013)
Copy

·Partlow v. State, 134 So. 3d 1027 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 45743, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 78

103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983)); see § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2009) (setting out the circumstances
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAlan Dale Coby v. State of Florida (2018)
Copy

·CNH v. State, 927 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 357889

seizure was not performed in compliance with section 901.151, because school personnel had no reasonable
0 red0 yellow11 green0 procedural
CitedC.W. v. State (2016)
phrase: "see"
CitedC.W. v. State (2016)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Sanders v. State, 385 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

not valid under the Florida Stop and Frisk law. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979). Detectives Pasto and Johnson
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityNickell v. State (1998)
Cited as authorityLencsak v. State (1991)
Cited as authorityThomas v. State (1988)
Copy

·Walker v. City of Pompano Beach, 763 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 2000 WL 36284

are committing, or are about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). A "mere" or "bare" suspicion
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)KEVIN LAMONT SAMMIEL v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2017)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityState of Florida v. Pharoh Jemison (2015)
Cited (see also)Sapp v. State (2000)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Harford v. State, 816 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 971357

20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and later cases, and section 901.151, Florida Statutes. The sole witness testifying
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedT.G. v. State (2015)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Johnson v. State (2008)
phrase: "see also"
CitedIngram v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Falls v. State, 953 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 911758

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityR.J.C. v. State (2012)
Cited as authorityRozzo v. State (2011)
Cited as authorityFerguson v. State (2011)
Copy

·Love v. State, 706 So. 2d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 WL 67105

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). A hunch or bare suspicion
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityTERRI ALLENBRAND v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
Cited as authoritySantiago v. State (2014)
Cited as authorityMcDavid v. State (2004)
Copy

·Greider v. State, 977 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 900302

articulable suspicion of criminal activity. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2005) (authorizing an investigatory
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. ROBERT BODRATO (2022)
Copy

Regalado v. State, 25 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Cited 10 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19620, 2009 WL 4827513

committing, or is about to commit a crime. Id.; § 901.151, Fla. Stat. The trial court relied on Baptiste
Copy

·Smith v. State, 637 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 203719

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991); Randall v. State, 600 So.2d
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySinclair v. State (2002)
CitedGoss v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityTurner v. State (1996)
Copy

·State v. Ramos, 598 So. 2d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 98266

affirmative. Under the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1989), an officer may temporarily
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Wilburn (2012)
Cited (see also)State v. Diaz (2003)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Quote AuthorityO'NEAL v. State (1995)
Copy

·Enich v. State, 838 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 729244

suspicion that the detainee is armed and dangerous. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2001); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Maxwell (2018)
Cited as authorityState v. Cruse (2013)
Copy

·State v. Johnson, 696 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 303247

crime. Therefore, this was not a Terry stop. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1993); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CitedKennard v. State (2005)
phrase: "see"
CitedWoods v. State (2005)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Cooks v. State, 28 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 991, 2010 WL 532506

State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993)); see also § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). "`Reasonable suspicion
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Jerry Weakley v. State of Florida (2019)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityMELISSA PETERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
phrase: "cf."
Cited as authorityMajors v. State (2011)
phrase: "cf."
Copy

·Redfin v. State, 453 So. 2d 425 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Webb at 822. Florida's stop and frisk law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981), requires probable
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedW.R.A. v. State (1986)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Cook (1985)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·LD v. State, 770 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 827009

the safety of others, was in danger. See id.; § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1997). The state asserts that
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMattos v. State (2016)
Cited as authorityT.M. v. State (2010)
Cited as authorityTM v. State (2010)
Copy

·State v. DeLUCA, 40 So. 3d 120 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10453, 2010 WL 2795381

reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2008); Terry, 392 U.S. at 24-26
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
CitedState of Florida v. Milton (2025)
phrase: "see"
CitedState of Florida v. L. C. (2024)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Thames v. State, 592 So. 2d 733 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 858

suspect is entitled to immediate release. See § 901.151(3), Fla. Stat. (1989); Florida v. Royer, 460 U
0 red0 yellow7 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGoodman v. State (1999)
CitedState v. In the Interest of M.A.D. (1998)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. MAD (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·St. John v. State, 356 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

necessary to disclose the presence of a weapon. Section 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1975); Williams v. State, 294
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLara v. State (1986)
Copy

·DBP v. State, 31 So. 3d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2010 WL 979481

a threat to the officer or any other person. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2009). In J.L., however, the Florida
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityReginald Greenwich v. State (2016)
Copy

·Abraham v. State, 532 So. 2d 91 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 107126

Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). The acts of driving out
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Manuel v. State (2006)
phrase: "see also"
Cited (see also)Silverman v. State (1992)
phrase: "see also"
CitedProkop v. State (1990)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Wilhelm v. State, 515 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2657

Codie v. State, 406 So.2d 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1985). A mere or bare suspicion is
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedDoctor v. State (1992)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityLemon v. State (1991)
Cited as authorityPorcher v. State (1989)
Copy

·Ottney v. State, 571 So. 2d 20 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 96201

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1985); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedGrant v. State (1992)
phrase: "see"
CitedBristol v. State (1991)
phrase: "see"
CitedShackelford v. State (1991)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Cubby v. State, 707 So. 2d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 WL 23215

believe that the subject is an armed threat. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1995); State v. Webb, 398 So.2d
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Augustus v. State (2000)
phrase: "see also"
CitedMcElwain v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Coleman v. State (1999)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Marrero, 890 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

Cited 4 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 120363

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1997); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Strickroth v. State (2007)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityParrish v. State (2006)
Cited as authorityState v. Lopez (2006)
Copy

·James v. State, 556 So. 2d 791 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 10892

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989). Appellant challenges
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJonavon D. Gaines v. State (2015)
Quote AuthoritySanders v. State (1996)
phrase: "see also"
CitedState v. Fleming (1995)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Batie v. State, 593 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 25817

151(2) and 322.32(1), Florida Statutes (1989). Section 901.151(2) provides: Whenever any law enforcement officer
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySaturnino-Boudet v. State (1996)
Cited as authoritySaturnino-Boudet v. State (1996)
Cited (see also)State v. Pugh (1994)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Premo v. State, 610 So. 2d 72 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 362127

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1989). The state concedes
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMarshall v. State (2002)
Cited as authorityMcCloud v. State (2001)
CitedSutton v. State (1997)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Romanello v. State, 365 So. 2d 220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, 337 So.2d 1031, 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1975). Instead, the officers had
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedState v. TP (2003)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. T.P. (2003)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Moody (1991)
Copy

·Ward v. State, 453 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

to justify even an investigative stop under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1983). Nothing that transpires
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedSlydell v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Hunter (1993)
CitedHarris v. State (1989)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Whitley v. State, 349 So. 2d 840 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

circumstances did not meet the standards of Section 901.151, Florida Statutes, the detention was invalid
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·State v. Hendry, 309 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Cited 9 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

appropriate police response." The passage of Fla. Stat. § 901.151 (1973), commonly known as the "Stop and Frisk"
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·State v. Ameqrane, 39 So. 3d 339 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7037, 2010 WL 2010804

i.e., DUI. The officer was entitled under section 901.151 to conduct a reasonable inquiry to confirm
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State of Florida v. Michelle Lynn Howard (2025)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityState of Florida v. Kevin Tyson (2024)
Cited (see also)STATE OF FLORIDA v. ELIANA VELASCO (2023)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Hewitt, 495 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2054

authorized by "Florida Stop and Frisk Law", F.S. 901.151 (1979). When Maxwell took defendant's driver's
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCastillo v. State (1988)
Cited (see also)Peterson v. State (1987)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State Dhsmv v. Killen, 667 So. 2d 433 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 23494

incident to a lawful arrest, but which came under section 901.151(5), Florida *436 Statutes (1993) (Florida stop
Copy

·Tinson v. State, 650 So. 2d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 WL 51097

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1993). Further, founded suspicion
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityRamirez v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
CitedBerard v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Kollmer v. State, 977 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 762540

was involved in the commission of a crime. See § 901.151(2), Fla Stat. (2006). In U.S. v. Sokolow, 490
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CitedM.J. v. State (2013)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityGriggs v. State (2008)
Copy

·Brown v. State, 592 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 15902

crack cocaine hidden in the appellant's mouth. Section 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1989), Florida Stop and Frisk
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Reyes (2009)
Cited as authorityState v. Lennon (2007)
Cited as authorityHernandez v. State (1999)
Copy

·Brown v. State, 714 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 WL 438806

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a citizen's
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGentles v. State (2010)
Cited (see also)Navamuel v. State (2009)
phrase: "see also"
Cited (see also)DeLorenzo v. State (2006)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Persaud v. State, 659 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 WL 497112

an investigatory stop of the automobile. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1993). Defendant next contends that
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMaynard v. State (1999)
Cited as authorityState v. Clark (1998)
Cited (see also)State v. Gonzalez (1996)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Paff v. State, 884 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1809868

reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2002); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHill v. State (2011)
Cited (see also)Doe v. State (2008)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited as authorityCunningham v. State (2004)
Copy

·Hamilton v. State, 597 So. 2d 417 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 WL 81055

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991), is a two-step process
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCampuzano v. State (2000)
Cited as authorityState v. Burns (1997)
CitedIn the Interest of J.L. (1993)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Harrelson v. State, 662 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 WL 642672

committing, or were about to commit a crime." § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1993); McCreary v. State, 538 So
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedIppolito v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Woodard, 280 So. 2d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

question regarding the "stop-and-frisk law," F.S. § 901.151, F.S.A., has been succinctly and clearly discussed
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Brooks (1973)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Salem v. State, 645 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 575457

Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla. 1993); § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1991). Mere or bare suspicion is not
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLJS v. State (2005)
Cited as authorityL.J.S. v. State (2005)
Cited as authorityCooper v. State (1995)
Copy

·White v. State, 737 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 495487

is about to commit a crime. See id.; see also § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). The testimony at the suppression
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedTERRI ALLENBRAND v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityGriffin v. State (2001)
Copy

·State v. Augustyn, 490 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1047

criminal activity or else the stop is illegal. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1977); Whitley v. State, 349 So.2d
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Leach (2015)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityHighsmith v. State (2003)
CitedRogers v. State (1991)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·GAM v. State, 780 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 245948

1992). Under Florida's "Stop and Frisk Law," section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1997), law enforcement officers
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityRachel v. State (2008)
CitedJorquera v. State (2004)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityIppolito v. State (2001)
Copy

·Davis v. State, 67 So. 3d 1125 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11410, 2011 WL 2923699

or is about to commit a crime. Id.; see also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2009). The officer's suspicion must
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityMaye v. United States (2021)
Cited (see also)State v. Herron (2011)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Brown v. State, 687 So. 2d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 695286

and seizure of the evidence was violative of section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1995) [Stop and Frisk Law]
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedWilliams v. State (2005)
phrase: "accord"
Cited as authorityLugo v. State (2004)
Cited (see also)Graham v. State (1998)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Price v. State, 318 So. 2d 468 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

appellant under the "stop and frisk law", Section 901.151, Florida Statutes. That statute provides in
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedMC v. State (1984)
phrase: "see"
CitedM.C. v. State (1984)
phrase: "see"
CitedKaiser v. State (1976)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Walker, 991 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 3851695

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); see also Terry, 392 U.S
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityVan Teamer v. State (2013)
Cited as authorityAders v. State (2011)
Cited as authorityState v. Hebert (2009)
Copy

·Williams v. State, 910 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 WL 2253895

v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993); see also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2003). A founded suspicion is: one
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityD.T., a Child v. State of Florida (2015)
Quote AuthorityCollins v. State (2013)
Cited as authorityD.L. v. State (2012)
Copy

·DO v. State, 77 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2011 WL 6373008

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2011) [3] In recognizing these differences
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityA.J.R. v. State (2016)
Cited as authorityA.J.R. v. State (2016)
Copy

·Price v. State, 120 So. 3d 198 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 4483061, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13452

that it *200was based on reasonable suspicion. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2010); Arvizu; United States v. Mendenhall
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)JASON HASSAN BAXTER vs STATE OF FLORIDA (2023)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedTimothy E. Burnett v. State (2018)
phrase: "see"
Quote AuthorityState v. James H. Watson (2016)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Leach v. State, 957 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9024, 2007 WL 1647676

probable cause to conduct a pat-down search under section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (2005),1 the Florida Stop
0 red0 yellow21 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityNorman v. State (2017)
Copy

·State v. Miller, 267 So. 2d 352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

and justified under the provisions of F.S. Section 901.151, F.S.A., commonly known as the "stop and frisk
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Piantadosi v. State (1975)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Howard v. State, 623 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 WL 356917

indicate a person has violated a criminal law. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). Officer Walker's observation
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2009)
Copy

·State v. Bartee, 568 So. 2d 523 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 157749

were insufficient to justify a stop under section 901.151, Florida Statutes. In view of the unlawful
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Anderson v. State (1991)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Harris v. State, 641 So. 2d 126 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 267926

Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), codified section 901.151, Florida Statutes. We further find that pursuant
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityHubbard v. State (1995)
Copy

·State v. EDR, 959 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1789299

Further, the seizure was not pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (2005), Florida's Stop and
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Hill (2011)
Cited as authorityState v. Jardines (2008)
Copy

·Jacoby v. State, 851 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 21918798

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2001); Popple, 626 So.2d at 186;
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Davis v. State (2017)
phrase: "see, e.g."
CitedAgreda v. State (2014)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityWallace v. State (2007)
Copy

·Spikes v. State, 781 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 326668

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat.; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct
0 red0 yellow5 green0 procedural
CitedEAB v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
CitedE.A.B. v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Gonzalez (2003)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Holmes v. State, 549 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 117124

frisk the driver and occupants pursuant to section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1987), and Terry v. Ohio
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedSwartz v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityButler v. State (1994)
Copy

·Burnett v. State, 644 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 583281

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151. Fla. Stat. (1991); Randall v. State, 600 So.2d
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedBeckham v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityPhillips v. State (2001)
Copy

·Pierre-Louis v. State, 682 So. 2d 669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 637649

1211, 103 S.Ct. 1206, 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983); § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1993). We have considered Moore
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedSmith v. State (2002)
phrase: "see"
CitedSapp v. State (2000)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Harvey v. State, 703 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 694930

directions. ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 901.151, Fla. Stat.(1995). [2] "The meaning of `probable
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityG.M., a Child v. State of Florida (2015)
Cited (see also)Dewberry v. State (2005)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Hochstetler v. State, 400 So. 2d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

authorized under the Florida stop and frisk law. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979). The initial investigatory
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Lamb (1986)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Hamilton (1982)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·JRH v. State, 428 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

the scope of the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981). That section authorizes
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityR.A.S. v. State (2014)
Cited (see also)Jenkins v. State (1996)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·LaFontaine v. State, 749 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Cited 3 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2000 WL 35828

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1997); Popple v. State, 626 So
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityIppolito v. State (2001)
Cited (see also)Ransom v. State (2000)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Gadsden v. State, 498 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2650

investigatory stop under the Florida Stop and Frisk law. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1985); see Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedChambers v. State (1997)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Pickersgill v. State (1987)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Phillips v. State, 284 So. 2d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

turned out to be the pistol in question. See F.S. § 901.151 F.S.A. and Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·GM v. State, 981 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 1809317

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a
0 red0 yellow17 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityGM v. State (2009)
CitedG.M. v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·D.H. v. State, 121 So. 3d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14158, 2013 WL 4734572

was codified by the Florida legislature in section 901.151 of the Florida Statutes. See State v. Webb
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Maxwell (2018)
Cited as authorityAbraham v. State (2015)
Quote AuthorityState v. J.J., a child (2014)
Copy

·Brevick v. State, 965 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2890086

State, 792 So.2d 667, 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2006).[2] "Whether an officer's
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBilly Pickard v. State of Florida (2025)
Cited as authorityK.O., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
Quote AuthoritySmith v. State (2012)
Copy

·Bellamy v. State, 696 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 282352

that he was committing a criminal offense. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). Probable cause to arrest
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState of Florida v. L. C. (2024)
Cited (see also)Conyers v. State (2015)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authoritySwartz v. State (2003)
Copy

·State v. Bell, 873 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2004 WL 1057807

committing, or is about to commit a crime. Id.; § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2001). When the Wildlife officer
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Amison v. State (2009)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited as authorityJames v. State (2006)
Cited as authorityState v. Shuttleworth (2006)
Copy

·State v. Boulia, 522 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 24170

product of an impermissible weapons search under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1985),[1] since Brown had
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. McCray (1993)
CitedState v. Crawford (1990)
phrase: "see"
CitedBaggett v. State (1990)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Gonzalez, 840 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 WL 1239970

State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993)). See also § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). A "`reasonable suspicion'
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityR.R. v. State (2014)
Cited (see also)Santiago v. State (2014)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityDoe v. State (2008)
Copy

·RR v. State, 715 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 WL 430355

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). See also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1997). Once the officer determined
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySantiago v. State (2012)
CitedState v. Nichols (2010)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Dewberry v. State (2005)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Stalling v. State, 678 So. 2d 843 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 WL 419033

conducted in violation of the stop and frisk law, section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes, and article I, section
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEstevez v. State (2005)
CitedEverette v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
CitedCopeland v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·JMC v. State, 962 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2119157

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySNJ v. State (2009)
Cited as authorityS.N.J. v. State (2009)
CitedRodriguez v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·LKB v. State, 697 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 400112

1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995). The officer in this case had
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJMC v. State (2007)
Cited as authorityJ.M.C. v. State (2007)
Copy

·Smith v. State, 574 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 16310

has committed or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1989) (Florida Stop and Frisk Law)
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Laina (2015)
CitedHoover v. State (2004)
phrase: "see"
CitedGuffey v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Jain v. State, 577 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 53541

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1989); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
CitedM.D. v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
CitedMD v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityBeckham v. State (2006)
Copy

·McClamma v. State, 138 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 1871510, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6939

to person or property is an element. Under section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (2011), an officer can
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedBenny Saintil v. State of Florida (2025)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)R.A., A JUVENILE v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (2023)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityEllis v. State (2015)
Copy

·State v. Harwood, 488 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1175

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1985). See also State v. Hunt
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityAlan v. State (2010)
Cited (see also)Gelman v. State (1987)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Keeling v. State, 929 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 1541248

State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993) (citing § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1991))[2]; Morrow v. State, 848
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityT.T.N. v. State (2010)
Cited as authorityTTN v. State (2010)
Cited as authorityMarin v. State (2009)
Copy

·Howell v. State, 725 So. 2d 429 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 44084

revealing the presence of the firearm. Under section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1995), an officer must
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedDawson v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
CitedMarshall v. State (2002)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityHarris v. State (2001)
Copy

·Romanoff v. State, 391 So. 2d 783 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

was no founded suspicion for the stop under Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1979) and no probable
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedGibson v. State (1986)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Crooks (1986)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)State v. Webb (1981)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Gomez v. State, 517 So. 2d 110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1987 WL 3373

involves determining the defendant's identity. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1985); Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityDA v. State (2009)
Quote AuthorityD.A. v. State (2009)
Cited as authorityState v. Allende (2001)
Copy

·EJ v. State, 40 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 WL 3023327

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and section 901.151, Florida Statutes, permit an officer to detain
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityF.C. v. State (2016)
Cited as authorityF.C. v. State (2016)
Cited as authorityState v. Watana (2010)
Copy

·Clayton v. State, 616 So. 2d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

founded suspicion necessary to justify a stop. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityFEH, JR. v. State (2010)
CitedD.G. v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
CitedDG v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·MAH v. State, 559 So. 2d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 41245

scope permitted under section 901.151, Fla. Stat.," and we agree. Section 901.151 is the "Florida Stop
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State of Florida v. Travis Cornelius Simpson (2025)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityLester v. State (2000)
CitedShaw v. State (1992)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Ingram v. State, 264 So. 2d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

The appellant calls the court's attention to Section 901.151, F.S. 1969, F.S.A., and contends that this
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Bennett v. State, 344 So. 2d 315 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

justified under the Florida Stop and Frisk Law (Section 901.151, F.S.) nor did it comply with case law construing
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Smith v. State, 95 So. 3d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 3537226, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13621

articulable suspicion of criminal activity.” Id.; see § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (permitting investigatory detention
0 red0 yellow10 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State of Florida (2025)
Cited (see also)Moore v. State (2016)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityState v. Vinci (2014)
Copy

·Bruno v. State, 704 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 716072

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). And see § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995).
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Murphy (2001)
Copy

·Kindell v. State, 562 So. 2d 422 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 79112

policy, it does not comply with existing law. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987) requires that before
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityEnich v. State (2003)
Copy

·Neely v. State, 402 So. 2d 477 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

to make a frisk for their own safety under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979). Of course, at the
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Gerald Eugene Kiser v. Commonwealth (2006)
phrase: "compare"
Copy

·Lewis v. State, 382 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

suspicion," then the Florida Stop and Frisk law, section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1979), gives the authority
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Abraham (1993)
phrase: "compare"
Copy

·Dobson v. State, 737 So. 2d 590 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 436810

defendant merely cited the stop and frisk law, section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes. In order to preserve
0 red0 yellow9 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Dyson (2024)
Cited as authorityJune v. State (2012)
Cited as authorityState v. Nichols (2010)
Copy

·MAP v. State, 403 So. 2d 1384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

crime before he may lawfully detain such person. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979); State v. Stevens, 354 So.2d
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedHarford v. State (2002)
phrase: "see"
CitedL.B. v. State (1985)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Parrish v. State, 937 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2714271

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2004); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityMD v. State (2011)
Cited as authorityM.D. v. State (2011)
Copy

·Wilson v. State, 707 So. 2d 893 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 WL 96747

is about to commit a violation of the law. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995). The facts present in the instant
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedBeckham v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
CitedStiffler v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Zaldivar, 34 So. 3d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4194, 2010 WL 1224480

provided probable cause for Zaldivar’s arrest. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2006). IV. Conclusion Had Zaldivar
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedJP v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
CitedJ.P. v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Nichols, 52 So. 3d 793 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 20137, 2010 WL 5391539

So.2d 963, 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); see also § 901.151(5) Fla. Stat. (2009). Probable cause in the protective
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityZ.S.F., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida (2025)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Williams (2013)
Copy

·State v. Herron, 68 So. 3d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12526, 2011 WL 3477030

suspect is armed with a dangerous weapon. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2009); Richardson, 599 So.2d at
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Copy

·RLL v. State, 466 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 951

appellant under the Stop and Frisk Statute, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1983). We disagree with
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Wilson (1998)
phrase: "see"
CitedGriffin v. State (1996)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Timothy Davis, Sr. v. City of Apopka (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Aug 11, 2021

ble suspicion of criminal activity. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2017). Then, if there
0 red0 yellow74 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityCorey Kendig v. Nicholas Stolar (2026)
Quote Authority(citing case) (2026)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Griffin v. State, 150 So. 3d 288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18957, 2014 WL 6478646

confirm or refute his or her suspicions. See § 901.151(2)-(4), Fla. Stat.; June, 131 So.3d at 6. And
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Copy

·LEROY v. State, 982 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2228864

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2007). A reasonable suspicion of
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityR.F., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2020)
Cited as authorityState v. Jones (2014)
Cited as authorityB.L. v. State (2012)
Copy

·Alvarez v. State, 695 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 WL 282356

believe he was committing or had committed a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). Certainly, they were justified
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Woodson v. State, 579 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 77667

committing or were about to commit a criminal offense. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1989). See Curry v. State, 570
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Bolinger v. State, 576 So. 2d 875 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 38142

commit a crime justifying a stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989). Peabody v. State
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·State v. Brock, 426 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

violated neither constitutional standards nor section 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1981). We agree and reverse. At
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Phillips v. State, 360 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

bulge] was in the place a wallet might be at." F.S. 901.151, recognizes the principles set forth in Terry
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Jahquell Davis v. State, 253 So. 3d 1234 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2014);
Copy

·Carpenter v. State, 403 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

(1968) and Florida's "Stop and Frisk" law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979). The appellant also
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedHorvitz v. State (1983)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·QEG v. State, 569 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 175050

Hughes, 562 So.2d 795, 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1989). A bare suspicion of illegal
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityStanton v. State (1991)
Copy

·State v. King, 485 So. 2d 1312 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 573

contemplated by Florida's stop and frisk law (F.S. 901.151) nor under the case law evolving from Terry
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Malone (1999)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Hall, 652 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 WL 124680

down violative of Florida's Stop and Frisk Law. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1993). The trial court further found
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityJohnson v. State (1997)
Copy

·Lamarcus Antonio Slydell v. State of Florida, 240 So. 3d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, 626 So. 2d 185, 186 (Fla. 1993); see also § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2016); United States v. Place
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedRivera v. State of Florida (2024)
phrase: "accord"
Copy

·Perry v. State, 296 So. 2d 505 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

denial thereof was reversible error. Fla. Stat. § 901.151, F.S.A. requires circumstances reasonably indicating
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLouis v. State (1991)
Copy

·Poole v. State, 639 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 WL 248257

necessary for a Terry stop or a stop pursuant to section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1989), does not arise
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedEstevez v. State (2005)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·In Interest of GT, 387 So. 2d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16970

arrival at the scene. The result here hinges on Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979), our "Stop and Frisk
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Lawson (1984)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Matthew A. Tobin v. State of Florida, 146 So. 3d 159 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2012), Terry v. Ohio,
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedState of Florida v. L. C. (2024)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityJerry Weakley v. State of Florida (2019)
Cited (see also)James Justin Channell v. State of Florida (2018)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Newkirk v. State, 964 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2713556

State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993); see also § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2005). To be valid, an investigatory
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
CitedMusallam v. State (2014)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Seymour (2011)
Cited as authorityRobinson v. State (2008)
Copy

·Slaughter v. State, 830 So. 2d 955 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2002 WL 31641416

Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2000). Thus, the appellant's initial
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityVarela v. Bernachea (2005)
CitedCamaroto v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Reyes, 4 So. 3d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1258, 2009 WL 383589

pat-down search exceeded the scope authorized by section 901.151 of the Florida Statutes and that the evidence
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPrice v. State (2013)
Copy

·Rhoden v. State, 941 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 12842, 2006 WL 2135873

committing, or was about to commit a crime. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2003); Williams v. State, 910 So
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)CARTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2024)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityR.R. v. State (2014)
Cited as authorityState v. Champers (2013)
Copy

·Fraley v. State, 374 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

of appellant pursuant to the provisions of Section 901.151 Florida Statutes (1977). After patting down
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Brezial v. State, 416 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Rather, under Section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1981), the officer must
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Kinzer v. State, 366 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

circumstances and in my view it would be "founded." Section 901.151, Florida Statute (1977) does not require probable
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·State of Florida v. Kerrick Van Teamer, 151 So. 3d 421 (Fla. 2014).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 478, 2014 WL 2979378, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2149, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10282

committing, or is about to commit a crime.” (citing § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991))). However, a “police officer
0 red0 yellow26 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityWilliams v. State of Florida (2025)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityCARTER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2024)
Copy

·Whyte v. State, 940 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 2787330

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla.Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a citizen's
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBREVICK v. State (2007)
Quote AuthorityK.Q.W. v. State (2007)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Williams v. State, 531 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1988 WL 96454

might be sufficient for a stop and frisk under section 901.151, Florida Statutes, such "pat-down" or "frisk"
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Austin v. State (1994)
phrase: "compare"
Cited (see also)Gillette v. State (1990)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Vaughn v. State, 176 So. 3d 354 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13617, 2015 WL 5306180

to remove the knife for safety concerns. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2014) (providing that when an
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. TONY DEVONNE HALL (2024)
Copy

·McNeil v. State, 995 So. 2d 525 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 2220838

State, 610 So.2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); see also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2006). Routine patdown searches based
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityDawson v. State (2011)
CitedRodriguez v. State (2009)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Hankerson v. State, 32 So. 3d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4209, 2010 WL 1222633

1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). [2] § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2009).
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Hankerson (2011)
Copy

·Hill v. State, 39 So. 3d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9560, 2010 WL 2595535

individual is engaged in criminal activity. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2006). See also Carroll v. State
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedW.G. v. State (2013)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Raettig v. State, 406 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

further detainment of appellant by relying on Section 901.151, Florida's stop and frisk statute. Although
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedJohnson v. State (1986)
phrase: "see"
CitedBrayton v. State (1982)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·McKnight v. State, 972 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 4561576

committing, or is about to commit a crime." Id.; § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). The third level is an "arrest
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedBlalock v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
CitedMajors v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Perez, 592 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 62906

investigative stop of the defendant under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987). The court granted
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

D.B.P. v. State, 31 So. 3d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3621

a threat to the officer or any other person. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2009). In J.L., however, the Florida
Copy

·AG v. State, 562 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 WL 73205

founded suspicion to support a stop under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987), but argued that there
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

D.G. v. State, 661 So. 2d 75 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6812

or to enter his home without a warrant. See § 901.151, .19, Fla. Stat. (1993). The police investigation
Copy

·Herring v. State, 393 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

recognized exceptions to warrantless searches. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979), gives an officer
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

D.O. v. State, 77 So. 3d 787 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20458

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. mon) . In recognizing these differences
Copy

E.J. v. State, 40 So. 3d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11284

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and section 901.151, Florida Statutes, permit an officer to detain
Copy

·State v. Angel, 547 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 WL 99699

activity and detention under the Stop and Frisk Law. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1987);[1]Tippins v. State, 454 So
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

P.B.P. v. State, 955 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 6364

grabbed P.B.P. and pulled him out of the house. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (2004), which governs
Copy

·State v. Arango, 9 So. 3d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3409, 2009 WL 1066137

should not have been suppressed. We agree. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes provides, in pertinent part:
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Santiago v. State, 84 So. 3d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 2 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5562, 2012 WL 1192129

articulable suspicion of criminal activity); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2009) (codifying the standards
Copy

·J.H. v. State, 106 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 616499, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2611

the detainee may be in possession of a weapon. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2010); see also United States
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Matthew A. Tobin v. State of Florida (2014)
phrase: "compare"
Copy

·Miami-Dade Police v. $28,176.00 US, 946 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2006 WL 3734273

facts, reasonably warrant this type of intrusion. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2005); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedBall v. City of Coral Gables (2008)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·CQ v. State, 801 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 WL 1589187

v. State, 574 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2000). Police may not lawfully
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedHatcher v. State (2003)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Skinner v. State, 31 So. 3d 940 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4523, 2010 WL 1378151

detainee—here, Mr. Skinner—committed the offense. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2007); State v. Taylor, 648 So
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Copy

·Stitely v. State, 368 So. 2d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14664

justify the search of his person pursuant to Section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1977), and Terry v. Ohio
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityA.J.M. v. State (1999)
Cited as authorityAJM v. State (1999)
Cited as authorityTP v. State (1991)
Copy

·Prestley v. State, 896 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2225, 2005 WL 433136

v. State, 592 So.2d 1082 (Fla.1992); see also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2003).
0 red0 yellow6 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityG.M., a Child v. State of Florida (2015)
CitedA.V. v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityJ.P. v. State (2011)
Copy

·Nealy v. State, 652 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2259, 1995 WL 92713

committing or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1991); Popple v. State, 626 So.2d
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySousa v. State (2016)
Cited as authorityLugo v. State (2004)
CitedBrown v. State (1996)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Woody v. State, 464 So. 2d 669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 606, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12629

2d 889 (1968), and *670our Florida Statute, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1983). As pointed out by
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityTP v. State (1991)
Cited as authorityT.P. v. State (1991)
Copy

·G.M., a Child v. State of Florida, 172 So. 3d 963 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11954, 2015 WL 4747407

searching them for the presence of a weapon) (quoting § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1995)). In Terry v. Ohio
0 red0 yellow4 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityT.T., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
Copy

·McClendon v. State, 440 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24066

therefore the stop was not authorized by Section 901.151, Florida Statutes.2 Although appellee’s brief
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Holland (1996)
CitedState v. Eldridge (1990)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Kehoe (1986)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Allen, 994 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 17280, 2008 WL 4889137

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2007). See also State v. Lopez
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityPrice v. State (2013)
CitedDixon v. State (2011)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityFrost v. State (2011)
Copy

·State v. Johnson, 414 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19997

activity. Thus, DiBello had grounds under section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1979), Florida’s “stop
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authority(citing case) (1990)
Cited as authorityUnited States v. McConnell (1990)
Copy

·State v. Triplett, 82 So. 3d 860 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8079, 2011 WL 2135541

Florida’s “Stop and Frisk Law,” codified in Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (2008), permits "a law enforcement
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Myers (2015)
Cited as authorityJonavon D. Gaines v. State (2015)
Cited as authorityCalder v. State (2014)
Copy

·Willis v. State, 584 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6556, 1991 WL 120779

Codie v. State, 406 So.2d 117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1989). In determining whether there
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySaturnino-Boudet v. State (1996)
Cited as authoritySaturnino-Boudet v. State (1996)
Cited as authorityBush v. State (1992)
Copy

·Marques Johnson v. James Dunn (11th Cir. 2024).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Jun 9, 2022

that statement by citing Florida Statute § 901.151(2) 11 and three U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWalker v. Morton (2025)
Cited (see also)KNIGHT v. COASTAL STATE PRISON (2025)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Cited as authorityStout v. Sheriff Harris (2024)
Copy

·Musallam v. State, 133 So. 3d 568 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 562901, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2028

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2012). The detention must be based
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State of Florida (2025)
CitedState v. Battle (2017)
phrase: "see"
CitedBrown v. State (2017)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Austin v. State, 640 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7995, 1994 WL 419615

Medina v. State, 466 So.2d 1046 (Fla.1985). . § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1991).
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Leach (2015)
Quote AuthorityChaney v. State (2007)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Neely, 560 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2339, 1990 WL 39895

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) and Section 901.151, Florida Statutes. See State v. Pye, 551 So
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Copy

·Cole v. State, 190 So. 3d 185 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2016 WL 1578469, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5971

State, 727 So.2d 204 (Fla.1998). Section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (2012). (entitled “Stop
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)MARQUESE D. GOODMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
phrase: "compare"
Cited as authorityState v. Pena (2018)
Cited as authorityState v. Maxwell (2018)
Copy

·Kell v. State, 559 So. 2d 731 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2606, 1990 WL 45281

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1987). Here, the stop was illegal
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Quote AuthorityJessup v. Miami-Dade County (2011)
CitedIn the Interest of J.L. (1993)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Smith v. State, 925 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5325, 2006 WL 931580

a threat to the officer or any other person. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. Our supreme court has indicated
0 red0 yellow3 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Cruse (2013)
CitedKS v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
CitedK.S. v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Franklin v. State, 750 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 WL 817835

him about the robbery. Id.; see also Fla. Stat. § 901.151(2) (1997). Accordingly, we affirm appellant's
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Williams v. State, 127 So. 3d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 6081873, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18419

State, 384 So.2d 272, 274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). Here, the mere fact that
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Berry v. State, 86 So. 3d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 1592165, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7185

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2009); Popple v. State, 626 So
Copy

Poviones v. State, 15 So. 3d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6231, 2009 WL 1456728

down of Poviones to see if he had a weapon. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2004); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
Copy

Gay v. State, 138 So. 3d 1106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 1909092, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7121

activity.’ ” Smith, 95 So.3d at 968 (quoting § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2010)). “An officer’s mere suspicion
Copy

Andrews v. State, 962 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2126275

authorized to perform an investigatory stop. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2005); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S
Copy

Blice v. State, 825 So. 2d 447 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10439, 2002 WL 1723790

crime of carrying a concealed firearm. See Terry; § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991);2 § 790.01, Fla. Stat. (2001);
Copy

T.T.N. v. State, 40 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10682

So.2d 1169, 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); see also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2005). There was no reasonable indication
Copy

D.N. v. State, 805 So. 2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 261

a founded suspicion of criminal activity. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2000)(Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law)
Copy

K.S. v. State, 85 So. 3d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Cited 1 times | Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 1317950, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6050

So.2d 1321, 1323 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (quoting § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1993)). However, a valid stop
Copy

M.A.H. v. State, 559 So. 2d 407 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2505

scope permitted under section 901.151, Fla.Stat.,” and we agree. Section 901.151 is the “Florida Stop
Copy

·Lewis v. State, 625 So. 2d 84 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9619, 1993 WL 382584

DOWNEY, JAMES C., Senior Judge, concur. . Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991) provides in pertinent
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Sanchez v. State (2016)
phrase: "compare"
CitedWalker v. State (1993)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Smith v. State, 389 So. 2d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17256

Law” itself, permits the seizure of a weapon. § 901.151(5), Fla.Stat. (1979). Therefore, the gun, unlike
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySchaeffler v. Deych (2010)
Cited (see also)London v. State (1989)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Diaz v. State, 548 So. 2d 842 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5007, 1989 WL 104041

1987), review denied, 520 So.2d 585 (Fla.1988); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1987). .
Copy

·Judah v. State, 654 So. 2d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4991, 1995 WL 264015

without merit and warrant no further discussion. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (“stop and frisk” law); Terry v. Ohio
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityLeveritt v. State (2002)
CitedPeople v. Evans (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Tague v. Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Comm'n, 390 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (M.D. Fla. 2005).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28261, 2005 WL 1243766

S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Fla. Stat. § 901.151 (2005)). The Eleventh Circuit has held that "a
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedCox v. Bank of America Corporation (2021)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·McCloud v. State, 787 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6998, 2001 WL 523555

sufficient to detain the two men pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1997). But this suspicion
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedBrown v. State (2017)
phrase: "see"
CitedHughes v. State (2014)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Mitchell v. State, 522 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 828, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1183, 1988 WL 25454

they were not weapons. Michigan v. Long, Florida Statute 901.-151(5), Dunn v. State, 382 So.2d 727 (Fla
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedBrewer v. State (1990)
phrase: "see"
CitedState v. Ruiz (1988)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Stanford v. State, 415 So. 2d 879 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20410

to conduct a “stop and frisk” pursuant to Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979), extends only to a
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Ago (1993)
phrase: "compare"
CitedAgo (1986)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Blackburn v. State, 414 So. 2d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20170

appellant was constitutionally permissible under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981), the “stop and frisk
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityShaver v. State (1998)
Copy

·Blake Edwin Tripp v. State of Florida, 251 So. 3d 982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

surrounding the suspected criminal activity. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. An investigatory stop requires
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Copy

·Lee v. State, 392 So. 2d 615 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18672

to the extent necessary to disclose a weapon. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1979); Schnick v. State, 362 So.2d
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedPayne v. State (1995)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)State v. Williams (1985)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·State v. Bowen, 444 So. 2d 1009 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11366

indicated that such person was committing a felony. § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1981). Although defendants had
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedAER v. State (1985)
phrase: "see"
CitedA.E.R. v. State (1985)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Simon v. State, 424 So. 2d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18726

governed by Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981). In other words, “founded
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Fernandez (1987)
phrase: "see"
Cited as authorityState v. Restrepo-Montoya (1987)
Copy

·Cuva v. State, 687 So. 2d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 99, 1997 WL 7125

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1993). The officer testified that
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedTOJARRE J. NELSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2019)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)C.D. v. State (2011)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Daniels v. State, 409 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19223

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1979). Therefore, the probationary
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)CLAUDE COFFY v. MONIQUE COFFY (2021)
phrase: "see also"
Cited as authorityDaizi v. Daizi (1989)
Copy

·Phillips v. State, 536 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 67, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5750, 1988 WL 139517

of the car. The Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151 Florida Statutes (1987), specifically grants
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedL.D.P. v. State (1989)
phrase: "see"
CitedLDP v. State (1989)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Johnson v. State, 640 So. 2d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7751, 1994 WL 406147

State, 556 So.2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). . § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1993); State v. Anderson, 591 So.2d
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedThornton v. State (2012)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Ippolito v. State (2001)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·KS v. State, 85 So. 3d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 1317950

So.2d 1321, 1323 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (quoting § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1993)). However, a valid stop
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Arevalo (2013)
Copy

·CB v. State, 979 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 1756597

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a citizen's
0 red0 yellow2 green0 procedural
CitedPavao v. Hershone (2021)
phrase: "see"
Cited (see also)Johnson v. State (2008)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·J.K.H. v. State, 659 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9425, 1995 WL 527200

temporarily detain the defendant pursuant to section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1993), and to subsequently
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedEverette v. State (1999)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·J.B. v. State, 679 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10510, 1996 WL 546307

individual is involved in criminal activity. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1993); Walker v. State, 514 So.2d
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityBrown v. State (2017)
Copy

·State v. Cook, 475 So. 2d 285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2112, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15791

and so we look to the validity of that stop. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1983), says in pertinent
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Hannah (2012)
Copy

·State v. Abraham, 625 So. 2d 986 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10924, 1993 WL 431995

committing, or was about to commit a criminal offense. § 901.-151(2), Florida Statutes (1991). We hold that under
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedState v. Mitchell (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·McKinney v. Wainwright, 458 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2245, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15616

firearm should have been suppressed pursuant to Section 901.151(6), Florida Statutes (1981). However, even
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedCogbill v. State (2006)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Wilkerson v. State, 376 So. 2d 63 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15964

1979). Moreover Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law, Section 901.151(5), Fla.Stat (1977), complies with Terry by
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedJohnson v. State (1988)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Fleming, 663 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11745, 1995 WL 656456

timely appealed this suppression. We reverse. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1993), the Florida Stop
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedState v. W.E. (2002)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Williams, 627 So. 2d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11792, 1993 WL 482343

or was about to commit a criminal offense. Section 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1991). We hold that, under the
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityFreeman v. State (2005)
Copy

·Louis v. State, 589 So. 2d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11396, 1991 WL 240122

was a suspect in a robbery investigation. See § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1989). The officers’ information creating
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedC.E.P. v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. F.T.H., 579 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4832, 1991 WL 87965

equivalent to arrest. Compare § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1989) with § 901.151(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). See also
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedR.F. v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Warshan, 580 So. 2d 317 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1442

to make an investigatory stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989). Based on the officer's
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedSiders v. State (1996)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Lencsak v. State, 579 So. 2d 882 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4766, 1991 WL 85541

person detained is armed with a dangerous weapon. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. This case is similar to J.R.H. v. State
0 red1 yellow0 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Jenkins v. State (1996)
phrase: "but see"
Copy

·State v. Grant, 845 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 7497, 2003 WL 21180144

suspicion that defendant was committing a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2001); C.A.M. v. State, 819 So.2d
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authoritySTATE OF FLORIDA v. T.M., A CHILD (2018)
Copy

·State v. Pryor, 427 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19236

stop under the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981).1 The transcript of
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)McKee v. State (1983)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·Williams v. State, 428 So. 2d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18980

the present case satisfy the requirements of Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981) and Terry v. Ohio
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Gay (1990)
Copy

·Robinson v. State, 615 So. 2d 201 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2482, 1993 WL 63482

investigative stop and pat-down for weapons. See § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1991). For present purposes we assume
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedDempsey v. State (1998)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Marsh, 576 So. 2d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2215, 1991 WL 35025

insufficient to justify a stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987). The motion further
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedJ.C. v. State (1993)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Saums, 633 So. 2d 538 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1979, 1994 WL 72146

determination of the validity of the stop. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991), authorizes a temporary
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedFord v. State (2001)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Jerry Weakley v. State of Florida, 273 So. 3d 283 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

a stop.” Popple, 626 So. 2d at 186; see also § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1991). To justify an investigative
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedBonett v. Gualtieri (2022)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Wallace v. State, 964 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11510, 2007 WL 2141807

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a citizen’s
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedState v. T.S. (2013)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·State v. Woodard, 582 So. 2d 1249 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7048, 1991 WL 134414

concluded that they had stolen the ladders. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1989), in pertinent part
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Moskowitz v. State (1998)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·TTN v. State, 40 So. 3d 897 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2010 WL 2867873

So.2d 1169, 1171 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); see also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2005). There was no reasonable indication
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityState v. Daniels (2014)
Copy

·Herrmann v. State, 728 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 734, 1999 WL 34776

activity before he can make a stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1997). “A hunch is not enough
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Rinehart v. State (2000)
phrase: "see also"
Copy

·McCant v. State, 501 So. 2d 182 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 418, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6523

v. State, 469 So.2d 826 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); § 901.-151(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). Further, the officer was
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)State v. Wise (1992)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·M.E.S. v. State, 804 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 137, 2002 WL 27266

transformed into an investigatory detention. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1999), authorizes an
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited (see also)Slaughter v. State (2002)
phrase: "see, e.g."
Copy

·Watts v. State, 468 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 491, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12548

has a “founded suspicion” of illegal activity. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1983); State v. W.O.R., 382 So.2d
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Copy

·Dilyerd v. State, 444 So. 2d 577 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11554

101 S.Ct. 2860, 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981). . Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981) provides: (1) This
0 red1 yellow0 green0 procedural
Cited "but see"Shaw v. State (1984)
phrase: "but cf."
Copy

·State v. Amerson, 392 So. 2d 311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17903

was justified. Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979), requires that a law
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedState v. De Jesus-Santibanez (1995)
phrase: "see"
Copy

·Horton v. State, 660 So. 2d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8900, 1995 WL 497028

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla.Stat. (1991).” Popple, 626 So.2d at 186. Deputy
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityForman v. State (2013)
Copy

·Rachel v. State, 987 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 3850872

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); see also § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2006). A citizen encounter becomes
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityWilliams v. State (2008)
Copy

·State v. Suggs, 765 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10319, 2000 WL 1152556

sufficient to justify an investigatory stop. § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. Russell, 659 So
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
Cited as authorityNapoleon v. State (2008)
Copy

·Chauncey v. State, 382 So. 2d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15890

illegal because the frisk was not authorized by Section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1977). We agree and reverse
0 red0 yellow1 green0 procedural
CitedJohnson v. State (1988)
phrase: "see"
Copy

M. A. P. v. State, 403 So. 2d 1384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21203

crime before he may lawfully detain such person. § 901.-151, Fla.Stat. (1979); State v. Stevens, 354 *1386So
Copy

·Sharpless v. State, 549 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2294, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5315, 1989 WL 112132

the meaning of Florida’s stop and frisk law. § 901.151; Fla.Stat. (1987); McLane v. Rose, 537 So.2d 652
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Weaver v. State, 548 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2253, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5303, 1989 WL 109985

authorized under the “Florida Stop and Frisk Law,” section 901.-151, Florida Statutes (1987). See also, Terry
Copy

E.A.B. v. State, 964 So. 2d 877 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15159

whether Morales was authorized, pursuant to section 901.151,2 to stop E.A.B. upon the latter’s exit from
Copy

·E.F. v. State, 795 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13424, 2001 WL 1130830

to suppress unlawfully obtained evidence.1 See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2001); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Johnson v. State, 567 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7191, 1990 WL 136854

determine whether any arrests led to a conviction. Section 901.151, F.S. (1987), Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·In the Interest of J.L., 623 So. 2d 860 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9171, 1993 WL 349890

alleged an illegal stop and search pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991), and the Fourth Amendment
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Frazer v. State, 362 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16343

weapons. Under our “stop and frisk” law, Florida Statute 901.151(2) (1977), it is provided that Whenever
Copy

Johnson v. State, 989 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13850, 2008 WL 4146800

be supported by a “reasonable suspicion.” See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2007); see also Gray v. State
Copy

Saturnino-Boudet v. State, 682 So. 2d 188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10399

(Fla.1992); Simons, 549 So.2d at 787; see also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995). This temporary detention is
Copy

Blake v. State, 939 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16606

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a
Copy

Blair v. State, 302 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8451

defendant’s motion to suppress. Cf. Fla.Stat. § 901.151, 23 F.S.A. Affirmed.
Copy

Jason Hassan Baxter Vs State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Allen, 994 So. 2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2021). “Therefore, ‘an investigatory
Copy

·Hamilton v. State, 552 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2507, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5989, 1989 WL 125984

permissible under the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987) which provides in
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Downs v. State, 439 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22724

reasonable grounds to stop Downs’ car pursuant to Section 901.-151, Florida Statutes (1981). It does not matter
Copy

Walker v. State, 625 So. 2d 943 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10633, 1993 WL 416032

is committing or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1991); Cooper v. State, 584 So.2d
Copy

Marques A. Johnson v. James Dunn (11th Cir. 2023).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Jun 9, 2022

that statement by citing Florida Statute § 901.151(2) 11 and three U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Copy

State v. Hannah, 98 So. 3d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2012 WL 4490869, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16492

motion to suppress, explaining that pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes, and this court’s decision
Copy

Key v. State, 587 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10344, 1991 WL 209286

a founded suspicion to justify a Terry stop. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1987). On the evening of February
Copy

Harrison v. State, 549 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2451, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5804, 1989 WL 120865

Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244, 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1987). Affirmed.
Copy

·J.D. v. State, 568 So. 2d 99 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7903, 1990 WL 154797

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Pla.Stat. (1989). Such circumstances, however
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Vasquez v. State, 376 So. 2d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 21071

State, *271264 So.2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); § 901.-151, Fla.Stat. (1977).
Copy

·In re the Forfeiture of 1984 Toyota Pick-Up Truck, 501 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2190, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10109

officer’s right to make a stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes: There will be borderline
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Fant v. State, 72 So. 3d 784 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16182, 2011 WL 5108460

disclose the weapon.”) (citation omitted); also cf. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2010) (‘Whenever any law enforcement
Copy

Nicol v. State, 939 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17011, 2006 WL 2918751

See Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185 (Fla.1993); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2001); see also Terry v. Ohio, 392
Copy

State v. Campbell, 438 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22485

47, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981). Nor did Campbell’s
Copy

State of Florida v. Evelyn Barone (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

(1968), and Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (2022). See also Johnson
Copy

L.D.P. v. State, 551 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2594, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6368

stop and detain an individual pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes, only where he has a founded
Copy

Q.E.G. v. State, 569 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8609

Hughes, 562 So.2d 795, 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1989). A bare suspicion of illegal
Copy

State, Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Vehs. v. Guthrie, 662 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11577, 1995 WL 642676

i.e., DUI. The officer was entitled under section 901.151 to conduct reasonable inquiry to confirm or
Copy

Richard Scott v. State, 150 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19363, 2014 WL 6674777

or is about to commit a [criminal] violation.” § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). When considering whether
Copy

Papalas v. State, 645 So. 2d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11506, 1994 WL 652848

beyond the scope of a valid frisk pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes. We hold that the trial court
Copy

B.T. v. State, 702 So. 2d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13136

justify a pat-down under section 901.151, Florida Statutes. Section 901.151, also known as the “Florida
Copy

State v. Martinez, 376 So. 2d 931 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15826

(1968), and the Florida Stop and Frisk Law. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977). We conclude that
Copy

Terri Allenbrand v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

626 So. 2d 185, 186 (Fla. 1993)); see also § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2016). To avoid a violation of
Copy

State v. Maxwell, 245 So. 3d 994 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

State, 124 So. 3d 176, 183 (Fla. 2013); see also § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2017) (the “Florida Stop and Frisk
Copy

A.H. v. State, 693 So. 2d 89 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4912

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla.Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a citizen’s
Copy

Bassing v. State, 397 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19770

to terminate defendant’s detention, citing section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979). (1) This section
Copy

Lawton v. State, 449 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13012

101 S.Ct. 2587 (1981), and Florida Statutes § 901.151 (1983). BOOTH, SHIVERS and JOANOS, JJ., concur
Copy

Cree v. State, 619 So. 2d 398 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5873, 1993 WL 179470

suspicion that a crime was being committed. See § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1991). The officer never articulated
Copy

·Butler v. State, 579 So. 2d 890 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 WL 87233

stop under Florida's Stop and Frisk Law. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1989). The officers halted their
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Sessoms v. State, 400 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28067

Kelly v. State, 389 So.2d 250 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1979); compare Wesley v. State, 375
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·State v. K.S., 694 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5619, 1997 WL 270615

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995) (Florida's Stop and Frisk Law)
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Webb v. State, 384 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16204

basis for a reasonable suspicion pursuant to Section 901.151 Florida Statutes (1977). The evidence adduced
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

State v. A.L., 956 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 7574

State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993) (citing § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991)). We believe the circuit court’s
Copy

·State v. AL, 956 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 1452276

State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993) (citing § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991)). We believe the circuit court's
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Turner v. State, 579 So. 2d 854 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4573, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1336

concerning open liquor containers in public. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1989). The officers did not, however
Copy

Woodson v. State, 579 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4558

committing or were about to commit a criminal offense. § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). See Curry v. State, 570
Copy

·McKinnon v. State, 617 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5363, 1993 WL 152371

appellants’ motions to suppress physical evidence. Section 901.151, Fla.Stat., Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law, provides
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Crew v. State, 738 So. 2d 352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5982, 1999 WL 595324

criminal law at the time he was stopped. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
Copy

McKnight v. State, 464 So. 2d 244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12752

1973), cert. denied, 291 So.2d 205 (Fla.1974); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1981).
Copy

J.R.H. v. State, 428 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18964

the scope of the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981). That section authorizes
Copy

State v. Lopez, 29 So. 3d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2532, 2010 WL 711735

State v. Arango, 9 So.3d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2007) ("Whenever any law enforcement
Copy

Hofmeister v. State, 381 So. 2d 352 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15823

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) and Section 901.151, Florida Statutes; and to justify the subsequent
Copy

Pedro Jose Domingues v. State, 159 So. 3d 1019 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 4266, 2015 WL 1334085

suspicion to support a stop is also codified in section 901.151, Florida Statutes (2013), Florida’s Stop and
Copy

State v. Aqqad, 637 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3073, 1994 WL 98830

order to justify a temporary detention under section 901.151, the detaining officer must have a founded
Copy

Jenkins v. State, 730 So. 2d 776 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3407, 1999 WL 155710

the federal and state constitutions and by section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1995). Accordingly, we reverse
Copy

·Donaldson v. State, 309 So. 2d 592 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14429

seizure of the weapon were properly made, under § 901.151(2) and (5) Fla.Stat., F.S. A. The court correctly
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

State v. Marcinowski, 371 So. 2d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14285

notwithstanding that the Florida Stop and Frisk Law, Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977), indicates that the
Copy

G.A.M. v. State, 780 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 3219

1992). Under Florida’s “Stop and Frisk Law,” section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1997), law enforcement officers
Copy

J.A.R. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2407

an inquiry in the nature of a Terry2 stop. See § 901.151(2), (5), Fla. Stat. (1993). See also T.J., 538
Copy

M.M. v. State, 728 So. 2d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2619, 1999 WL 128881

justify an investigatory stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1997). See Popple v. State
Copy

Rogers v. State, 580 So. 2d 627 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1746, 1991 WL 25355

well-founded suspicion to detain appellant under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989). See Curry v. State
Copy

Holl v. United Parcel Serv., 140 So. 3d 1062 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8789, 2014 WL 2565921

give due weight and effect to the title of section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977), which was placed
Copy

Barbes v. State, 414 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29008

v. State, 378 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1979).
Copy

Watson v. State, 562 So. 2d 415 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4138, 1990 WL 77404

made in conformance with the requirements of section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989), e.g., Mosley v. State
Copy

A.G. v. State, 562 So. 2d 400 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4054

founded suspicion to support a stop under section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987), but argued that there
Copy

L.D. v. State, 770 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8034, 2000 WL 827009

the safety of others, was in danger. See id.; § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1997). The state asserts that
Copy

Graham v. State, 685 So. 2d 1354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6823, 1996 WL 354388

poses a threat to the officer or another person. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1993); State v. Webb, 398 So.2d
Copy

Estevez v. State, 915 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9736, 2005 WL 1467329

. While this court in Stalling, following section 901.151, Florida Statutes, employs the term "probable
Copy

State v. E.D.R., 959 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618

Further, the seizure was not pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (2005), Florida’s Stop and
Copy

·Randall v. State, 600 So. 2d 553 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6959, 1992 WL 134750

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1989); State v. Simons, 549 So
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Robert Rachon Brooks Vs State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

statute is admissible in any Florida court. See § 901.151(6), Fla. Stat. Such is also true of the statutes
Copy

D.L.J. v. State, 932 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9773

seizure of the magazine and the gun violated section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (2004), and the constitutions
Copy

Manuel v. State, 932 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 9421, 2006 WL 1627455

Abraham v. State, 532 So.2d 91 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); § 901.151, Fla. Stat (“Florida Stop and Frisk Law”)(2000)
Copy

Poole v. State, 639 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5653

necessary for a Terry stop or a stop pursuant to section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1989), does not arise
Copy

·State v. Worthington, 543 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1341, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3007, 1989 WL 56312

permissible under Florida’s “stop and frisk” law, § 901.151, Florida Statutes (1987). The Florida Supreme
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Murtha v. State, 547 So. 2d 205 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1628, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3772, 1989 WL 73155

v. State, 384 So.2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1987). Even if the defendant’s appearance
Copy

R.R. v. State, 715 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9721

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). See also § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1997). Once the officer determined
Copy

Maxwell v. State, 170 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11338, 2015 WL 4546971

defendant for further investigation. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2010) (“When *919
Copy

J.M.C. v. State, 962 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a
Copy

Brown v. State, 315 So. 2d 534 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14293

probable cause to stop, detain and question Brown. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. After positive identification there
Copy

Fortney v. State, 510 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1617, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9124

exercise of Florida's Stop and Frisk Law, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1985). We disagree since
Copy

Ferrell v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ellis took the pocketknife from Mr. Ferrell. Cf. § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2023) (providing that an officer
Copy

L.K.B. v. State, 697 So. 2d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8223

1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995). The officer in this case had
Copy

·Shumaker v. State, 360 So. 2d 810 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16275

1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1977). Contrast Whitley
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Cotellis v. State, 297 So. 2d 625 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6875

appellant for weapons — but only for weapons. See Section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes. When he felt the key
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Stinson v. State, 117 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 3717535, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11224

State, 384 So.2d 272, 273-74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). A founded suspicion must
Copy

J. W. v. State, 281 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7600

CURIAM. Affirmed upon authority of Fla.Stat. § 901.151(2), F.S.A. See Wilson v. Porter, 361 F.2d 412
Copy

L.S. v. State, 697 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8189, 1997 WL 394866

facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.”); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). The trial court’s remarks
Copy

Christian Cruz v. State of Florida (Fla. 2021).

Published | Supreme Court of Florida

committing, or is about to commit a crime. See § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2019); see also Terry v. Ohio
Copy

M.J. v. State, 462 So. 2d 88 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11894

Reversed and remanded on the authority of section 901.151(5), Florida Statutes (1983). ANSTEAD, C.J.
Copy

Brewer v. State, 553 So. 2d 1382 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 21, 1990 WL 114

granted pursuant to Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1983). I cannot say exactly when the
Copy

·Colomo v. State, 687 So. 2d 880 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 248, 1997 WL 24313

also State v. Webb, 398 So.2d 820 (Fla.1981); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1993). While conducting the pat-down
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Nicholo v. State, 379 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15471

conducted within the permitted boundaries of Section 901.151, Florida Statutes, known as the “Stop and Frisk
Copy

A.E.R. v. State, 464 So. 2d 152 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 212, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11935

complaint, they were authorized, pursuant to section 901.-151(2), Florida Statutes (1983),1 to pursue the
Copy

Sprinkle v. State, 409 So. 2d 1082 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18951

application of the “stop and frisk law,” (now section 901.151, Florida Statutes [1979]), but on Fourth Amendment
Copy

·C. F. v. State, 394 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18825

Lewis v. State, 337 So.2d 1031 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); § 901.-151(2), Fla.Stat. (1979). Such a suspicion is one
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

C.N.H. v. State, 927 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1996, 2006 WL 357889

seizure was not performed in compliance with section 901.151, because school personnel had no reasonable
Copy

Laster v. State, 354 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15234

officer in stopping and frisking him pursuant to Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1975). Of course, there
Copy

State v. Ballinger, 977 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 1867, 2008 WL 373631

committing, or was about to commit a crime. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (2004); Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1
Copy

·State v. Jacobs, 574 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 1013, 1991 WL 15576

City of Miami, Fla., Code § 37-17(II) (1989). Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1989), authorizes the
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

·Berry v. State, 973 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal | 2008 WL 351047

to perform an investigatory stop. We agree. Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (2006), provides as follows:
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Brown v. State, 518 So. 2d 323 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2809, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11573, 1987 WL 2636

constituted an illegal stop in violation of section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1981), Florida’s Stop
Copy

State v. Lewis, 570 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9180, 1990 WL 195833

observations were sufficient to support the stop.1 Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989), provides: (2) Whenever
Copy

E.H. v. State, 593 So. 2d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12750

itself was improper. The state’s reliance on section 901.151 is misplaced. First, this was not a Terry stop
Copy

A.J.M. v. State, 746 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17036

concerned for his, and his partner’s, safety. See § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1997); Terry, 392 U.S. at 21-27
Copy

Harrison v. State, 442 So. 2d 427 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25278

the stop. Florida’s “Stop and Frisk Law,” section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1981), says in part:
Copy

In the Interest of R.E. v. State, 536 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5797

or were about to commit a crime as required by § 901.151, Fla.Stat., and Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88
Copy

Ashton v. State, 516 So. 2d 55 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2761, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11313, 1987 WL 2115

U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1985).
Copy

L. T. S. v. State, 391 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18262

state” sufficient to justify a stop under Section 901.151(2), Florida Statutes (1979), Florida’s Stop
Copy

·Lattimore v. State, 323 So. 2d 5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18865

ruling of the trial court was not error. See: § 901.151(5), Fla.Stat, F.S.A. The officer’s question was
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Ewing v. State, 480 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16958

to commit a crime in order to justify a stop. § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1983). “A ‘founded suspicion’ is
Copy

Miracle Letizia Atwell v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal

31 So. 3d 940, 943 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citing § 901.151(4), Fla. Stat. (2007), and Popple v. State, 626
Copy

State v. Harris, 230 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal

State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla. 1993) (citing § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991)). An investigatory stop requires
Copy

C.Q. v. State, 801 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17632

v. State, 574 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (2000). Police may not lawfully
Copy

State v. Jackson, 553 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2897, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6965, 1989 WL 150076

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Pla.Stat. (1981). See also Terry v. Ohio, 392
Copy

Marks v. State, 270 So. 2d 46 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5722

1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889; Fla. Stat. § 901.151, F.S.A. (1971). HOBSON, A. C. J., and MANN and
Copy

Augustus v. State, 773 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15488, 2000 WL 1760152

88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) and section 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (1997). See Hines v. State,
Copy

T.P. v. State, 585 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8188

GRIFFIN, Judge, dissenting. Subsection 5 of section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1989) provides: (5) Whenever
Copy

Clinton v. State, 388 So. 2d 251 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16966

committing, or is about to commit” a crime. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1979). See State v. Stevens
Copy

Melton v. State, 698 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9306, 1997 WL 464783

basis of Terry. See Florida’s Stop and Frisk Law, § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995). Rather, the officers appear
Copy

D.B.A. v. State, 962 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12369

him. We agree. The Florida Stop and Frisk Law, § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (Fla.2006), authorizes a limited
Copy

·DBA v. State, 962 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2007 WL 2275183

him. We agree. The Florida Stop and Frisk Law, § 901.151(5), Fla. Stat. (Fla.2006), authorizes a limited
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

R.S. v. State, 710 So. 2d 640 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3746, 1998 WL 166229

the appellant does not contend otherwise. See § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1995). But the factors which prompted
Copy

Reza v. State, 163 So. 3d 572 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5034

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (2014); Gray v. State, 981 So.2d 562
Copy

Butterworth v. State, 522 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 13 Fla. L. Weekly 881, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1316, 1988 WL 28284

Carter v. State, 454 So.2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1985). Therefore the court erred
Copy

Raulerson v. State of Florida (Fla. 1st DCA 2025).

Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal

a warrantless search incident to arrest); cf. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (specifying when a law enforcement
Copy

State v. Cross, 331 So. 2d 320 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14143

believe defendant was committing a crime, Fla.Stat. § 901.151 (1975); Thomas v. State, 250 So.2d 15 (Fla.App
Copy

Pamphile v. State, 110 So. 3d 517 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

Published | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1316372, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5342

Popple v. State, 626 So.2d 185, 186 (Fla.1993); § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). “Whether an officer has
Copy

Goelet v. State, 670 So. 2d 1168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3322, 1996 WL 148171

We affirm the ruling of the trial court. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1991), customarily and statutorily
Copy

·State v. Gonzalez, 562 So. 2d 705 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 2233, 1990 WL 37426

in which weapons might be held. Id.; see also § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1987). The search conducted by the
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

Lu Jing v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

authority to conduct a Terry stop pursuant to section 901.151, Florida Statutes (2006), to investigate the
Copy

G.J.P. v. State, 469 So. 2d 826 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1075, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13672

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla.Stat. (1983). Although the detention may
Copy

G.M. v. State, 981 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5879

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151, Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a
Copy

In re Spring Term (1977), Pinellas Cnty. Grand Jury, 357 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15444

that the money was seized in violation of Section 901.151, Florida Statutes, the Florida Stop and Frisk
Copy

C.B. v. State, 979 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

Published | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 5737

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151 Fla. Stat. (1991). In order not to violate a citizen’s
Copy

·J.E. v. State, 731 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4890, 1999 WL 218450

State, 685 So.2d 942, 943 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat.; State v. Webb, 398 So.2d 820,
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural
Copy

J.C.W. v. State, 545 So. 2d 306 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 943, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1983

albeit a temporary one — of a person. See section 901.151, Florida Statutes; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S.
Copy

James W. Johns v. State of Florida (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida

ordinances of any municipality or county." § 901.151(2), Fla. Stat. (2012); see also Terry v. Ohio
Copy

In the Interest of R.B. v. State, 429 So. 2d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19081

committing, or is about to commit a crime. Section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1981); Kearse v. State,
Copy

R.L.L. v. State, 466 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 951, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13415

appellant under the Stop and Frisk Statute, section 901.151, Florida Statutes (1983). We disagree with
Copy

·State v. Rizzo, 396 So. 2d 842 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19196

is committing, or is about to commit a crime. § 901.151(2), Fla.Stat. (1979); C. F. v. State, 394 So.2d
0 red0 yellow0 green0 procedural

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham Syfert, a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney (Florida Bar No. 39104). For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.