Florida Statute 905.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 905
GRAND JURY

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 905.04

905.04 Grounds for challenge to individual prospective grand juror.—

(1) The state or a person who has been held to answer may challenge an individual prospective grand juror on the ground that the juror:

(a) Does not have the qualifications required by law;

(b) Has a state of mind that will prevent him or her from acting impartially and without prejudice to the substantial rights of the party challenging;

(c) Is related by blood or marriage within the third degree to the defendant, to the person alleged to be injured by the offense charged, or to the person on whose complaint the prosecution was instituted.

(2) The state may challenge an individual prospective grand juror on the ground that the prospective juror is surety on the bail undertaking of any person whose case will come before the grand jury.

History.—s. 83, ch. 19554, 1939; CGL 1940 Supp. 8663(83); s. 43, ch. 70-339; s. 1490, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 905.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 905.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 905.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 905.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 905.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 905.04

Total Results: 13

Gallinat v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2006-11-16T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 941 So. 2d 1237

Snippet: regarding this issue is found at 26 A.L.R. 4th 905. [4] In many Florida jurisdictions time served is

Gilman+ Ciocia, Inc. v. Wetherald

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-09-22T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 885 So. 2d 900

Snippet: the National Association of Securities Dealers. *905 4. Under the terms of the agreement, Wetherald and

State v. Famiglietti

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2002-05-08T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 817 So. 2d 901

Snippet: 149 Vt.623, 548 A.2d 408 (1988)); WIS. STAT. § 905.04 (2001) (State v. Agacki, 226 Wis.2d 349, 595 N.

Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-10-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 795 So. 2d 863, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 866, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2275, 2000 WL 1508551

Snippet: 4.144, 4.310, and 4.370 and forms 4.902, 4.904, 4.905, 4.906, 4.907, 4.908, 4.9085, 4.909, 4.9091, 4.9092

Thompson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1990-06-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 565 So. 2d 1311

Snippet: challenge individual prospective grand jurors, section 905.04, Florida Statutes (1987), is the opportunity to

Porter v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1981-06-04T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 400 So. 2d 5

Snippet: denying these motions. This is not so. Section 905.04(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), provides that a

Herman v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-03-24T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 396 So. 2d 222

Snippet: appellant seeks to raise is whether or not section 905.04(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), disqualified[3]…S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). [3] Section 905.04 provides in pertinent part: (1) The state or a

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1974-04-16T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: disqualified for or exempt from such service, see ss. 905.04, 40.07, and 40.08, F.S., should not militate against

Seay v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1973-10-31T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 286 So. 2d 532

Snippet: afforded them under Fla. Stat. §§ 905.02, 905.03 and 905.04, F.S.A.[5] They chose not to challenge the grand… Florida under Fla. Stat. §§ 905.02, 905.03 and 905.04, F.S.A. be made, either by the State or "a…Walla, 57 N.D. 726, 224 N.W. 211 (1928). [5] "905.04 Grounds for challenge to individual prospective

State v. Papy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-09-15T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 239 So. 2d 604, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5818

Snippet: they were impanelled and sworn, in violation of § 905.04, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Further, that there were unauthorized

Metz v. Smith

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1962-05-29T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 141 So. 2d 617, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3271

Snippet: Venetian Blind Co., E.D.N.Y.1939, 30 F.Supp. 903, 905 ; 4 Moore, Federal Practice (2d ed. 1950) par. 34.07

Mann v. Thompson

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1960-02-17T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 118 So. 2d 112

Snippet: .2d 362. [3] Horn v. Horn, Fla. 1954, 73 So.2d 905. [4] Florida East Const R.R. Co. v. State, 77 Fla.

Corella v. McCormick Shipping Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1958-03-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 101 So. 2d 903, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2751

Snippet: flag; (3) Allegiance or domicile of the injured ; *905(4) Allegiance of the defendant shipowner ; (5) Place