Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 908.104 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 908.104 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 908.104

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 908
FEDERAL IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 908.104
908.104 Cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
(1) A law enforcement agency shall use best efforts to support the enforcement of federal immigration law. This subsection applies to an official, representative, agent, or employee of the entity or agency only when he or she is acting within the scope of his or her official duties or within the scope of his or her employment.
(2) Except as otherwise expressly prohibited by federal law, a state entity, local governmental entity, or law enforcement agency, or an employee, an agent, or a representative of the entity or agency, may not prohibit or in any way restrict a law enforcement agency from taking any of the following actions with respect to information regarding a person’s immigration status:
(a) Sending the information to or requesting, receiving, or reviewing the information from a federal immigration agency for purposes of this chapter.
(b) Recording and maintaining the information for purposes of this chapter.
(c) Exchanging the information with a federal immigration agency or another state entity, local governmental entity, or law enforcement agency for purposes of this chapter.
(d) Using the information to comply with an immigration detainer.
(e) Using the information to confirm the identity of a person who is detained by a law enforcement agency.
(f) Sending the applicable information obtained pursuant to enforcement of s. 448.095 to a federal immigration agency.
(3)(a) For purposes of this subsection, the term “applicable criminal case” means a criminal case in which:
1. The judgment requires the defendant to be confined in a secure correctional facility; and
2. The judge:
a. Indicates in the record under s. 908.105 that the defendant is subject to an immigration detainer; or
b. Otherwise indicates in the record that the defendant is subject to a transfer into federal custody.
(b) In an applicable criminal case, when the judge sentences a defendant who is the subject of an immigration detainer to confinement, the judge shall issue an order requiring the secure correctional facility in which the defendant is to be confined to reduce the defendant’s sentence by a period of not more than 12 days on the facility’s determination that the reduction in sentence will facilitate the seamless transfer of the defendant into federal custody. For purposes of this paragraph, the term “secure correctional facility” means a state correctional institution as defined in s. 944.02 or a county detention facility or a municipal detention facility as defined in s. 951.23.
(c) If the information specified in sub-subparagraph (a)2.a. or sub-subparagraph (a)2.b. is not available at the time the sentence is pronounced in the case, but is received by a law enforcement agency afterwards, the law enforcement agency shall notify the judge who shall issue the order described by paragraph (b) as soon as the information becomes available.
(4) When a county correctional facility or the Department of Corrections receives verification from a federal immigration agency that a person subject to an immigration detainer is in the law enforcement agency’s custody, the agency may securely transport the person to a federal facility in this state or to another point of transfer to federal custody outside the jurisdiction of the law enforcement agency. The law enforcement agency may transfer a person who is subject to an immigration detainer and is confined in a secure correctional facility to the custody of a federal immigration agency not earlier than 12 days before his or her release date. A law enforcement agency shall obtain judicial authorization before securely transporting an alien to a point of transfer outside of this state.
(5) This section does not require a state entity, local governmental entity, or law enforcement agency to provide a federal immigration agency with information related to a victim of or a witness to a criminal offense if the victim or witness timely and in good faith responds to the entity’s or agency’s request for information and cooperation in the investigation or prosecution of the offense.
(6) A state entity, local governmental entity, or law enforcement agency that, pursuant to subsection (5), withholds information regarding the immigration information of a victim of or witness to a criminal offense shall document the victim’s or witness’s cooperation in the entity’s or agency’s investigative records related to the offense and shall retain the records for at least 10 years for the purpose of audit, verification, or inspection by the Auditor General.
(7) This section does not authorize a law enforcement agency to detain an alien unlawfully present in the United States pursuant to an immigration detainer solely because the alien witnessed or reported a crime or was a victim of a criminal offense.
(8) This section does not apply to any alien unlawfully present in the United States if he or she is or has been a necessary witness or victim of a crime of domestic violence, rape, sexual exploitation, sexual assault, murder, manslaughter, assault, battery, human trafficking, kidnapping, false imprisonment, involuntary servitude, fraud in foreign labor contracting, blackmail, extortion, or witness tampering.
History.s. 1, ch. 2019-102; s. 12, ch. 2023-40.

F.S. 908.104 on Google Scholar

F.S. 908.104 on Casetext

Amendments to 908.104


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 908.104
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 908.104.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 908.104

Total Results: 7

State v. Brown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-05-12

Citation: 36 So. 3d 770, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 6547

Snippet: “[indiscriminate application” of the rule, Leon, supra, at 908, 104 S.Ct. 3405, and have held it to be applicable

State v. Brown

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-05-12

Citation: 36 So. 3d 770, 2010 WL 1875571

Snippet: "[i]ndiscriminate application" of the rule, Leon, supra, at 908, 104 S.Ct. 3405, and have held it to be applicable

Baptiste v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-18

Citation: 995 So. 2d 285, 2008 WL 4240489

Snippet: "[i]ndiscriminate application" of the rule, Leon, supra, at 908, 104 S.Ct. 3405, and have held it to be applicable

State v. Barnes

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-02-13

Citation: 979 So. 2d 991, 2008 WL 373098

Snippet: "[i]ndiscriminate application" of the rule, Leon, supra, at 908 [104 S.Ct. 3405], and have held it to be applicable

State v. Campbell

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-01-25

Citation: 948 So. 2d 725, 2007 WL 174358

Snippet: "[i]ndiscriminate application" of the rule, Leon, supra, at 908[, 104 S.Ct. 3405], and have held it to be applicable

State v. Williams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-07-01

Citation: 623 So. 2d 462, 1993 WL 241021

Snippet: 1460, 1477 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 908, 104 S.Ct. 264, 78 L.Ed.2d 247 (1983)). [4] The specific

Preston v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-10-29

Citation: 607 So. 2d 404, 1992 WL 311395

Snippet: violate double jeopardy), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 908, 104 S.Ct. 262, 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983). Contra State