Syfert Injury Law Firm

Keith Williams v. The State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-26T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: subpoenaed to appear at an evidentiary hearing. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“Subpoenas for witnesses

Ulloa v. CMI, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-11-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 133 So. 3d 914

Snippet: lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). The long-arm statute does… outside of *921the state. Pursuant to section 914.001(1), Florida Statutes (2010), a subpoena for a witness…this state run only throughout the state, see § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2010), the Fifth District properly…located out-of-state. Further, pursuant to section 914.001(1), the authority to issue subpoenas to nonparty

CMI, Inc. v. Ulloa

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-09-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 73 So. 3d 787

Snippet: lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). The long-arm statute does

Lloyds Underwriters at London v. Keystone Equipment Finance Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-12-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 25 So. 3d 89

Snippet: licensee is not licensed as an agent." § 626.914(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). [2] This circumstance is typically

Essex Ins. Co. v. Zota

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-06-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 985 So. 2d 1036

Snippet: with Essex Ins. at 13; see also §§ 626.913(2), 626.914(1) Fla. Stat. (2003) (defining "surplus lines

Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1996-11-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 685 So. 2d 1253

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes: In (3) the words "at the… (de) This provision does not appear in section 914.01, Florida Statutes, but it is a part of Federal

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-09-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 606 So. 2d 227

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes: In (3) the words "at the…. (d) This provision does not appear in section 914.01, Florida Statutes, but it is a part of Federal

Meek v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 474 So. 2d 340

Snippet: courtroom.2 It is the contemplation of Fla.Stat. § 914.01 and of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180 [predecessors to present

Smith v. Ford

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-06-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 472 So. 2d 1223

Snippet: 1 Bouv. Law Dict., Rawle's Third Rev., p. 914); one who lives in the family of another as a hired

Bolender v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1982-10-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 422 So. 2d 833

Snippet: its use has been superseded by statute. Section 914.001, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that witness

Stephan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1971-07-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 251 So. 2d 30

Snippet: provisions of F.S., Section 914.01(4), F.S.A., which reads as follows: “914.01 Presence of defendant when…interpretation should not be ascribed to Section 914.01(4). The decision in State v. Melendez, Fla.1971

Thompson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1971-04-06T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 246 So. 2d 760

Snippet: contrary to the laws of Florida, in particular Section 914.01, "In all prosecutions for a felony the defendant

State v. Melendez

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1971-02-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 244 So. 2d 137

Snippet: Court agreed and reversed, relying on Fla. Stat. § 914.01, F.S.A. *139 It is settled law that trial begins…continue as though he were present. Fla. Stat. § 914.01, F.S.A., which is repealed effective January 1,… 1.260. It is the contemplation of Fla. Stat. § 914.01 and of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180, and of case law, that where…contemplation of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180 or Fla. Stat. § 914.01, F.S.A. For the reasons stated herein, the decision

Henzel v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-05-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 235 So. 2d 358, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6410

Snippet: his trial in contravention of the provisions of § 914.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.” This court after a full review

Slinsky v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-03-05T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 232 So. 2d 451

Snippet: 33 F.S.A. The second statute, F.S. 1967, Section 914.01(4), F.S.A., provides that in a felony prosecution

Melendez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-02-03T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 231 So. 2d 251

Snippet: circumstances outlined above, were violative of § 914.01(3) FkuStat., F.S.A. (1967). See Holton v. State

Henzel v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-06-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 212 So. 2d 92

Snippet: his trial in contravention of the provisions of § 914.01, Fla.Stat, F.S.A. The trial of this cause was conducted…the commission of a felony is carried on. Section 914.01(4), Fla.Stat., supra; Cole v. State, Fla.App.1967

Cole v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1967-05-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 199 So. 2d 480

Snippet: finding of the trial judge. The requirement of § 914.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., that “In all prosecutions for

Adkins v. Smith

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1967-04-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 197 So. 2d 865, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5167

Snippet: presence of the defendant in violation of F.S.A. § 914.01 that constituted reversible error. The Florida …error unless it violates the provisions of F.S.A. § 914.01. Under the circumstances of this case the conversation

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1967-02-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 196 So. 2d 124

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of FS 914.01: In (3) the words "at the beginning of the…cases. (d) This provision does not appear in FS 914.01 but it is a part of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure