914.001

Witnesses; subpoenas to run throughout the state; all names to be included in one subpoena.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

914.001 Witnesses; subpoenas to run throughout the state; all names to be included in one subpoena.—

(1) Subpoenas for witnesses in criminal cases shall run throughout the state and be directed to all of the sheriffs of the state.

(2) When possible, the names of all witnesses summoned for, or at the cost of, the state in a criminal case shall be included in one subpoena, and the prosecuting officer shall, when possible, include the names of all such witnesses in one praecipe for such subpoena.

History.—s. 2, ch. 871, 1859; ss. 2, 4, 6, ch. 3702, 1887; RS 2859, 2860; GS 3915, 3916; RGS 6013, 6014; CGL 8307, 8308; s. 94, ch. 70-339.

Note.—Former s. 932.25.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1982–2015 · leading case: Bernard Bolender, A/K/A Bernard Bolander v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bernard Bolender, A/K/A Bernard Bolander v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (1994) ca11 “The court found the following relevant facts on direct appeal: Section 914.001, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that witness subpoenas in criminal cases shall run throughout the state, and section 48.”

Bolender v. State (1982) fla · cites it 2× “Section 914.001, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that witness subpoenas in criminal cases shall run throughout the state, and section 48.”

Ulloa v. CMI, Inc. (2013) fla · cites it 7× “Unlike personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation registered and doing business within the State of Florida, the subpoena power of a Florida court over a person or legal entity which is not a party in a lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines.”

CMI, Inc. v. Ulloa (2011) fladistctapp · cites it 2× “Unlike personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation registered and doing business within the State of Florida, the subpoena power of a Florida court over a person or legal entity which is not a party in a lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines.”

Yelp, Inc. v. Hadeed Carpet Cleaning (2015) va “at 920-21 (construing Fla. Stat. § 914.001 (1)). Similarly, Phillips Petroleum Co.”

— 914.001(1) — 2 cases

Ulloa v. CMI, Inc. (2013) fla “Unlike personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation registered and doing business within the State of Florida, the subpoena power of a Florida court over a person or legal entity which is not a party in a lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines.”

CMI, Inc. v. Ulloa (2011) fladistctapp “Unlike personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation registered and doing business within the State of Florida, the subpoena power of a Florida court over a person or legal entity which is not a party in a lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.