Syfert Injury Law Firm

Keith Williams v. The State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-26

Snippet: subpoenaed to appear at an evidentiary hearing. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“Subpoenas for witnesses

Ulloa v. CMI, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-07

Citation: 133 So. 3d 914, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 804, 2013 WL 5942299, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2420

Snippet: lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). The long-arm statute does

CMI, Inc. v. Ulloa

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-09-16

Citation: 73 So. 3d 787, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14664, 2011 WL 4102296

Snippet: lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). The long-arm statute does

Lloyds Underwriters at London v. Keystone Equipment Finance Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-12-23

Citation: 25 So. 3d 89, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20016, 2009 WL 4927917

Snippet: the licensee is not licensed as an agent." § 626.914(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). [2] This circumstance is typically

Essex Ins. Co. v. Zota

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-06-26

Citation: 985 So. 2d 1036, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 425, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 1112, 2008 WL 2520879

Snippet: with Essex Ins. at 13; see also §§ 626.913(2), 626.914(1) Fla. Stat. (2003) (defining "surplus lines agent

Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-11-27

Citation: 685 So. 2d 1253

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes: In (3) the words "at the beginning

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-09-24

Citation: 606 So. 2d 227, 1992 WL 246494

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes: In (3) the words "at the beginning

Meek v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-07-31

Citation: 474 So. 2d 340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14736

Snippet: courtroom.2 It is the contemplation of Fla.Stat. § 914.01 and of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180 [predecessors to present

Bolender v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1982-10-28

Citation: 422 So. 2d 833

Snippet: its use has been superseded by statute. Section 914.001, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that witness

Stephan v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-07-19

Citation: 251 So. 2d 30, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6108

Snippet: provisions of F.S., Section 914.01(4), F.S.A., which reads as follows: “914.01 Presence of defendant when

Thompson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-04-07

Citation: 246 So. 2d 760

Snippet: contrary to the laws of Florida, in particular Section 914.01, "In all prosecutions for a felony the defendant

State v. Melendez

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-02-03

Citation: 244 So. 2d 137

Snippet: Court agreed and reversed, relying on Fla. Stat. § 914.01, F.S.A. *139 It is settled law that trial begins

Henzel v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-05-12

Citation: 235 So. 2d 358, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6410

Snippet: his trial in contravention of the provisions of § 914.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.” This court after a full review

Slinsky v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-03-06

Citation: 232 So. 2d 451

Snippet: 33 F.S.A. The second statute, F.S. 1967, Section 914.01(4), F.S.A., provides that in a felony prosecution

Melendez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-02-03

Citation: 231 So. 2d 251, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910

Snippet: circumstances outlined above, were violative of § 914.01(3) FkuStat., F.S.A. (1967). See Holton v. State

Henzel v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1968-06-18

Citation: 212 So. 2d 92, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5269

Snippet: his trial in contravention of the provisions of § 914.01, Fla.Stat, F.S.A. The trial of this cause was conducted

Cole v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-05-31

Citation: 199 So. 2d 480, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4882

Snippet: finding of the trial judge. The requirement of § 914.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., that “In all prosecutions for

Adkins v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-04-06

Citation: 197 So. 2d 865, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5167

Snippet: presence of the defendant in violation of F.S.A. § 914.01 that constituted reversible error. The Florida

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1967-03-01

Citation: 196 So. 2d 124, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3956

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of FS 914.01: In (3) the words "at the beginning of the trial"

Reddick v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1966-10-05

Citation: 190 So. 2d 340

Snippet: 1966, 181 So.2d 698: "After an examination of § 914.01,[5] supra, and a review of decisions regarding