Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 914.001 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 914.001 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 914.001

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 914
WITNESSES; CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 914.001
914.001 Witnesses; subpoenas to run throughout the state; all names to be included in one subpoena.
(1) Subpoenas for witnesses in criminal cases shall run throughout the state and be directed to all of the sheriffs of the state.
(2) When possible, the names of all witnesses summoned for, or at the cost of, the state in a criminal case shall be included in one subpoena, and the prosecuting officer shall, when possible, include the names of all such witnesses in one praecipe for such subpoena.
History.s. 2, ch. 871, 1859; ss. 2, 4, 6, ch. 3702, 1887; RS 2859, 2860; GS 3915, 3916; RGS 6013, 6014; CGL 8307, 8308; s. 94, ch. 70-339.
Note.Former s. 932.25.

F.S. 914.001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 914.001 on Casetext

Amendments to 914.001


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 914.001
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 914.001.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

API Error: Request was throttled. Expected available in 1 second.

Cases Citing Statute 914.001

Total Results: 20

Keith Williams v. The State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-26T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: subpoenaed to appear at an evidentiary hearing. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2022) (“Subpoenas for witnesses

Ulloa v. CMI, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-11-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 133 So. 3d 914, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 804, 2013 WL 5942299, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2420

Snippet: lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). The long-arm statute does… outside of *921the state. Pursuant to section 914.001(1), Florida Statutes (2010), a subpoena for a witness…this state run only throughout the state, see § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2010), the Fifth District properly…located out-of-state. Further, pursuant to section 914.001(1), the authority to issue subpoenas to nonparty

CMI, Inc. v. Ulloa

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-09-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 73 So. 3d 787, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14664, 2011 WL 4102296

Snippet: lawsuit does not extend beyond state lines. See § 914.001(1), Fla. Stat. (2010). The long-arm statute does

Lloyds Underwriters at London v. Keystone Equipment Finance Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-12-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 25 So. 3d 89, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20016, 2009 WL 4927917

Snippet: licensee is not licensed as an agent." § 626.914(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). [2] This circumstance is typically

Essex Ins. Co. v. Zota

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2008-06-26T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 985 So. 2d 1036

Snippet: with Essex Ins. at 13; see also §§ 626.913(2), 626.914(1) Fla. Stat. (2003) (defining "surplus lines

Amends. to Fl. Rules of Crim. Proc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1996-11-26T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 685 So. 2d 1253

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes: In (3) the words "at the… (de) This provision does not appear in section 914.01, Florida Statutes, but it is a part of Federal

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-09-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 606 So. 2d 227

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of section 914.01, Florida Statutes: In (3) the words "at the…. (d) This provision does not appear in section 914.01, Florida Statutes, but it is a part of Federal

Meek v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-07-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 474 So. 2d 340, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 126, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14736

Snippet: courtroom.2 It is the contemplation of Fla.Stat. § 914.01 and of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180 [predecessors to present

Smith v. Ford

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-06-14T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 472 So. 2d 1223

Snippet: 1 Bouv. Law Dict., Rawle's Third Rev., p. 914); one who lives in the family of another as a hired

Bolender v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1982-10-28T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 422 So. 2d 833

Snippet: its use has been superseded by statute. Section 914.001, Florida Statutes (1979), provides that witness

Stephan v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1971-07-19T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 251 So. 2d 30, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6108

Snippet: provisions of F.S., Section 914.01(4), F.S.A., which reads as follows: “914.01 Presence of defendant when…interpretation should not be ascribed to Section 914.01(4). The decision in State v. Melendez, Fla.1971

Thompson v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1971-04-06T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 246 So. 2d 760

Snippet: contrary to the laws of Florida, in particular Section 914.01, "In all prosecutions for a felony the defendant

State v. Melendez

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1971-02-02T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 244 So. 2d 137

Snippet: Court agreed and reversed, relying on Fla. Stat. § 914.01, F.S.A. *139 It is settled law that trial begins…continue as though he were present. Fla. Stat. § 914.01, F.S.A., which is repealed effective January 1,… 1.260. It is the contemplation of Fla. Stat. § 914.01 and of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180, and of case law, that where…contemplation of F.Cr.P.R. 1.180 or Fla. Stat. § 914.01, F.S.A. For the reasons stated herein, the decision

Henzel v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-05-12T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 235 So. 2d 358, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6410

Snippet: his trial in contravention of the provisions of § 914.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.” This court after a full review

Slinsky v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-03-05T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 232 So. 2d 451

Snippet: 33 F.S.A. The second statute, F.S. 1967, Section 914.01(4), F.S.A., provides that in a felony prosecution

Melendez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1970-02-03T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 231 So. 2d 251, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910

Snippet: circumstances outlined above, were violative of § 914.01(3) FkuStat., F.S.A. (1967). See Holton v. State

Henzel v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1968-06-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 212 So. 2d 92, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5269

Snippet: his trial in contravention of the provisions of § 914.01, Fla.Stat, F.S.A. The trial of this cause was conducted…the commission of a felony is carried on. Section 914.01(4), Fla.Stat., supra; Cole v. State, Fla.App.1967

Cole v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1967-05-31T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 199 So. 2d 480, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4882

Snippet: finding of the trial judge. The requirement of § 914.01 Fla. Stat., F.S.A., that “In all prosecutions for

Adkins v. Smith

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1967-04-06T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 197 So. 2d 865, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5167

Snippet: presence of the defendant in violation of F.S.A. § 914.01 that constituted reversible error. The Florida …error unless it violates the provisions of F.S.A. § 914.01. Under the circumstances of this case the conversation

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1967-02-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 196 So. 2d 124

Snippet: suggested rule is in great part a recopying of FS 914.01: In (3) the words "at the beginning of the…cases. (d) This provision does not appear in FS 914.01 but it is a part of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure