Florida Statute 914.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 914
WITNESSES; CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 914.04

914.04 Witnesses; person not excused from testifying or producing evidence in certain prosecutions on ground testimony might incriminate him or her; use of testimony given or evidence produced.—No person who has been duly served with a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum shall be excused from attending and testifying or producing any book, paper, or other document before any court having felony trial jurisdiction, grand jury, or state attorney upon investigation, proceeding, or trial for a violation of any of the criminal statutes of this state upon the ground or for the reason that the testimony or evidence, documentary or otherwise, required of the person may tend to convict him or her of a crime or to subject him or her to a penalty or forfeiture, but no testimony so given or evidence so produced shall be received against the person upon any criminal investigation or proceeding. Such testimony or evidence, however, may be received against the person upon any criminal investigation or proceeding for perjury committed while giving such testimony or producing such evidence or for any perjury subsequently committed.

History.—s. 1, ch. 5400, 1905; s. 1, ch. 7850, 1919; RGS 6017; CGL 8311; s. 1, ch. 69-316; s. 97, ch. 70-339; s. 1, ch. 71-99; s. 36, ch. 73-334; s. 1, ch. 82-393; s. 175, ch. 83-216; s. 1, ch. 85-41; s. 1522, ch. 97-102.

Note.—Former s. 932.29.

F.S. 914.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 914.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 914.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 914.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 914.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 914.04

Total Results: 20

State of Florida v. Mark A. Desimone

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-14

Snippet: immunity or use immunity provisions of section 914.04, Florida Statutes, were applicable); Owen v. State

State of Florida v. Mark A. Desimone

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-02-14

Snippet: immunity or use immunity provisions of section 914.04, Florida Statutes, were applicable); Owen v. State

In RE: AMENDMENTS TO the RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR-BIENNIAL PETITION.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04

Citation: 267 So. 3d 891

Snippet: amount of funds used for this purpose. *914 (4) Comments on Petition. On the appointment

Celeste Chambers v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-10-04

Citation: 200 So. 3d 242, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14744

Snippet: been subject to use immunity. See § 914.04, Fla. Stat. (2015); Perez v. State,

Gardner v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-03-23

Citation: 194 So. 3d 385, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4443, 2016 WL 1123681

Snippet: the State had subpoenaed her. • See § 914.04,Stat. (2012). But the State made clear that it

Jared Bretherick v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-09

Citation: 170 So. 3d 766, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 411, 2015 WL 4112414, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 1470

Snippet: statutory transactional immunity under, section 914.04, Florida Statutes (1975)). When a defendant moves

Joseph v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-12-12

Citation: 103 So. 3d 227, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21415, 2012 WL 6166382

Snippet: under the investigative subpoena statute—section 914.04, Florida Statutes (1975). (T)he appropriate remedy

State v. Belidor

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2012-08-12

Citation: 96 So. 3d 993, 2012 WL 3705095

Snippet: departs from the essential requirements of section 914.04, Florida Statutes (2012), which subjects the respondent

Jones v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-02-16

Citation: 54 So. 3d 589, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1927, 2011 WL 520543

Snippet: Jones immunity for his testimony. While section 914.04, Florida Statutes (2010) (providing immunity for

Dennis v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-12-16

Citation: 51 So. 3d 456, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 731, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 2115, 2010 WL 5110231

Snippet: immunity or use immunity provisions of section 914.04, Florida Statutes, were applicable); Owen v. State

Govoni v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-10-07

Citation: 17 So. 3d 809, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14919, 2009 WL 2516939

Snippet: statutory transactional immunity under section 914.04, Florida Statutes (1975)). When a defendant moves

State v. Mitrani

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-10-02

Citation: 19 So. 3d 1065, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14717, 2009 WL 3149384

Snippet: derivative use immunity as provided in section 914.04, Florida Statutes (2008).1 The State then filed

McKay v. Great American Insurance Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-06-23

Citation: 876 So. 2d 666, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8803, 2004 WL 1392287

Snippet: in any venue is given pursuant to F.S. Section 914.04 as set forth herein. Nothing in this section, precludes

Grant v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-03-28

Citation: 832 So. 2d 770, 2002 WL 464697

Snippet: Rachel's. Despite the OSP's assertion that section 914.04, Florida Statutes (2001), conferred use and derivative

Zile v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-05-20

Citation: 710 So. 2d 729, 1998 WL 250710

Snippet: State, 512 So.2d 164 (Fla.1987). Florida Statutes § 914.04 previously provided for transactional immunity

Costello v. Fennelly

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-10-30

Citation: 681 So. 2d 926, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 1996 WL 625636

Snippet: 04, Florida Statutes (1995). Pursuant to section 914.04, Florida Statutes (1995), she was accorded use

State v. Polnac

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-01-03

Citation: 665 So. 2d 1095, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 20, 1996 WL 1101

Snippet: criminal prosecution under Florida Statute, Section 914.04. The trial court, however, incorrectly relied on

Randall v. Guenther

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-02-17

Citation: 650 So. 2d 1070, 1995 WL 63056

Snippet: Randall use and derivative use immunity under section 914.04, Florida Statutes (1993), in connection with Randall's

Meek v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-04-20

Citation: 636 So. 2d 543, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3728, 1994 WL 138131

Snippet: resulting cloak of transactional immunity. Section 914.04, Florida Statutes (1979) provided: Witnesses; person

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1994-02-16

Snippet: State, 168 So.2d 703 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). 12 Section 914.04, Fla. Stat. 1993. 13 See, Salem v. State, 310 So