...Finally, this court's decision in Baranko v. State,
428 So.2d 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) does not mandate the result sought by Pericola, as an actual determination of insanity was not involved therein. Although neither Rule 3.720 nor its predecessor statute, Section
921.09, Florida Statutes (1969), define "insanity" in the sentencing context, we find no error in the employment by the trial court of the standard for insanity sufficient to preclude execution of the death penalty by the Governor. Section
922.07, Florida Statutes (1969), set forth the procedures to be followed by the Governor when insanity was alleged as a defense to the execution of the death penalty. That statute, like Section
921.09, provided no legal standard for the determination of insanity....
...mment to this amendment indicates that it was intended to "set up standards for determining sanity" and to give the Governor "legal standards and professional guidelines for making his decision." In the same term in which Section
922.07 was amended, Section
921.09 was *868 repealed and replaced by Rule 3.740....