Florida Statute 925.11 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 925
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 925.11

925.11 Postsentencing DNA testing.—

(1) PETITION FOR EXAMINATION.—

(a)1. A person who has been tried and found guilty of committing a felony and has been sentenced by a court established by the laws of this state may petition that court to order the examination of physical evidence collected at the time of the investigation of the crime for which he or she has been sentenced that may contain DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) and that would exonerate that person or mitigate the sentence that person received.

2. A person who has entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to a felony prior to July 1, 2006, and has been sentenced by a court established by the laws of this state may petition that court to order the examination of physical evidence collected at the time of the investigation of the crime for which he or she has been sentenced that may contain DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) and that would exonerate that person.

(b) A petition for postsentencing DNA testing under paragraph (a) may be filed or considered at any time following the date that the judgment and sentence in the case becomes final.

(2) METHOD FOR SEEKING POSTSENTENCING DNA TESTING.—

(a) The petition for postsentencing DNA testing must be made under oath by the sentenced defendant and must include the following:

1. A statement of the facts relied on in support of the petition, including a description of the physical evidence containing DNA to be tested and, if known, the present location or the last known location of the evidence and how it was originally obtained;

2. A statement that the evidence was not previously tested for DNA or a statement that the results of any previous DNA testing were inconclusive and that subsequent scientific developments in DNA testing techniques would likely produce a definitive result establishing that the petitioner is not the person who committed the crime;

3. A statement that the sentenced defendant is innocent and how the DNA testing requested by the petition will exonerate the defendant of the crime for which the defendant was sentenced or will mitigate the sentence received by the defendant for that crime;

4. A statement that identification of the defendant is a genuinely disputed issue in the case, and why it is an issue;

5. Any other facts relevant to the petition; and

6. A certificate that a copy of the petition has been served on the prosecuting authority.

(b) Upon receiving the petition, the clerk of the court shall file it and deliver the court file to the assigned judge.

(c) The court shall review the petition and deny it if it is insufficient. If the petition is sufficient, the prosecuting authority shall be ordered to respond to the petition within 30 days.

(d) Upon receiving the response of the prosecuting authority, the court shall review the response and enter an order on the merits of the petition or set the petition for hearing.

(e) Counsel may be appointed to assist the sentenced defendant if the petition proceeds to a hearing and if the court determines that the assistance of counsel is necessary and makes the requisite finding of indigency.

(f) The court shall make the following findings when ruling on the petition:

1. Whether the sentenced defendant has shown that the physical evidence that may contain DNA still exists;

2. Whether the results of DNA testing of that physical evidence would be admissible at trial and whether there exists reliable proof to establish that the evidence has not been materially altered and would be admissible at a future hearing; and

3. Whether there is a reasonable probability that the sentenced defendant would have been acquitted or would have received a lesser sentence if the DNA evidence had been admitted at trial.

(g) If the court orders DNA testing of the physical evidence, the cost of such testing may be assessed against the sentenced defendant unless he or she is indigent. If the sentenced defendant is indigent, the state shall bear the cost of the DNA testing ordered by the court.

(h) Any DNA testing ordered by the court shall be carried out by the Department of Law Enforcement or its designee, as provided in s. 943.3251.

(i) The results of the DNA testing ordered by the court shall be provided to the court, the sentenced defendant, and the prosecuting authority.

(3) RIGHT TO APPEAL; REHEARING.—

(a) An appeal from the court’s order on the petition for postsentencing DNA testing may be taken by any adversely affected party.

(b) An order denying relief shall include a statement that the sentenced defendant has the right to appeal within 30 days after the order denying relief is entered.

(c) The sentenced defendant may file a motion for rehearing of any order denying relief within 15 days after service of the order denying relief. The time for filing an appeal shall be tolled until an order on the motion for rehearing has been entered.

(d) The clerk of the court shall serve on all parties a copy of any order rendered with a certificate of service, including the date of service.

(4) PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE.—

(a) Governmental entities that may be in possession of any physical evidence in the case, including, but not limited to, any investigating law enforcement agency, the clerk of the court, the prosecuting authority, or the Department of Law Enforcement shall maintain any physical evidence collected at the time of the crime for which a postsentencing testing of DNA may be requested.

(b) In a case in which the death penalty is imposed, the evidence shall be maintained for 60 days after execution of the sentence. In all other cases, a governmental entity may dispose of the physical evidence if the term of the sentence imposed in the case has expired and no other provision of law or rule requires that the physical evidence be preserved or retained.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2001-97; s. 1, ch. 2004-67; s. 1, ch. 2006-292.

F.S. 925.11 on Google Scholar

F.S. 925.11 on Casetext

Amendments to 925.11

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 925.11

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 925.11.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 925.11

Total Results: 20

Paul Glen Everett v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-11

Snippet: postconviction DNA testing under rule 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes. In his motion, Everett sought

YVELAN PIERRE vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-03-17

Snippet: required to make legislatively mandated findings. § 925.11(2)(f), Fla. Stat. (2022). Even if non-binding

Eric Scott Branch v. State of Florida & SC18-218 Eric Scott Branch v. Julie L. Jones, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-02-15

Citation: 236 So. 3d 981

Snippet: Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2015). Branch v. State

League of Women Voters v. Data Targeting, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-05-27

Citation: 140 So. 3d 510, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 355, 2014 WL 2186202, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1704

Snippet: out, operation of the same deadline in section 925.11(l)(b)l., *516Florida Statutes (2002), may result

Zeigler v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-02-21

Citation: 116 So. 3d 255, 2013 WL 627117, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 272

Snippet: Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes.1 For the reasons set forth below

Cardona v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-02-06

Citation: 109 So. 3d 241, 2013 WL 440143

Snippet: Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2008). Appellant filed this

Rawls v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-03-25

Citation: 56 So. 3d 920, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3999, 2011 WL 1086762

Snippet: him from obtaining the requested relief. See § 925.11(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (2001); Smith v. State, 854 So

Lee v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-02-07

Citation: 54 So. 3d 573, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 1434, 2011 WL 362235

Snippet: Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 and section 925.11, Florida Statutes. Appellant raises several issues

McDole v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-11-02

Citation: 46 So. 3d 1154, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 16610, 2010 WL 4292197

Snippet: sufficient. See Fla. R.Crim. P. *1155 3.853; § 925.11(1)(a)2.; (2)(a)1.-6., Fla. Stat. (2009). Thus,

Menendez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-08-11

Citation: 41 So. 3d 1066, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11725, 2010 WL 3154970

Snippet: contendere to a felony prior to July 1, 2006. § 925.11(1)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2006); Glenn v. State, 954

Gonzalez v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-08-11

Citation: 41 So. 3d 1050, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11711, 2010 WL 3155027

Snippet: statute addressing the same subject matter. Section 925.11(2)(a)(4), Florida Statutes (2007), mandates that

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2010-06-07

Snippet: 79-26 (1979). 8 See n. 4, supra. 9 See s. 400.925(11), Fla. Stat., defining the term for purposes of

Consalvo v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-29

Citation: 3 So. 3d 1014, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 88, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 129, 2009 WL 196364

Snippet: September 13, 2001, prior to the enactment of section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2008), and Florida Rule of Criminal

Thomas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-16

Citation: 3 So. 3d 387, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 262, 2009 WL 103154

Snippet: motion was not untimely under rule 3.853 or section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2007), we reverse and remand

Barber v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-08-06

Citation: 988 So. 2d 1170, 2008 WL 2986483

Snippet: any other secure facility for any reason. § 394.925(11), Fla. Stat. [2] Similar conclusions have been

Rivera v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-06-12

Citation: 995 So. 2d 191, 2008 WL 2369219

Snippet: court to conduct DNA testing pursuant to section 925.11, Florida Statutes (2001), or Florida Rule of Criminal

Brim v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-11-28

Citation: 969 So. 2d 552, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18716, 2007 WL 4181029

Snippet: Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 and section 925.11(1)(a)(2), Florida Statutes (2006). The postconviction

Bain v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-08-29

Citation: 963 So. 2d 913, 2007 WL 2428514

Snippet: process. However, due to an amendment to section 925.11, Florida Statutes, enacted on June 23, 2006, no

Willacy v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-06-28

Citation: 967 So. 2d 131, 2007 WL 1836848

Snippet: perpetrator. The applicable law is set forth in section 925.11(2), Florida Statutes (2006), and Florida Rule of

Amendments to Fla. Rules of Final Arguments

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-05-03

Citation: 957 So. 2d 1164, 2007 WL 1285808

Snippet: section 1, Laws of Florida, creating sections 925.11 and 943.3241, Florida Statutes, without addressing