News

Florida Statute 932.62 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

F.S. 932.62 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:

Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 932.62

The 2022 Florida Statutes (including 2022 Special Session A and 2023 Special Session B)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 932
PROVISIONS SUPPLEMENTAL TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 932.62

932.62 Date for arraignment upon transfer; petitioner not incarcerated.—If the person whose case is transferred is at liberty on bond or on his or her own recognizance, the appearance date for arraignment to the court to which the cause has been transferred shall be within 45 days from the date of transfer, and, if the defendant is on his or her own recognizance, the defendant shall sign an agreement to appear before the court to which the case is transferred as a part of his or her petition to transfer. If the defendant is at liberty on a cash or property bond, the clerk of the transferring court shall endorse the new returnable date on its face prior to transfer.

History.—s. 1, ch. 70-372; s. 1566, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 932.62 on Google Scholar

F.S. 932.62 on Casetext

Amendments to 932.62

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 932.62

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 932.62.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

U.S. Supreme Court

11th Cir. - Ct. App.11th Cir. - MD FL11th Cir. - ND FL11th Cir. - SD FLFed. Reg.Secondary Sources - All

State, Negron v. Court of Record
286 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973) Cited 1 times
Motion to dismiss
"The provision in § 932.62, F.S.A. that the appearance date for arraignment to the court to which the case is transferred `shall be within 45 days from the transfer' is not followed by any prohibition of arraignment after 45 days nor any provision for dismissal for failure to arraign within such time. The general rule of statutory construction of provisions concerning the time a thing is to be done where no provision prohibiting the doing of it later is included is that such provisions are merely directory. 30 Fla.Jur., Statutes, § 6, p. 98. Such construction of § 932.61 F.S.A. is fortified by examination in the following section of the same legislative act ( 932.63 F.S.A.) requiring the prosecuting attorney to file charges within 30 days after receipt of the petition and providing that if he fails to take action within 30 days the cause shall be dismissed by the clerk. It seems reasonable to conclude that if it was the legislative intent that failure to arraign within 45 days would require dismissal of the action a similar provision for dismissal for failure to arraign within such time would have been included in § 732.62 [ 932.62] F.S.A."
PAGE 583
Cases from cite.case.law:
In KONKAR MARITIME ENTERPRISES, S. A. As KONKAR PIONEER, v. COMPAGNIE BELGE D AFFRETEMENT, As a, 668 F. Supp. 267 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . profits ($15,-191.93), added to the amount deducted from charter hire for time spent at Mobile ($120,-932.62 . . .
In DAVIS,, 38 B.R. 585 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1984)

. . . Dec. 27, 1982) ($932.62 tax refund); In re Kee, Case No. 382-00030 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Tenn. . . .
STATE NEGRON, v. COURT OF RECORD IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY,, 286 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . that the relator had not been arraigned within 45 days from the date of transfer as stated in Section 932.62 . . . The question here to be determined is whether the time element of 45 days in Section 932.62, F.S. is . . . “The provision in § 932.62, F.S.A. that the appearance date for arraignment to the court to which the . . . provision for dismissal for failure to arraign within such time would have been included in § 732.62 [932.62 . . .