Home
Jacksonville Location Phone Call/Texting Policy How do Fees Work?
Criminal Defense DUI Defense Foreclosure Defense Copyright Workers Compensation Attorney Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statutes Georgia Code Jacksonville Accident Attorney Real Estate Attorney Jacksonville Florida Criminal Lawyer Jacksonville Notary Public
Menu
904-383-7448
Florida Statute 932.706 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 932.706 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 932.706

The 2022 Florida Statutes (including 2022 Special Session A and 2023 Special Session B)
Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 932
PROVISIONS SUPPLEMENTAL TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 932.706
932.706 Forfeiture training requirements.—The Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission shall develop a standardized course of training for basic recruits and continuing education which shall be designed to develop proficiency in the seizure and forfeiture of property under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. The curriculum for the course of training and continuing education must include, but is not limited to, racial and ethnic sensitivity and a review of cases in this state which involve searches and seizures, the use of drug-courier profiles by law enforcement agencies, and the use of an order to stop based on a pretext.
History.—s. 6, ch. 92-54; s. 6, ch. 95-265; s. 145, ch. 2005-2.

F.S. 932.706 on Google Scholar

F.S. 932.706 on Casetext

Amendments to 932.706


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 932.706
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 932.706.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

10 Cases from Casetext:Date Descending

U.S. Supreme Court11th Cir. - Ct. App.11th Cir. - MD FL11th Cir. - ND FL11th Cir. - SD FLFed. Reg.Secondary Sources - All

  1. Marolf v. Miami-Dade Cnty.

    172 So. 3d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
    Marolf's primary argument is that the evidence presented at the hearing failed to establish probable cause because the currency does not meet the definition of “contraband article” or “instrumentality” under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701 –932.706, Florida Statutes (2014).
    PAGE 452

  2. Sanchez v. City of W. Palm Beach

    149 So. 3d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
    In a forfeiture proceeding under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, §§ 932.701 –932.706, Florida Statutes (2013) (the “Act”), Orlando Sanchez appeals from a non-final order entered after an adversarial preliminary hearing finding probable cause to support the City of West Palm Beach's continued seizure of $11,165.00 in U.S. currency. Because the circuit court prevented Sanchez from calling witnesses and introducing evidence at the hearing, we reverse and remand for a new adversarial preliminary hearing.
    PAGE 93

  3. Campbell v. Racetrack Bingo, Inc.

    Case No. 1D10-5536 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2011)
    Despite the sheriff's argument to the contrary, property connected to a violation of gambling laws, such as section 849.0931, is not per se "used, in violation of" the FCFA (§§ 932.701- 932.706, Fla. Stat.). Section 932.703(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides for forfeiture only of property "used in violation of" the FCFA or "by means of which any violation of" the FCFA takes place.
    PAGE 3

  4. Gomez v. Village of Pinecrest

    41 So. 3d 180 (Fla. 2010)   Cited 31 times
    Sections 932.701 through 932.706, Florida Statutes (2008), constitute the Act. Section 932.703(1)(a) provides:
    PAGE 182

    Cases from cite.case.law:

    MAROLF v. MIAMI- DADE COUNTY,, 172 So. 3d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

    . . . contraband article” or “instrumentality” under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701-932.706 . . .

    SANCHEZ, v. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH,, 149 So. 3d 92 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

    . . . In a forfeiture proceeding under the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, §§ 932.701-932.706, Florida Statutes . . .

    MOSTOWICZ, v. J. ISRAEL,, 142 So. 3d 976 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

    . . . action for forfeiture of the seized cash pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, §§ 932.701-932.706 . . .

    CAMPBELL, As v. RACETRACK BINGO, INC. L. M. II, Ft. L. L. C. L. L. C., 75 So. 3d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

    . . . used or intended to be used in violation of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701-932.706 . . . gambling laws, such as section 849.0931, is not per se “used, in violation of’ the FCFA (§§ 932.701-932.706 . . .

    GOMEZ, v. VILLAGE OF PINECREST,, 41 So. 3d 180 (Fla. 2010)

    . . . Sections 932.701 through 932.706, Florida Statutes (2008), constitute the Act. . . .