Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 934.23 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 934.23 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 934.23

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 934
SECURITY OF COMMUNICATIONS; SURVEILLANCE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 934.23
934.23 Required disclosure of customer communications or records.
(1) An investigative or law enforcement officer may require the disclosure by a provider of electronic communication service of the contents of a wire or electronic communication that has been in electronic storage in an electronic communications system for 180 days or less only pursuant to a warrant issued by the judge of a court of competent jurisdiction. As used in this section, the term “a court of competent jurisdiction” means a court that has jurisdiction over the investigation or that is otherwise authorized by law. An investigative or law enforcement officer may require the disclosure by a provider of electronic communication services of the contents of a wire or electronic communication that has been in electronic storage in an electronic communications system for more than 180 days by the means available under subsection (2).
(2) An investigative or law enforcement officer may require a provider of remote computing service to disclose the contents of any wire or electronic communication to which this subsection is made applicable by subsection (3):
(a) Without required notice to the subscriber or customer if the investigative or law enforcement officer obtains a warrant issued by the judge of a court of competent jurisdiction; or
(b) With prior notice, or with delayed notice pursuant to s. 934.25, from the investigative or law enforcement officer to the subscriber or customer if the investigative or law enforcement officer:
1. Uses a subpoena; or
2. Obtains a court order for such disclosure under subsection (5).
(3) Subsection (2) is applicable with respect to any electronic communication that is held or maintained on a remote computing service:
(a) On behalf of a subscriber or customer of such service and received by means of electronic transmission from, or created by means of computer processing of communications received by means of electronic transmission from, a subscriber or customer of such service.
(b) Solely for the purposes of providing storage or computer processing services to a subscriber or customer, if the provider is not authorized to access the contents of any such communication for purposes of providing any service other than storage or computer processing.
(4)(a) An investigative or law enforcement officer may require a provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service to disclose a record or other information pertaining to a subscriber or customer of such service, not including the contents of a communication, only when the investigative or law enforcement officer:
1. Obtains a warrant issued by the judge of a court of competent jurisdiction;
2. Obtains a court order for such disclosure under subsection (5);
3. Has the consent of the subscriber or customer to such disclosure; or
4. Seeks information under paragraph (b).
(b) A provider of electronic communication service or remote computing service shall disclose to an investigative or law enforcement officer the name; address; local and long-distance telephone connection records, or records of session times or durations; length of service, including the starting date of service; types of services used; telephone or instrument number or other subscriber number or identity, including any temporarily assigned network address; and means and source of payment, including any credit card or bank account number of a subscriber to or customer of such service when the governmental entity uses a subpoena or obtains such information in the manner specified in paragraph (a) for obtaining information under that paragraph.
(c) An investigative or law enforcement officer who receives records or information under this subsection is not required to provide notice to a subscriber or customer.
(5) A court order for disclosure under subsection (2), subsection (3), or subsection (4) shall issue only if the investigative or law enforcement officer offers specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe the contents of a wire or electronic communication or the records of other information sought are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation. A court issuing an order pursuant to this section, on a motion made promptly by the service provider, may quash or modify such order if the information or records requested are unusually voluminous in nature or compliance with such order otherwise would cause an undue burden on such provider.
(6) No cause of action shall lie in any court against any provider of wire or electronic communication service, its officers, employees, agents, or other specified persons for providing information, facilities, or assistance in accordance with the terms of a court order, warrant, subpoena, or certification under ss. 934.21-934.28.
(7)(a) A provider of wire or electronic communication services or a remote computing service, upon the request of an investigative or law enforcement officer, shall take all necessary steps to preserve records and other evidence in its possession pending the issuance of a court order or other process.
(b) Records referred to in paragraph (a) shall be retained for a period of 90 days, which shall be extended for an additional 90 days upon a renewed request by an investigative or law enforcement officer.
(8) A provider of electronic communication service, a remote computing service, or any other person who furnished assistance pursuant to this section shall be held harmless from any claim and civil liability resulting from the disclosure of information pursuant to this section and shall be reasonably compensated for reasonable expenses incurred in providing such assistance.
History.s. 9, ch. 88-184; s. 10, ch. 89-269; s. 13, ch. 2000-369; s. 8, ch. 2002-72; s. 2, ch. 2003-71.

F.S. 934.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 934.23 on Casetext

Amendments to 934.23


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 934.23
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 934.23.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 934.23

Total Results: 10

STATE OF FLORIDA v. DANNY MARTIN

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-11-27

Snippet: Office applied for court orders under sections 934.23, 934.42, and 92.605, Florida Statutes (2012), which

ANTHONY FERRARI v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-11-21

Citation: 260 So. 3d 295

Snippet: subpoena, arguing that the State violated section 934.23, Florida Statutes, and the Fourth Amendment.

Rafael Andres v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-20

Citation: 254 So. 3d 283

Snippet: material to an ongoing criminal investigation." § 934.23(5), Fla. Stat. (2005). There is no requirement

STATE OF FLORIDA v. QUINTON REDELL SYLVESTRE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-09-05

Citation: 254 So. 3d 986

Snippet: the order do not require probable cause. See §§ 934.23, .42, Fla. Stat. (2012). We affirm the circuit

Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-10-16

Citation: 152 So. 3d 504, 92 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 587, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 617, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 3072

Snippet: version of the Stored Communications Act, section 934.23(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), allowed a law enforcement

Johnson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-03-06

Citation: 110 So. 3d 954, 2013 WL 811656, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3556

Snippet: failed to comply with the requirements of section 934.23, Florida Statutes (2003). Several chain drugstores

Tracey v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-09-07

Citation: 69 So. 3d 992, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14054, 2011 WL 3903075

Snippet: Fla. Stat. (2009). Similar to the SCA, section 934.23 allows a law enforcement officer to require a "provider

State v. Oliveras

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-07-22

Citation: 65 So. 3d 1162, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 2011 WL 2923696

Snippet: failure to comply with the requirements of section 934.23, Florida Statutes (2009), rendered the information

Mitchell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-12-30

Citation: 25 So. 3d 632, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20396, 2009 WL 5126226

Snippet: because the State had not complied with section 934.23, Florida Statutes (2007). The court suppressed

Figueroa v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-04-08

Citation: 870 So. 2d 897, 2004 WL 741425

Snippet: subpoena. The foundation for the request was section 934.23(4), Florida Statutes (2000), a statute that authorized