Syfert Injury Law Firm

Lanique Woods v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-09-11T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: additional $123 in court costs. §§ 775.083(2), 938.03, 938.06(1), 938.19(2), Fla. Stat. (2021). But an additional

Kahasim Rashid Brown v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2022-09-21T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: s written order. See §§ 938.01, 938.03, 938.05, 938.06, 938.07, 938.13, 938.19, 939.185, 775.083(2), 318.18

Robert B. Talbot v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-03-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 159 So. 3d 365

Snippet: a $20 surcharge on the fine pursuant to section 938.06, and (5) imposing a $100 indigent legal assistance…imposed on that fine pursuant to sections 938.04 and 938.06, 1 must be reversed. See Nix v… 1 . Effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06 was amended to provide that the $20 assessment

Eric Michael Crapser v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-09-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 148 So. 3d 794

Snippet: $20 cost pursuant *795 to section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2007), was erroneous because

Colson v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-05-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 114 So. 3d 415

Snippet: Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes, would have been stricken as … well. However, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06 was amended to provide, that the $20 assessment

Sharpe v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-05-22T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 115 So. 3d 1021

Snippet: Statutes; and a $20 court cost pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes. Because the trial court failed

Youman v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-05-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 112 So. 3d 693

Snippet: the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06(1), Florida Statutes, in all six cases. The trial… the particular facts of these two cases. See § 938.06(1), Fla. Stat. (2008); Kirkland,, 106 So.3d at …imposing the $20 court cost pursuant to section 938.06, as amended, effective July 1, 2010). Accordingly…Statutes, and the $20 court cost imposed under section 938.06(1), Florida Statutes (2008), in 1D12-2470 and 1D12

Alvarez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-04-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 111 So. 3d 969

Snippet: recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment

Baity v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-04-16T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 111 So. 3d 267

Snippet: additional surcharge of $20 pursuant to section 938.06(1), Florida Statutes (2009), because the court

Sims v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-04-08T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 110 So. 3d 975

Snippet: Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06(1), Florida Statutes, must also be stricken. See…holding that the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06(1) is mandatory whether or not a fine is imposed

DeSalvo v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-02-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 107 So. 3d 1185

Snippet: surcharges imposed pursuant to sections 938.04 ($10) and 938.06 *1187($20) because these amounts were not separately

Spear v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-01-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 109 So. 3d 232

Snippet: programs in criminal cases pursuant to section 938.06(1), Florida Statutes (2010), is mandatory regardless…fine is imposed. Prior to July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) provided in part, “In addition to any fine prescribed… 1st DCA 2003). The Legislature amended section 938.06(1) effective July 1, 2010, to provide *233that …imposed pursuant to the 2010 version of section 938.06 because no fine was imposed. See Pruitt v. State… to our Pullam opinion, which addressed section 938.06 prior to the amendment. One day after the Pruitt

Giles v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-01-10T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 103 So. 3d 1058

Snippet: the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06 must also be stricken. See Sanders v. State, 101

Kirkland v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-01-02T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 106 So. 3d 4

Snippet: court did not impose a fine, pursuant to section 938.06(1), Fla. Stat (2009), the $20 imposition of court…recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment

Rodriguez v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-12-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 104 So. 3d 1199

Snippet: the Crime Stoppers Trust Fund pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2009). Because the trial court

Burke v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-11-26T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 101 So. 3d 406

Snippet: strike the $20 court cost imposed under section 938.06(1), Florida Statutes (cost for crime stoppers programs… (holding that assessment authorized by section 938.06(1) may only be imposed if court also imposes a

Harris v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-11-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 100 So. 3d 245

Snippet: the $20 court cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2009), because no fine was properly

Sanders v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-10-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 101 So. 3d 373

Snippet: Stoppers Trust Fund imposed pursuant to section 938.06(1), Florida Statutes (2009), and the $100 cost …recognize that, effective July 1, 2010, section 938.06(1) was amended to provide that the $20 assessment

Pruitt v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-10-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 98 So. 3d 231

Snippet: imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2010), because no fine was imposed

Pruitt v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-10-02T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 98 So. 3d 237

Snippet: imposition of the $20 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.06, Florida Statutes (2010), because no fine was imposed