Florida Statute 942.02 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 942
INTERSTATE EXTRADITION OF WITNESSES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 942.02

942.02 Summoning witness in this state to testify in another state.—

(1) If a judge of a court of record, in any state which by its laws has made provision for commanding persons within that state to attend and testify in this state, certifies under the seal of such court that there is a criminal prosecution pending in such court, or that a grand jury investigation has commenced or is about to commence, that a person being within this state is a material witness in such prosecution or grand jury investigation, and that that person’s presence will be required for a specified number of days, upon presentation of such certificate to any judge of a court of record in the county in which such person is, such judge shall fix a time and place for a hearing and shall make an order directing the witness to appear at a time and place certain for the hearing. The witness shall at all times be entitled to counsel.

(2) If at a hearing the judge determines that the witness is material and necessary, that it will not cause undue hardship to the witness to be compelled to attend and testify in the prosecution or a grand jury investigation in the other state, and that the laws of the state in which the prosecution is pending, or grand jury investigation has commenced or is about to commence, will give to the witness protection from arrest and the service of civil and criminal process, the judge shall issue a summons, with a copy of the certificate attached, directing the witness to attend and testify in the court where the prosecution is pending, or where a grand jury investigation has commenced or is about to commence at a time and place specified in the summons. In any such hearing the certificate shall be prima facie evidence of all the facts stated therein.

(3) If said certificate recommends that the witness be taken into immediate custody and delivered to an officer of the requesting state to assure her or his attendance in the requesting state, such judge may, in lieu of notification of the hearing, direct that such witness be forthwith brought before her or him for said hearing; and the judge at the hearing being satisfied of the desirability of such custody and delivery, for which determination the certificate shall be prima facie proof of such desirability, may, in lieu of issuing subpoena or summons, order that said witness be forthwith taken in custody and delivered to an officer of the requesting state.

(4) If the witness, who is summoned as above provided, after being paid or tendered by some properly authorized person the sum of 10 cents a mile for each mile by the ordinary traveled route to and from the court where the prosecution is pending and $5 for each day that the witness is required to travel and attend as a witness, fails without good cause to attend and testify as directed in the summons, the witness shall be punished in the manner provided for the punishment of any witness who disobeys a summons issued from a court of record in this state.

History.—s. 2, ch. 20458, 1941; s. 1, ch. 61-491; s. 1625, ch. 97-102.

F.S. 942.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 942.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 942.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 942.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 942.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 942.02

Total Results: 20

State v. Alain L. Gonzalez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-10

Citation: 212 So. 3d 1094, 2017 WL 945567, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3198

Snippet: answer a subpoena in this state pursuant to section 942.02, Florida Statutes (2005), because the information

Ulloa v. CMI, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-07

Citation: 133 So. 3d 914, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 804, 2013 WL 5942299, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2420

Snippet: found. Id. As this is a reciprocal law, section 942.02 provides the procedures for a Florida court to

CMI, Inc. v. Ulloa

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-09-16

Citation: 73 So. 3d 787, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14664, 2011 WL 4102296

Snippet: attendance of the witness in the other state. § 942.02(1). The prevailing view is that the Uniform Law

State v. Bastos

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-06-11

Citation: 985 So. 2d 37, 2008 WL 2356368

Snippet: compelling the attendance of the witness. Id. § 942.02. In this case, the county court issued its certificate

Mastrapa v. South Florida Money Laundering Strike Force

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-04-26

Citation: 928 So. 2d 421, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5959, 2006 WL 1148642

Snippet: Circuit — and a proceeding begun, pursuant to section 942.02, in the Florida court. The Strike Force produced

Hodgdon v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-07-05

Citation: 789 So. 2d 958, 2001 WL 746650

Snippet: probation on the second offense." Tripp, 622 So.2d at 942.[2] At the root of our decision was a desire to effectuate

Skakel v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-07-28

Citation: 738 So. 2d 468, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10082, 1999 WL 543262

Snippet: a grand jury in Connecticut pursuant to section 942.02, Florida Statutes (1997). Chapter 942 is entitled

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1996-03-14

Snippet: state may include SSI in the program. 2 Section 409.942(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). 3 Section 409.942(3), Fla.

Delit v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-07-17

Citation: 583 So. 2d 1083, 1991 WL 128336

Snippet: the trial court erred in concluding that section 942.02, Florida Statutes, did not extend to a subpoena

In re Superior Court

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-18

Citation: 471 So. 2d 171, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1527, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14632

Snippet: materiality and necessity as required by section 942.02(2), Florida Statutes (1983). See generally New

Am. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. ATLANTIC INV. CORP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-08-31

Citation: 436 So. 2d 442

Snippet: have been established, Christy v. Burch [25 Fla. 942, 2 So. 258] holds that a liberal presumption will

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1981-01-09

Snippet: witnesses in this state to testify in another state (s. 942.02) and summoning of witnesses from another state

Miami Holding Corp. v. Matthews

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1975-04-15

Citation: 311 So. 2d 802

Snippet: requirements of the law. Christy v. Burch, 25 Fla. 942, 2 So. 258 (1889). Thus, it is clear that plaintiffs

McGrath v. People of the State of New York

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1972-02-22

Citation: 258 So. 2d 291, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7210

Snippet: involved here is authorized by and in conformity to § 942.02 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. On remand of this cause to the

Terl v. State ex rel. Grand Jury of Baltimore City

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-07-08

Citation: 237 So. 2d 830, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6248

Snippet: Act (Ch. 942, F.S. 1969, F.S.A.). Pursuant to § 942.02(2) of said Act the court below found; among other

Epstein v. New York

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-11-12

Citation: 157 So. 2d 705

Snippet: may provide.” As has been pointed out above, § 942.02(1) provides for the presentation of an appropriate

Application of People of State of New York

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-01-22

Citation: 100 So. 2d 149

Snippet: although there is no provision in our statute, Sec. 942.02, Florida Statutes 1955, F.S.A., for such a bond

Fries v. Griffin

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-01-15

Citation: 35 Fla. 212

Snippet: 424. The decision in Christie vs. Burch, 25 Fla. 942, 2 South. Rep. 258, does not conflict with the rule

Kellogg v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1895-01-15

Citation: 35 Fla. 99

Snippet: 519, 5 South. 263; Christy vs. Burch, 25 Fla. 942, 2 South. 258; 1 Beach’s Modern Equity Practice, 366

Ballard v. Lippman Bros.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1893-06-15

Citation: 32 Fla. 481

Snippet: settled in this court-Christy vs. Burch, 25 Fla., 942, 2 South. Rep., 258. It is clear then, on the showing