Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 947.23 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 947.23 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 947.23 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 947.23

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 947
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW; CONDITIONAL RELEASE; CONTROL RELEASE; PAROLE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 947.23
947.23 Action of commission upon arrest of parolee.
(1) Within 30 days after the arrest of a person charged with violation of the terms and conditions of her or his parole, the parolee shall be afforded a prompt preliminary hearing, conducted by a member of the commission or its duly authorized representative, at or near the place of violation or arrest to determine if there is probable cause or reasonable grounds to believe that the parolee has committed a violation of the terms or conditions of her or his parole. The parolee may knowingly execute a waiver of this hearing, up until the time of such hearing, provided the consequences of such action have been fully explained. If the parolee elects to proceed with the preliminary hearing:
(a) The parolee shall be afforded a timely notice of the preliminary hearing, which notice shall state the purpose of the hearing and state the alleged violation.
(b) The parolee shall be permitted to cross-examine adverse witnesses, unless it is determined that good cause exists not to allow such examination.
(c) The parolee shall be allowed to call witnesses as provided in subsection (3), and present evidence in her or his own behalf.
(d) The parolee may be represented by counsel.

The findings based on the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing shall be made available to the parolee either immediately following the preliminary hearing or within a reasonable time thereafter.

(2) If the preliminary hearing results in a finding of probable cause or reasonable grounds to believe that a violation of the terms or conditions of parole has occurred, any one or more commissioners or a duly authorized representative of the commission shall convene a final revocation hearing on the alleged violation. The parolee shall appear at the final hearing in person, and, if the parolee desires, she or he may be represented by counsel. At the final hearing, the state and the parolee may introduce such evidence as is necessary and pertinent to the charge of parole violation.
(3) Any one or more commissioners or a duly authorized representative of the commission may administer oaths and compel the attendance of witnesses at such hearing by the issuance of summons, subpoenas, and subpoenas duces tecum. Subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum shall be enforceable by appropriate proceedings in circuit court, and the failure to comply with a court order enforcing a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum shall constitute contempt of court. Any one or more commissioners or a duly authorized representative of the commission may issue subpoenas on behalf of the state or the parolee. The commission may decline a request to subpoena a witness whose testimony it finds would be cumulative, irrelevant, or nonprobative. The party requesting the subpoenas shall furnish to the commissioner, commissioners, or duly authorized representative of the commission the names and addresses of her or his proposed witnesses at least 10 days prior to the hearing date.
(4) At the hearing, the parolee shall be informed orally and in writing of:
(a) The violation of the terms and conditions of parole with which the parolee has been charged.
(b) The right to be represented by counsel.
(c) The right to be heard in person.
(d) The right to secure, present, and compel the attendance of witnesses as provided in subsection (3) and the production of documents on her or his behalf.
(e) The right of access to all evidence used against her or him.
(f) The right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, unless the commissioner, commissioners, or duly authorized representative of the commission conducting the hearing finds specifically, and states in writing, good cause not to allow the confrontation.
(5)(a) At any such hearing convened by one or more commissioners or a duly authorized representative of the commission, the accused may waive her or his right to proceed further if, after being informed of her or his rights and after being advised of the consequences of a waiver in regard to the nature of the order which may be entered as a result of such waiver, the accused affirms, in writing, knowledge and understanding of such rights and consequences and elects, in writing, to execute the waiver.
(b) The accused violator may execute a waiver, in writing, of a final revocation hearing prior to the commencement of such hearing. Such waiver may be executed before a member of the commission or a duly authorized representative of the commission after the accused violator has been informed of her or his rights and after she or he has been advised of the consequences of a waiver. Within 14 days after the execution of a waiver, the accused may withdraw the waiver by executing a withdrawal of waiver before a notary public and forwarding the original of that withdrawal to the commission.
(6) Within a reasonable time after the hearing, the commissioner, commissioners, or duly authorized representative of the commission who conducted the hearing shall make findings of fact in regard to the alleged parole violation.
(a) If the hearing was conducted by three or more commissioners, a majority of them shall enter an order determining whether the charges of parole violation have been sustained, based on the findings of fact made by them. By such order they shall revoke the parole and return the parolee to prison to serve the sentence theretofore imposed upon her or him, reinstate the original order of parole, order the placement of the parolee into a community control program as set forth in s. 948.101, or enter such other order as is proper.
(b) If the hearing was conducted by one or two commissioners or a duly authorized representative of the commission, at least two commissioners shall enter an order determining whether or not the charges of parole violation have been sustained, based on the findings of fact made by the commissioner, commissioners, or duly authorized representative of the commission. The commissioners, by such order, shall revoke the parole and return the parolee to prison to serve the sentence theretofore imposed upon her or him, reinstate the original order of parole, order the placement of the parolee into a community control program as set forth in s. 948.101, or enter such other order as is proper.
(c) If the disposition after the revocation hearing is to place the parolee into a community control program, the commission shall be guided by the procedures and requirements provided in chapter 948 which apply to the courts regarding the development and implementation of community control.

However, any decision to revoke parole shall be based on a violation of a term or condition specifically enumerated in the parole release order. In a case in which parole is revoked, the majority of the commission or the two commissioners shall make a written statement of the evidence relied on and the reasons for revoking parole.

(7) Whenever a parole is revoked by the commission and the parolee is ordered by the commission to be returned to prison, the parolee, by reason of her or his misconduct, shall be deemed to forfeit all gain-time or commutation of time for good conduct, as provided for by law, earned up to the date of her or his release on parole. Nothing herein shall deprive the prisoner of her or his right to gain-time or commutation of time for good conduct, as provided by law, from the date the prisoner is returned to prison.
History.s. 17, ch. 20519, 1941; s. 4, ch. 21775, 1943; s. 1, ch. 74-241; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 19, ch. 78-417; s. 11, ch. 79-42; s. 17, ch. 82-171; s. 2, ch. 82-193; ss. 15, 34, ch. 83-131; s. 6, ch. 85-295; s. 37, ch. 86-183; s. 67, ch. 88-122; ss. 45, 47, ch. 89-526; s. 17, ch. 89-531; s. 20, ch. 90-337; s. 1, ch. 93-2; s. 1682, ch. 97-102; s. 37, ch. 2004-373.

F.S. 947.23 on Google Scholar

F.S. 947.23 on CourtListener

Amendments to 947.23


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 947.23

Total Results: 31

Bernhardt v. State

288 So. 2d 490

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1974 | Docket: 1270651

Cited 182 times | Published

§ 949.10 shall be given a hearing pursuant to § 947.23 or § 948.06. The hearing shall be held within

Peters v. State

984 So. 2d 1227, 2008 WL 1901668

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 1, 2008 | Docket: 76966

Cited 19 times | Published

process requirements outlined in Morrissey. Compare § 947.23, Fla. Stat. (2003) (outlining parole revocation

Turner v. Wainwright

379 So. 2d 148

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 1980 | Docket: 1681228

Cited 8 times | Published

entitled to be present. See, Florida Statutes, § 947.23(6). This court must assume that the Legislature

Brumit v. Wainwright

290 So. 2d 39

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1974 | Docket: 1510325

Cited 8 times | Published

Respondent next urges upon us the provisions of F.S. § 947.23(1), F.S.A. providing that the Parole Commission

Dees v. State

295 So. 2d 296

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 22, 1974 | Docket: 1760436

Cited 7 times | Published

Volusia County relating to constitutionality of Section 947.23, Florida Statutes, as it is incorporated in

Floyd v. PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N

509 So. 2d 919, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 315, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2013

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1987 | Docket: 1361810

Cited 5 times | Published

23-21.22(7), and the final revocation hearing, see § 947.23, Fla. Stat. (1985). In conclusion, for the foregoing

Wainwright v. Evans

403 So. 2d 1123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1981 | Docket: 1250906

Cited 5 times | Published

949.10 shall be given a hearing pursuant to section 947.23 or section 948.06 within ten days. Section

Jackson v. Mayo

73 So. 2d 881, 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1759

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 1954 | Docket: 1795863

Cited 4 times | Published

17, 1954, did not meet the requirements of Section 947.23, F.S. 1951, *882 F.S.A. In this connection

Smith v. Moore

782 So. 2d 955, 2001 WL 345199

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2001 | Docket: 456555

Cited 3 times | Published

committed to jail pending hearings pursuant to section 947.23, Florida Statutes, for parole violations and

Taylor v. Dugger

567 So. 2d 1000, 1990 WL 153197

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1990 | Docket: 1381016

Cited 3 times | Published

Florida Parole Commission did not comply with Section 947.23, Florida Statutes (1987), which deals with

Gibbs v. Wainwright

302 So. 2d 175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1974 | Docket: 1758616

Cited 3 times | Published

is forfeited by operation of the provisions of § 947.23(2) F.S. whenever a parole is revoked. Dear v.

Cottle v. Wainwright

338 F. Supp. 819, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14910

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 1972 | Docket: 2049237

Cited 3 times | Published

2d 449, 267 N.E.2d 238 (1970). [8] Fla.Stat. § 947.23(1), F.S.A. [9] Indigent Federal parolees have

Carson v. Bishop

378 So. 2d 882

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1979 | Docket: 1795690

Cited 2 times | Published

parolee violates a condition of his parole, and Section 947.23 demands a parole revocation hearing "[a]s soon

Mattern v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

707 So. 2d 806, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1393, 1998 WL 64064

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1998 | Docket: 1260220

Cited 1 times | Published

, 408 U.S. at 489, 92 S.Ct. at 2604; see also § 947.23, Fla. Stat. (1997). With respect to appellant's

Hansen v. Wainwright

493 So. 2d 38, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1747

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1986 | Docket: 1671763

Cited 1 times | Published

subsequent felony arrests, are governed by Section 947.23, Florida Statutes (1979), which formerly had

State v. Sylvester

401 So. 2d 1123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1981 | Docket: 1686554

Cited 1 times | Published

notwithstanding Section 947.23, does not mean that the normal adjudicatory procedures of Section 947.23 must be

Fla. Inst. Legal Serv. v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm.

391 So. 2d 247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1980 | Docket: 1173960

Cited 1 times | Published

conducted by the Commission or a Commissioner. Section 947.23. From that it does not follow that the Commission

Department of Corrections v. Williams

901 So. 2d 169, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 2006, 2005 WL 415109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 23, 2005 | Docket: 64837999

Published

to revoke conditional release after a hearing. § 947.23. In issuing the writ, the circuit court prohibited

Gibson v. Florida Parole Commission

801 So. 2d 286, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17501, 2001 WL 1577579

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 2001 | Docket: 64810656

Published

having been afforded a hearing as required by section 947.23, Florida Statutes. The circuit court denied

Hansen v. Duggar

536 So. 2d 1169, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 133, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5807, 1988 WL 139531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1988 | Docket: 64639636

Published

the preliminary hearing was untimely under section 947.23, Florida Statutes (1979), there was sufficient

Hansen v. Fontana

517 So. 2d 714, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2804, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11566, 1987 WL 2662

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1987 | Docket: 64631770

Published

County. After a preliminary hearing pursuant to section 947.23, Florida Statutes, the first allegation was

Hansen v. Dugger

515 So. 2d 1345, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2663, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11286, 1987 WL 1902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1987 | Docket: 64631159

Published

cause for the parole violations pursuant to section 947.23, Florida Statutes. The hearing was originally

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: May 1, 1984 | Docket: 3255178

Published

be taken with reference to such violations. Section 947.23(1), F.S., requires that within 30 days after

Proctor v. Wainwright

408 So. 2d 793, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 18899

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1982 | Docket: 64587337

Published

well. Section 947.23(2), Florida Statutes (1979). Morrissey, as well as the statute, Section 947.23(1),

Florida Institutional Legal Services, Inc. v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

391 So. 2d 247, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 26, 1980 | Docket: 64579225

Published

conducted bythe Commission or a Commissioner. Section 947.23. From that it does not follow that the Commission

DiCaprio v. Polk

335 So. 2d 857, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13958

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1976 | Docket: 64554619

Published

§ 949.10 shall be given a hearing pursuant to § 947.23 or § 948.06. The hearing shall be held within

Moore v. Wainwright

253 So. 2d 736, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 1971 | Docket: 64522700

Published

App.1967), in which we held that the statute (Section 947.23, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.), allowing a parolee

Ruiter v. Wainwright

251 So. 2d 888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1971 | Docket: 64521915

Published

duly considered and the same is hereby denied. § 947.23, F.S., F.S.A.; Shiplett v. Wainwright (Fla.App

Shiplett v. Wainwright

198 So. 2d 647, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1967 | Docket: 64500860

Published

the parolee is guilty of parole violation. Section 947.23(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., relating to hearings

Sumrall v. Cochran

127 So. 2d 447, 1961 Fla. LEXIS 2349

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1961 | Docket: 60196834

Published

not had a hearing such as was contemplated by Section 947.23, Florida Statutes 19S9, F.S.A., be discharged

Senk v. Cochran

116 So. 2d 244

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 1959 | Docket: 60193789

Published

afforded a hearing in the manner contemplated by Section 947.23, Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A., it is, therefore