Florida Statutes

Fla. Stat. § 948.03 (2025)

Terms and conditions of probation.

✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us JustiaFla. Statutes CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

948.03 Terms and conditions of probation.—

(1) The court shall determine the terms and conditions of probation. Conditions specified in this section do not require oral pronouncement at the time of sentencing and may be considered standard conditions of probation. These conditions may include among them the following, that the probationer or offender in community control shall:

(a) Report to the probation officer as directed. Such reporting requirements may be fulfilled through remote reporting if approved by the relevant probation officer, the relevant county probation authority or entity, or the Department of Corrections and if the court has not excluded the possibility of remote reporting by the defendant in his or her order of probation. If the Department of Corrections or a county probation authority or entity elects to authorize remote reporting, it must adopt and make available remote probation reporting policies.

(b) Permit the probation officer to visit him or her at his or her home or elsewhere.

(d) Remain within a specified place.

(e) Live without violating any law. A conviction in a court of law is not necessary for such a violation of law to constitute a violation of probation, community control, or any other form of court-ordered supervision.

(f) Make reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by his or her offense in an amount to be determined by the court. The court shall make such reparation or restitution a condition of probation, unless it determines that clear and compelling reasons exist to the contrary. If the court does not order restitution, or orders restitution of only a portion of the damages, as provided in s. 775.089, it shall state on the record in detail the reasons therefor.

(g) Effective July 1, 1994, and applicable for offenses committed on or after that date, make payment of the debt due and owing to a county or municipal detention facility under s. 951.032 for medical care, treatment, hospitalization, or transportation received by the felony probationer while in that detention facility. The court, in determining whether to order such repayment and the amount of the repayment, shall consider the amount of the debt, whether there was any fault of the institution for the medical expenses incurred, the financial resources of the felony probationer, the present and potential future financial needs and earning ability of the probationer, and dependents, and other appropriate factors.

(h) Support his or her legal dependents to the best of his or her ability.

(i) Make payment of the debt due and owing to the state under s. 960.17, subject to modification based on change of circumstances.

(j) Pay any application fee assessed under s. 27.52(1)(b) and attorney’s fees and costs assessed under s. 938.29, subject to modification based on change of circumstances.

(k) Not associate with persons engaged in criminal activities.

(l)1. Submit to random testing as directed by the probation officer or the professional staff of the treatment center where he or she is receiving treatment to determine the presence or use of alcohol or controlled substances.

2. If the offense was a controlled substance violation and the period of probation immediately follows a period of incarceration in the state correctional system, the conditions must include a requirement that the offender submit to random substance abuse testing intermittently throughout the term of supervision, upon the direction of the probation officer.

(m) Be prohibited from possessing, carrying, or owning any:

1. Firearm.

2. Weapon without first procuring the consent of the probation officer.

(n) Be prohibited from using intoxicants to excess or possessing any drugs or narcotics unless prescribed by a physician, an advanced practice registered nurse, or a physician assistant. The probationer or community controllee may not knowingly visit places where intoxicants, drugs, or other dangerous substances are unlawfully sold, dispensed, or used.

(o) Submit to the drawing of blood or other biological specimens as prescribed in ss. 943.325 and 948.014, and reimburse the appropriate agency for the costs of drawing and transmitting the blood or other biological specimens to the Department of Law Enforcement.

(p) Submit to the taking of a digitized photograph by the department as a part of the offender’s records. This photograph may be displayed on the department’s public website while the offender is under court-ordered supervision. However, the department may not display the photograph on the website if the offender is only on pretrial intervention supervision or if the offender’s identity is exempt from disclosure due to an exemption from the requirements of s. 119.07.

(2) The enumeration of specific kinds of terms and conditions does not prevent the court from adding thereto such other or others as it considers proper. However, the sentencing court may only impose a condition of supervision allowing an offender convicted of s. 794.011, s. 800.04, s. 827.071, s. 847.0135(5), or s. 847.0145 to reside in another state if the order stipulates that it is contingent upon the approval of the receiving state interstate compact authority. The court may rescind or modify at any time the terms and conditions theretofore imposed by it upon the probationer. However, if the court withholds adjudication of guilt or imposes a period of incarceration as a condition of probation, the period may not exceed 364 days, and incarceration shall be restricted to either a county facility, or a probation and restitution center under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections.

History.—s. 23, ch. 20519, 1941; s. 5, ch. 77-452; s. 1, ch. 81-198; s. 3, ch. 83-75; s. 16, ch. 83-131; s. 192, ch. 83-216; s. 3, ch. 83-256; s. 8, ch. 84-363; s. 15, ch. 85-288; s. 5, ch. 87-211; s. 11, ch. 88-96; ss. 70, 71, ch. 88-122; s. 37, ch. 89-526; s. 10, ch. 90-287; ss. 8, 17, ch. 90-337; s. 11, ch. 91-225; s. 4, ch. 91-280; s. 23, ch. 92-310; s. 10, ch. 93-37; s. 15, ch. 93-227; s. 1, ch. 94-294; s. 1, ch. 95-189; ss. 53, 59, ch. 95-283; s. 1, ch. 96-170; s. 4, ch. 96-232; s. 54, ch. 96-312; s. 6, ch. 96-409; s. 22, ch. 97-78; s. 1877, ch. 97-102; s. 11, ch. 97-107; s. 27, ch. 97-234; s. 44, ch. 97-271; s. 3, ch. 97-308; s. 14, ch. 98-81; s. 15, ch. 98-251; s. 122, ch. 99-3; s. 13, ch. 99-201; s. 3, ch. 2000-246; s. 6, ch. 2001-50; s. 1045, ch. 2002-387; s. 1, ch. 2003-18; s. 1, ch. 2003-63; s. 136, ch. 2003-402; ss. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, ch. 2004-373; s. 116, ch. 2006-1; s. 28, ch. 2008-172; s. 18, ch. 2010-64; s. 19, ch. 2016-224; s. 5, ch. 2017-115; s. 86, ch. 2018-106; s. 97, ch. 2018-110; s. 2, ch. 2022-166.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 414 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1952–2026 · leading case: Kasischke v. State, 991 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kasischke v. State, 991 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 2008). · cites it 104× “; requiring a curfew between specified hours; providing alternatives; revising requirements for treatment for sex offenders; revising a provision that prohibits a sex offender from viewing, owning or possessing certain materials; prohibiting a sex offender from possessing…”

Victor Villanueva v. State of Florida, 200 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2016). · cites it 29× “Because I conclude that the trial court acted within the broad discretion provided by section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2011), for trial courts to impose conditions of probation, I would approve the decision of the Third District on review.”

Woodson v. State, 864 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). · cites it 14× “[2] The record contains an exhibit, signed by Woodson, specifically listing these conditions and all of the sex offender conditions required under section 948.03. This exhibit also contains a signature, apparently affixed by a clerk or other court personnel, indicating that…”

State v. Jones, 327 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1976). · cites it 10× “Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1973), prescribes the terms and conditions of probation and specifically authorizes the trial court to add such other conditions as it considers proper.”

Fresneda v. State, 347 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 1977). · cites it 10× “" In disposing of the motion to correct illegal sentence, the trial court passed on the constitutionality of Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975). Accordingly, we have jurisdiction.”

Del Valle v. State, 80 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2011). · cites it 8× “The court is also required to make payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2011). That section, entitled "Terms and conditions of probation," states that the trial court "shall" make "restitution a condition of…”

Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). · cites it 6× “Reyes' written probation order because that condition is statutorily mandated, § 948.03(1)(i), Fla. Stat. (1991), and is reasonably related to his rehabilitation.”

Bentley v. State, 411 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). · cites it 10× “Section 948.03, Florida Statutes, does not require that the trial judge specify his reasons for imposing conditions of probation, but a cautious trial judge may see fit to do so in the event an appellate court undertakes to review for substance and reasonableness.”

Villery v. Florida Parole & Prob. Com'n, 396 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 1981). · cites it 4× “Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1979), lists the terms and conditions of probation which may be imposed on a defendant.”

Lippman v. State, 633 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1994). · cites it 6× “Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1987), confers broad authority on the trial court to "determine the terms and conditions of probation.”

Nank v. State, 646 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). · cites it 6× “, § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (1991). [4] The court also noted in Biller, however, that the requirements of Rodriquez are not applicable to the "many general conditions imposed upon most, if not all, probationers which are broadly directed toward supervision and rehabilitation.”

Kiriazes v. State, 798 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). · cites it 9× “Although oral pronouncement of the probation conditions specified by section 948.03(5) [1] for sex offenders is not required, in the instant case the conditions were neither imposed orally at sentencing nor in the written order of probation.”

Show all 414 citing cases →

— 948.03(1) — 52 cases

Victor Villanueva v. State of Florida, 200 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2016). “Because I conclude that the trial court acted within the broad discretion provided by section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2011), for trial courts to impose conditions of probation, I would approve the decision of the Third District on review.”

Villery v. Florida Parole & Prob. Com'n, 396 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 1981). “Section 948.03(1), Florida Statutes (1979), lists the terms and conditions of probation which may be imposed on a defendant.”

Bentley v. State, 411 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). “Section 948.03, Florida Statutes, does not require that the trial judge specify his reasons for imposing conditions of probation, but a cautious trial judge may see fit to do so in the event an appellate court undertakes to review for substance and reasonableness.”

Jones v. State, 876 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

State v. Green, 667 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

— 948.03(1)(Z) — 1 case

Williams v. State, 681 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

— 948.03(1)(a) — 6 cases

Davis v. State, 474 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

State v. Nazario, 100 So. 3d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Vasquez v. State, 663 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Fernandez v. State, 677 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Jackson v. State, 902 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

— 948.03(1)(a)(m) — 1 case

Russman v. State, 869 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

— 948.03(1)(b) — 5 cases

State v. Yule, 905 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005).

State v. Springer, 965 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Jesse Cleveland Harrell v. State of Florida, 162 So. 3d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Brown v. State, 697 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Soca v. State, 656 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

— 948.03(1)(c) — 10 cases

Watkins v. State, 368 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Vezina v. State, 644 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).

Burke v. State, 642 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

State v. Green, 667 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Washington v. State, 685 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

— 948.03(1)(e) — 31 cases

State v. Hawthorne, 573 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1991).

Kirby v. State, 863 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2003).

Grice v. State, 528 So. 2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Spivey v. State, 531 So. 2d 965 (Fla. 1988).

Chatman v. State, 365 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

— 948.03(1)(f) — 4 cases

Del Valle v. State, 80 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 2011). “The court is also required to make payment of restitution a condition of probation in accordance with section 948.03, Florida Statutes (2011). That section, entitled "Terms and conditions of probation," states that the trial court "shall" make "restitution a condition of…”

Kirkland v. State, 666 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

Ward v. State, 511 So. 2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Jean Claude Noel v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2024).

— 948.03(1)(g) — 14 cases

Fresneda v. State, 347 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 1977). “" In disposing of the motion to correct illegal sentence, the trial court passed on the constitutionality of Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1975). Accordingly, we have jurisdiction.”

Ballance v. State, 447 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Bass v. State, 473 So. 2d 1367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

DiOrio v. State, 359 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Barlow v. State, 388 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

— 948.03(1)(i) — 10 cases

Reyes v. State, 655 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). “Reyes' written probation order because that condition is statutorily mandated, § 948.03(1)(i), Fla. Stat. (1991), and is reasonably related to his rehabilitation.”

Nank v. State, 646 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). “, § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (1991). [4] The court also noted in Biller, however, that the requirements of Rodriquez are not applicable to the "many general conditions imposed upon most, if not all, probationers which are broadly directed toward supervision and rehabilitation.”

Tomlinson v. State, 645 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Emond v. State, 652 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Zeigler v. State, 647 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

— 948.03(1)(j) — 23 cases

Hayes v. State, 585 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Luby v. State, 648 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Tillman v. State, 592 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Brock v. State, 688 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 1997).

— 948.03(1)(j)(1) — 1 case

Vasquez v. State, 663 So. 2d 1343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

— 948.03(1)(k) — 10 cases

Fernandez v. State, 677 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Gilchrist v. State, 674 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Jackson v. State, 685 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Brock v. State, 688 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 1997).

McDaniels v. State, 679 So. 2d 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

— 948.03(1)(k)(1) — 4 cases

Brock v. State, 667 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

Jones v. State, 846 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Lunn v. State, 675 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Frey v. State, 679 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

— 948.03(1)(l) — 3 cases

Mark Metellus v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Mark Metellus v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

Roberdd Douchard v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

— 948.03(1)(m) — 4 cases

Johnson v. State, 701 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Jeremy Livingstone v. State of Florida, 268 So. 3d 252 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019).

Roberdd Douchard v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

Ryan Lee Scheurman v. State of Florida (Fla. 5th DCA 2025).

— 948.03(1)(n) — 4 cases

McRae v. State, 679 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

Roberdd Douchard v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2023).

Sherri Lavictoire Marquis v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2022).

Catherine Capozzi v. the State of Florida (Fla. 3d DCA 2025).

— 948.03(1)(o) — 2 cases

Mark Metellus v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Mark Metellus v. State of Florida (Fla. 4th DCA 2021).

— 948.03(10) — 1 case

Taylor v. State, 821 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

— 948.03(10)(m) — 1 case

Nelson v. State, 669 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

— 948.03(2) — 35 cases

Kasischke v. State, 991 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 2008). “; requiring a curfew between specified hours; providing alternatives; revising requirements for treatment for sex offenders; revising a provision that prohibits a sex offender from viewing, owning or possessing certain materials; prohibiting a sex offender from possessing…”

Lewis v. State, 402 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

— 948.03(2)(a)(4) — 1 case

Brooks v. State, 649 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

— 948.03(2)(b) — 1 case

Alexander v. State, 602 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

— 948.03(2)(c) — 1 case

Davis v. State, 461 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

— 948.03(3) — 8 cases

Chaney v. State, 452 So. 2d 1148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Myers v. State, 426 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

Florida Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Gross, 421 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Purvis v. State, 442 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Young v. State, 438 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

— 948.03(3)(a)(1) — 1 case

Anthony v. State, 854 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

— 948.03(4) — 10 cases

Harris v. State, 879 So. 2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

State v. Torres, 890 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Smith v. State, 484 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1986).

Goldschmitt v. State, 490 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Williams v. State, 879 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

— 948.03(5) — 47 cases

Woodson v. State, 864 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). “[2] The record contains an exhibit, signed by Woodson, specifically listing these conditions and all of the sex offender conditions required under section 948.03. This exhibit also contains a signature, apparently affixed by a clerk or other court personnel, indicating that…”

Kiriazes v. State, 798 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). “Although oral pronouncement of the probation conditions specified by section 948.03(5) [1] for sex offenders is not required, in the instant case the conditions were neither imposed orally at sentencing nor in the written order of probation.”

Perez v. State, 805 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

— 948.03(5)(a) — 23 cases

Dep't of Corr. v. Grubbs, 884 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

Bauer v. State, 96 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

— 948.03(5)(a)(10) — 1 case

Johnston v. State, 768 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

— 948.03(5)(a)(3) — 2 cases

Adams v. State, 979 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 2008).

Woodson v. State, 889 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 2004).

— 948.03(5)(a)(5) — 2 cases

Wesner v. State, 843 So. 2d 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

Enea v. State, 171 So. 3d 219 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

— 948.03(5)(a)(6) — 1 case

Hicks v. State, 890 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

— 948.03(5)(a)(7) — 7 cases

Kasischke v. State, 946 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

Sellers v. State, 16 So. 3d 225 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009).

Ertley v. State, 785 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Taylor v. State, 821 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

— 948.03(5)(a)(b) — 1 case

Boutwell v. State, 776 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

— 948.03(5)(b) — 8 cases

Kline v. State, 509 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

Lane v. State, 762 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

C.C.M. v. State, 782 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

— 948.03(5)(b)(5) — 1 case

Witchard v. State, 68 So. 3d 407 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

— 948.03(5)(g) — 1 case

— 948.03(6) — 20 cases

Rowland v. State, 548 So. 2d 812 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).

State v. Springer, 965 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007).

Singleton v. State, 582 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Gearhart v. State, 885 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

— 948.03(7) — 18 cases

Clinger v. State, 533 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

Lippman v. State, 633 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1994). “Section 948.03, Florida Statutes (1987), confers broad authority on the trial court to "determine the terms and conditions of probation.”

Clark v. State, 579 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 1991).

Delancey v. State, 653 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

Jordan v. State, 610 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

— 948.03(7)(a) — 1 case

Gatlin v. State, 741 So. 2d 1230 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).

— 948.03(7)(c) — 1 case

Nelson v. State, 669 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

— 948.03(8) — 6 cases

Gladfelter v. State, 618 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 1993).

Small v. State, 587 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Williams v. State, 565 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

Rosa v. State, 592 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Smith v. State, 573 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

— 948.03(j) — 1 case

Wilson v. State, 857 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

— 948.03(k) — 1 case

Torres v. State, 712 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

— 948.03(l) — 1 case

Spry v. State, 750 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

— 948.03(l)(a) — 3 cases

State v. Coleman, 44 So. 3d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Gaal v. State, 599 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Davis v. State, 36 So. 3d 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

— 948.03(l)(b) — 2 cases

Jesse Cleveland Harrell v. State of Florida, 162 So. 3d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Newton v. State, 31 So. 3d 892 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

— 948.03(l)(c) — 5 cases

Pulecio v. State, 160 So. 3d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).

Washington v. State, 685 So. 2d 858 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Hawkins v. State, 693 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Weekfall v. State, 686 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Woodruff v. State, 656 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

— 948.03(l)(e) — 9 cases

Thomas v. State, 480 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

K.M.C. v. State, 485 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

State v. Ford, 27 So. 3d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Pardes v. State, 696 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Waller v. State, 550 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

— 948.03(l)(f) — 3 cases

Villanueva v. State, 118 So. 3d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

Vernon v. State, 618 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

— 948.03(l)(g) — 4 cases

J.S.H. v. State, 455 So. 2d 1143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

Jones v. State, 427 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Stokes v. State, 377 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Maples v. State, 397 So. 2d 1146 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

— 948.03(l)(h) — 1 case

Martin v. State, 679 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

— 948.03(l)(i) — 7 cases

Justin Randolph Demott v. State of Florida, 194 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2016).

Waters v. State, 520 So. 2d 678 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

Heathcoe v. State, 654 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Dexter v. State, 654 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Johnson v. State, 662 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

— 948.03(l)(j) — 5 cases

Swinton v. State, 670 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Holmes v. State, 675 So. 2d 995 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Shell v. State, 672 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Forsythe v. State, 597 So. 2d 423 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).

Joly v. State, 702 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

— 948.03(l)(k) — 8 cases

Justin Randolph Demott v. State of Florida, 194 So. 3d 335 (Fla. 2016).

Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000).

Sanford v. State, 684 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Pardes v. State, 696 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Demott v. State, 160 So. 3d 520 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).

— 948.03(l)(k)(l) — 1 case

Phillips v. State, 971 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

— 948.03(l)(m) — 2 cases

Knite v. State, 102 So. 3d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Phillips v. State, 971 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008).

— 948.03(l)(o) — 1 case

Burch v. State, 823 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

— 948.03(n) — 1 case

O'connell v. State, 733 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.