948.037
Education and learning as a condition of probation or community control.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
948.037 Education and learning as a condition of probation or community control.—
(1) As a condition of community control, probation, or probation following incarceration, the court may require an offender who has not obtained a high school diploma or high school equivalency diploma or who lacks basic or functional literacy skills, upon acceptance by an adult education program, to make a good faith effort toward completion of such basic or functional literacy skills or high school equivalency diploma, as defined in s. 1003.435, in accordance with the assessed adult general education needs of the individual offender. The court may not revoke community control, probation, or probation following incarceration because of the offender’s inability to achieve such skills or diploma but may revoke community control, probation, or probation following incarceration if the offender fails to make a good faith effort to achieve such skills or diploma. The court may grant early termination of community control, probation, or probation following incarceration upon the offender’s successful completion of the approved program. As used in this subsection, “good faith effort” means the offender is enrolled in a program of instruction and is attending and making satisfactory progress toward completion of the requirements.
(2) A juvenile on community control who is a public school student must attend a public adult education program or a dropout prevention program, pursuant to s. 1003.53, which includes a second chance school or an alternative to expulsion, if the school district where the juvenile is enrolled offers such programs, unless the principal of the school determines that special circumstances warrant continuation in the regular educational school program.
(3) If a juvenile on community control attends a regular educational school program because a public adult education program or dropout prevention program, which includes a second chance school or an alternative to expulsion, is not available in the school district, the identity of the juvenile on community control, the nature of the felony offense committed by the juvenile, and the conditions of community control must be made known to each of the student’s teachers.
History.—s. 23, ch. 92-310; s. 27, ch. 97-234; s. 1045, ch. 2002-387; s. 22, ch. 2004-373; s. 8, ch. 2017-115.
Note.—Former s. 948.03(9).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2016–2025 · leading case: Zavon Deshawn Taylor v. State of Florida
Zavon Deshawn Taylor v. State of Florida (2016)
“We remand for the court to modify this condition to conform to the requirements of section 948.037(1), Florida Statutes (2012), which would require Taylor to make a “good faith effort” to achieve such.”
Silas v. State (2017)
“We remand for the court to modify this condition to conform to the requirements of section 948.037(1), Florida Statutes (2014), which would require Silas to make a “good faith effort” to achieve such skills or diploma.”
Carissa Parker v. State of Florida (2024)
“See § 948.037(1), Fla. Stat.; Taylor v. State, 185 So.”
Carissa Parker v. State of Florida (2025)
“See § 948.037(1), Fla. Stat.; Taylor v. State, 185 So.”
— 948.037(1) — 4 cases
Zavon Deshawn Taylor v. State of Florida (2016)
“We remand for the court to modify this condition to conform to the requirements of section 948.037(1), Florida Statutes (2012), which would require Taylor to make a “good faith effort” to achieve such.”
Silas v. State (2017)
“We remand for the court to modify this condition to conform to the requirements of section 948.037(1), Florida Statutes (2014), which would require Silas to make a “good faith effort” to achieve such skills or diploma.”
Carissa Parker v. State of Florida (2024)
“See § 948.037(1), Fla. Stat.; Taylor v. State, 185 So.”
Carissa Parker v. State of Florida (2025)
“See § 948.037(1), Fla. Stat.; Taylor v. State, 185 So.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.