Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 948.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 948.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 948.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS
Chapter 948
PROBATION AND COMMUNITY CONTROL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 948.10
948.10 Community control programs; home confinement.
(1) The Department of Corrections shall develop and administer a community control program. This program shall be rigidly structured and designed to accommodate offenders who, in the absence of such a program, would have been incarcerated in a jail or prison. The program shall focus on the provision of home confinement subject to an authorized level of limited freedom and special conditions that are commensurate with the seriousness of the crime. The program shall offer the courts and the Florida Commission on Offender Review an alternative, community-based method to punish an offender in lieu of incarceration and shall provide intensive supervision to closely monitor compliance with restrictions and special conditions, including, but not limited to, treatment or rehabilitative programs. The targeted population for this community control program includes:
(a) Probation violators charged with technical violations or new violations of law.
(b) Parole or conditional release violators charged with technical violations or new violations of law.
(c) Individuals found guilty of felonies who, due to their criminal backgrounds or the seriousness of the offenses, would not be placed on regular probation.
(2) Caseloads should be restricted to a maximum of 30 cases per officer in order to ensure an adequate level of staffing. Community control is an individualized program in which the offender is restricted to a residential treatment facility or a nursing facility or restricted to his or her approved residence subject to an authorized level of limited freedom.
(3) Procedures governing violations of community control are the same as those described in s. 948.06 with respect to probation.
(4) Upon completion of the sanctions imposed and before the expiration of the community control term ordered by the court, the department may petition the court to terminate early the supervision of the offender from community control supervision or to return the offender to a program of regular probation supervision for the remainder of the term. In considering the petition, the court should recognize the limited staff resources committed to the community control program, the purpose of the program, and the offender’s successful compliance with the conditions set forth in the order of the court.
History.ss. 12, 13, 21, ch. 83-131; s. 77, ch. 85-62; s. 4, ch. 87-211; ss. 62, 69, ch. 88-122; s. 18, ch. 90-337; s. 15, ch. 91-225; ss. 1, 16, ch. 91-280; s. 14, ch. 93-227; s. 1690, ch. 97-102; s. 6, ch. 97-239; s. 6, ch. 2001-209; s. 3, ch. 2003-142; ss. 3, 6, 7, 30, ch. 2004-373; s. 7, ch. 2007-2; s. 6, ch. 2008-250; s. 51, ch. 2014-191; s. 11, ch. 2017-115; s. 136, ch. 2019-167.
Note.Subsection (2) former s. 948.01(10); subsection (9) former s. 948.01(9); subsection (10) former s. 948.01(5).

F.S. 948.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 948.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 948.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 948.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 948.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PEARSON, v. M. HODGSON,, 363 F. Supp. 3d 197 (D. Mass. 2018)

. . . Regs § 948.10 -and not Securus's collection of the telephone fees that it does not pass back to the Sheriff . . . Regs. § 948.10, and the contract with Securus-including the requirement that Securus make commission . . .

WOODS, v. STATE, 214 So. 3d 803 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . .); § 948.10, Fla. . . .

IN RE ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES INC., 544 B.R. 848 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2016)

. . . . § 948.10. . . . .

COAL RIVER MOUNTAIN WATCH, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, 146 F. Supp. 3d 17 (D.D.C. 2015)

. . . . § 948.10. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 176 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 2015)

. . . .] § 948.10(10), Fla. Stat. . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES- REPORT NO., 131 So. 3d 720 (Fla. 2013)

. . . . § 948.10(1), Fla. Stat. . . .

WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INCORPORATED v. C. HUFFMAN,, 625 F.3d 159 (4th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 948.10. . . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. POWELLTON COAL COMPANY, LLC,, 662 F. Supp. 2d 514 (S.D.W. Va. 2009)

. . . . § 948.10, and its surface mining program is administered by the WVDEP. . . .

WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INC. v. HUFFMAN,, 588 F. Supp. 2d 678 (N.D.W. Va. 2009)

. . . Parts 948.10 and 948.15; W. Va. Code § 22-3-1, et seq. . . .

OHIO RIVER VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, INCORPORATED v. GREEN VALLEY COAL COMPANY, C. O. R. A., 511 F.3d 407 (4th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 948.10. . . .

OHIO RIVER VALLEY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, INCORPORATED v. KEMPTHORNE,, 473 F.3d 94 (4th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 948.10 (2006). . We note that the D.C. . . .

SPEENER, v. MAPLES,, 150 F. App'x 541 (7th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 948.10. . . .

ELLIS, v. STATE, 816 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 948.10(13), Fla.Statute (2001). . . .

BRAGG W. R. v. WEST VIRGINIA COAL ASSOCIATION U. S. N. U. S. D. U. S. C. AEI W. R. v. U. S. N. U. S. D. U. S. C. AEI W. R. v. C. U. S. N. U. S. D. U. S. AEI W. R. v. U. S. N. U. S. D. U. S. C. AEI W. R. v. U. S. N. U. S. D. U. S. C. AEI W. R. v. U. S. N. U. S. D. U. S. C. AEI W. R. v. v. C. U. S. N. U. S. D. U. S. AEI W. R. v. v. C. U. S. N. U. S. D. U. S. AEI, 248 F.3d 275 (4th Cir. 2001)

. . . . § 948.10 (noting the Secretary’s approval of West Virginia’s plan). . . . See 30 U.S.C. § 1253(a); 30 C.F.R. § 948.10. . . .

THE WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, v. A. NORTON, O., 137 F. Supp. 2d 687 (S.D.W. Va. 2001)

. . . . § 948.10. . . .

WEST VIRGINIA MINING AND RECLAMATION ASSOCIATION, v. BABBITT,, 970 F. Supp. 506 (S.D.W. Va. 1997)

. . . . § 948.10. . . .

TROTTER, v. STATE, 690 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1996)

. . . the plain meaning of "imprisonment,” a term that speaks for itself, our prior opinion cited section 948.10 . . . Subsection 948.10(1), Florida statutes (1985), provides that community control is “an alternative, community-based . . .

MARTIN, v. STATE, 618 So. 2d 737 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . to imprisonment, the court may place the offender in a community control program as provided in s. 948.10 . . .

TROTTER, v. STATE, 576 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Subsection 948.10(1), Florida Statutes (1985), provides that community control is “an alternative, community-based . . .

In MILLS, SHAVER MOTORS, INC. v. MILLS,, 111 B.R. 186 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1988)

. . . (Clause 13) The lease was for a 36 month term ending November 2, 1985 with monthly installments of $948.10 . . .

DIETZ, v. STATE, 534 So. 2d 808 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 948.10, Fla. Stat. (1985). . . .

MITCHELL, v. STATE, 463 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 948.10(1) states that community control “shall offer the courts and the Parole and Probation . . .

WILLIAMS, v. STATE, 464 So. 2d 1218 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . Chapter 83-131, Section 2; see also Section 948.10(1), Florida Statutes (1983). . . .

LOUZON, v. STATE, 460 So. 2d 551 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See §§ 948.10(1), 948.001(1), Florida Statutes (1983); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701d.l3 and committee note (d) . . .

D. BOBLIT, v. WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY,, 350 F. Supp. 768 (D. Md. 1972)

. . . Denno, 347 U.S. 556, 558, 74 S.Ct. 716, 98 L.Ed. 948.10 10. See also Fikes v. . . .

V. H. v., 45 T.C. 15 (T.C. 1965)

. . . indebted to Monette for such loans in amounts as follows: Incorporated $12, 753. 64 East Export— 4, 948.10 . . .

ALLEN v. MILLER HYDRO CO., 181 F.2d 759 (5th Cir. 1950)

. . . the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia involves excess profits tax of $948.10 . . .