Florida Statute 960.292 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 960
VICTIM ASSISTANCE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 960.292

960.292 Enforcement of the civil restitution lien through civil restitution lien order.—The civil restitution lien shall be made enforceable by means of a civil restitution lien order.

(1) Upon conviction, the convicted offender shall incur civil liability for damages and losses to crime victims, the state, its local subdivisions, and aggrieved parties as set forth in s. 960.293. The conviction shall estop the convicted offender from denying the essential allegations of that offense in any subsequent proceedings.

(2) Upon motion by the state, upon petition of the local subdivision, crime victim, or aggrieved party, or on its own motion, the court in which the convicted offender is convicted shall enter civil restitution lien orders in favor of crime victims, the state, its local subdivisions, and other aggrieved parties. The court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over the convicted offender for the sole purpose of entering civil restitution lien orders for the duration of the sentence and up to 5 years from release from incarceration or supervision, whichever occurs later.

(3) The court shall enter separate civil restitution lien orders as appropriate in favor of the crime victims, the state, its local subdivisions, or aggrieved parties. The civil restitution lien order shall include the name of the convicted offender, the case number assigned to the applicable criminal case, and the names and social security numbers of the crime victim, state, its local subdivisions, or aggrieved parties, as appropriate.

History.—s. 4, ch. 94-342; s. 31, ch. 95-184; s. 15, ch. 2009-63.

F.S. 960.292 on Google Scholar

F.S. 960.292 on CourtListener

Amendments to 960.292

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 960.292

Total Results: 37

Wilson v. State

957 So. 2d 683, 2007 WL 1295736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2007 | Docket: 1270856

Cited 5 times | Published

with Wilson's interpretation of the statute. Section 960.292 details the procedure for imposing a civil

Rosero v. State

668 So. 2d 1114, 1996 WL 93923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1996 | Docket: 1686896

Cited 5 times | Published

at 451, 109 S.Ct. at 1903. Although under section 960.292(2), the criminal trial court retains jurisdiction

Bunch v. State

745 So. 2d 400, 1999 WL 960792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 1999 | Docket: 1689254

Cited 4 times | Published

enter a civil restitution lien pursuant to section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (1997). During the hearing

Rodriguez v. State

899 So. 2d 471, 2005 WL 826932

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 11, 2005 | Docket: 756153

Cited 3 times | Published

monitoring any Parole Commission release order. Section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (2004) provides that the

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

27 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 255984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2010 | Docket: 1664367

Cited 2 times | Published

enforceable by means of a civil restitution hen order.” § 960.292, Fla. Stat. The sentencing court has the authority

Ridley v. State

890 So. 2d 1261, 2005 WL 119465

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2005 | Docket: 1690279

Cited 2 times | Published

precluded from pursuing restitution pursuant to section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (2002), which provides

State v. Sandomeno

217 So. 3d 110, 2017 WL 1403616, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5362

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2017 | Docket: 60265625

Cited 1 times | Published

entry of a civil restitution lien pursuant to section 960.292, Florida Statutes (2015). Because restitution

Nickerson v. State

178 So. 3d 538, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16472, 2015 WL 6739003

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2015 | Docket: 3009675

Cited 1 times | Published

civil restitution lien orders pursuant to section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (2014), Because the trial

Kleintank v. State

178 So. 3d 15, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14654, 2015 WL 5737060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 2015 | Docket: 60251387

Cited 1 times | Published

The State properly concedes that pursuant to section 960.292, Florida Statutes (2014), the proper remedy

Palomares v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2025 | Docket: 70807599

Published

his or her incarceration upon conviction. See § 960.292(1) ("Upon conviction, the convicted offender

Florida Department of Corrections v. Jermaine D. Jones

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2025 | Docket: 69942880

Published

misreading of section 960.292, Florida Statutes (2022), we reverse. Section 960.292 provides in

Michael Grimace v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2025 | Docket: 69833929

Published

MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 960.292(2), Fla. Stat. (1999) (“Upon motion by the state

Florida Department of Corrections v. O'Neal

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455320

Published

960.293." § 960.292(1). In order to recover those damages and losses, section 960.292(2) provides that

Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections v. Angel Luis Montero W

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2024 | Docket: 69455585

Published

offender.” § 960.29(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (2024). Section 960.292(1), Florida Statutes (2024), provides that

Florida Department of Corrections v. Ivan De La Paz

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2024 | Docket: 68798702

Published

must be imposed at the time of sentencing. Section 960.292(1), Florida Statutes (2022), provides: “Upon

ASLEYS ACOSTA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 19, 2024 | Docket: 67324133

Published

960.292(1), 960.293(2)). To that end, section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (2019), grants the court

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. JULIANNE M. HOLT, PUBLIC DEFENDER OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68034631

Published

or supervision, whichever occurs later." § 960.292(2); Wilson v. State, 957 So. 2d 683, 685 (Fla

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS v. JULIANNE M. HOLT, PUBLIC DEFENDER OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT AND HONORABLE SAMANTHA LEE WARD

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68034631

Published

or supervision, whichever occurs later." § 960.292(2); Wilson v. State, 957 So. 2d 683, 685 (Fla

Andrew J. Curtis v. State of Florida

187 So. 3d 947, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4532, 2016 WL 1133743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 2016 | Docket: 3046953

Published

lien, the trial court properly entered it. Section 960.292(1), Florida Statutes, provides in part that

Harris v. State

157 So. 3d 345, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 477, 2015 WL 196301

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 16, 2015 | Docket: 60246057

Published

126 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); § 960.29(l)(a), Fla. Stat.; 960.292(2), Fla. Stat. . We have previously held

Barreto v. State

936 So. 2d 1215, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14961, 2006 WL 2570618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 2006 | Docket: 64846461

Published

PER CURIAM. Pursuant to section 960.292, Florida Statutes (2005), the trial court was authorized to

Lawson v. State

935 So. 2d 645, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14012, 2006 WL 2422525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2006 | Docket: 64846126

Published

victim to pursue a civil restitution lien under section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (2004). See Ridley, 890

Richard M. Rinaldo v. G. Corbett

256 F.3d 1276, 50 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 636, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15707

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 13, 2001 | Docket: 396927

Published

damage amount of $250,000.” Under Fla. Stat. § 960.292(2), "... upon petition of the local subdivision

Richard M. Rinaldo v. G. Corbett

256 F.3d 1276

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 13, 2001 | Docket: 396925

Published

damage amount of $250,000." Under Fla. Stat. § 960.292(2), " . . . upon petition of the local subdivision

Moriarity v. State

751 So. 2d 1286, 2000 WL 282782

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 2000 | Docket: 64795389

Published

while an appeal of the judgment is pending. Section 960.292, Florida Statutes (1999), seems to contemplate

Alberts v. State

711 So. 2d 635, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5902, 1998 WL 264780

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 1998 | Docket: 64781153

Published

the affidavit in Case No. 89-02482. Further, section 960.292(2), Florida Statutes (1995), upon which the

Coradi v. State

670 So. 2d 1112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3067, 1996 WL 135511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1996 | Docket: 64763500

Published

order is entered imposing the lien pursuant to section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). See *1113Snyder

Whiddon v. State

664 So. 2d 340, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12757, 1995 WL 737193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1995 | Docket: 64760640

Published

its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Barker v. State

664 So. 2d 340, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12756, 1995 WL 737196

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1995 | Docket: 64760641

Published

its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(8), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Windham v. State

664 So. 2d 334, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12761, 1995 WL 735469

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1995 | Docket: 64760639

Published

its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Taylor v. State

664 So. 2d 1133, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12759, 1995 WL 735471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1995 | Docket: 64760969

Published

its noncomphance with the requirements of section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Keyes v. State

664 So. 2d 1132, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12760, 1995 WL 735470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1995 | Docket: 64760968

Published

its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Roberts v. State

664 So. 2d 1133, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12758, 1995 WL 735473

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1995 | Docket: 64760970

Published

its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Hill v. State

664 So. 2d 327, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12683, 1995 WL 729909

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1995 | Docket: 64760636

Published

its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(B), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Antonik v. State

664 So. 2d 328, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12682, 1995 WL 729916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1995 | Docket: 64760637

Published

its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Johnson v. State

664 So. 2d 1105, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12684, 1995 WL 729904

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1995 | Docket: 64760963

Published

its noneompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the

Snyder v. State

664 So. 2d 1073, 1995 WL 704982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1995 | Docket: 2564871

Published

restitution under the Act, as is required by section 960.292(3).[1] We agree with the appellant's second