Florida Statute 984.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title XLVII
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND CORRECTIONS

Chapter 984
CHILDREN AND FAMILIES IN NEED OF SERVICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 984.12

984.12 Case staffing; services and treatment to a family in need of services.—

(1) The appropriate representative of the department shall request a meeting of the family and child with a case staffing committee to review the case of any family or child who the department determines is in need of services or treatment if:

(a) The family or child is not in agreement with the services or treatment offered;

(b) The family or child will not participate in the services or treatment selected; or

(c) The representative of the department needs assistance in developing an appropriate plan for services. The time and place selected for the meeting shall be convenient for the child and family.

(2) The composition of the case staffing committee shall be based on the needs of the family and child. It shall include a representative from the child’s school district and a representative of the Department of Juvenile Justice, and may include a supervisor of the department’s contracted provider; a representative from the area of health, mental health, substance abuse, social, or educational services; a representative of the state attorney; the alternative sanctions coordinator; and any person recommended by the child, family, or department.

(3) The case staffing committee shall reach a timely decision to provide the child or family with needed services and treatment through the development of a plan for services.

(4) The plan for services shall contain the following:

(a) Statement of the problems.

(b) Needs of the child.

(d) Measurable objectives that address the identified problems and needs.

(e) Services and treatment to be provided, to include:

1. Type of services or treatment.

2. Frequency of services or treatment.

3. Location.

4. Accountable service providers or staff.

(f) Timeframes for achieving objectives.

(5) Upon receipt of the plan, the child and family shall acknowledge their position by accepting or rejecting the services and provisions in writing. If the plan is accepted, it shall be implemented as soon as is practicable.

(6) A case manager shall be designated by the case staffing committee to be responsible for implementing the plan. The case manager shall periodically review the progress towards achieving the objectives of the plan in order to:

(a) Advise the case staffing committee of the need to make adjustments to the plan; or

(b) Terminate the case as indicated by successful or substantial achievement of the objectives of the plan.

(7) The parent, guardian, or legal custodian may convene a meeting of the case staffing committee, and any other member of the committee may convene a meeting if the member finds that doing so is in the best interest of the family or child. A case staffing committee meeting requested by a parent, guardian, or legal custodian must be convened within 7 days, excluding weekends and legal holidays, after the date the department’s representative receives the request in writing.

(8) Within 7 days after meeting, the case staffing committee shall provide the parent, guardian, or legal custodian with a written report that details the reasons for the committee’s decision to recommend, or decline to recommend, that the department file a petition alleging that the child is a child in need of services.

History.—s. 8, ch. 87-133; s. 9, ch. 91-45; s. 19, ch. 95-267; s. 9, ch. 95-280; s. 4, ch. 96-369; s. 24, ch. 96-398; s. 98, ch. 97-238; s. 7, ch. 97-281.

Note.—Former s. 39.426.

F.S. 984.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 984.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 984.12

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 984.12

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 984.12.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 984.12

Total Results: 13

CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-02-19T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: “right around” $1,200. The State sought $9,984.12, an amount reached by subtracting the value of …value. The court ordered the defendant to pay $9,984.12, which included the original price, not the fair

CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-10-24T00:53:00-07:00

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure New Rules for Qualified and Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-07-03T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 142 So. 3d 831, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 470, 2014 WL 3555960, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2124

Snippet: Forms Finally, we amend existing forms 12.984 and 12.998 and adopt two new forms. Family Law

Sockwell v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-12-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 123 So. 3d 585, 2012 WL 6720534, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 22150

Snippet: to the case staffing committee under s[ection] 984.12 with a recommendation to file a child-in-need-of-services

In Re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-01-28T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 27 So. 3d 650, 2010 WL 308120

Snippet: legislation, we adopt new rule 12.742 and new forms 12.984 and 12.998.[1] Rule 12.742 implements and complements…12.015 (Family Law Forms) to add new forms 12.984 and 12.998 to the list of Family Law Rule of Procedure

In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1992-09-24T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 606 So. 2d 227

Snippet: States v. Barnett, 376 U.S. 681, 696, 84 S.Ct. 984, 12 L.Ed.2d 23 (1964). In answer to the contention

Florida Bar In re Smith

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1987-12-03T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 515 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 595, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2549, 1987 WL 4306

Snippet: McDonald, Overton, Shaw 3 December 1987 515 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 595, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2549, 1987

James v. Consolidated Inns of Daytona Beach

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-11-12T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 516 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2600, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10981, 1987 WL 1472

Snippet: Dauksch, Upchurch 12 November 1987 516 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2600, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10981

Picciolo v. Jones

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-07-14T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 509 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1715, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9329

Snippet: Barkdull, Hendry, Nesbitt 14 July 1987 509 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1715, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9329

Vogtsberger v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1987-02-16T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 502 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 535, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6730

Snippet: Ervin, Shivers, Zehmer 16 February 1987 502 So. 2d 984, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 535, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6730

Aaron v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1973-07-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 284 So. 2d 673

Snippet: United States v. Barnett, 376 U.S. 681, 84 S.Ct. 984, 12 L.Ed.2d 23 (1964), and imposed *678 on the states

In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1967-02-28T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 196 So. 2d 124

Snippet: United States v. Barnett, 376 U.S. 681, 84 S.Ct. 984, 12 L.Ed.2d 23.) There is little doubt, therefore,

Diebert v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1967-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 199 So. 2d 288, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4854

Snippet: . Barnett, 376 U.S. 681, at page 686, 84 S.Ct. 984, 12 L.Ed.2d 23 (1964), where a show cause order was