Florida/Georgia Personal Injury & Workers Compensation

You're probably overthinking it. Call a lawyer.

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 1002.21 - Full Text and Legal Analysis
Florida Statute 1002.21 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
F.S. 1002.21 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 1002.21

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE
Chapter 1002
STUDENT AND PARENTAL RIGHTS AND EDUCATIONAL CHOICES
View Entire Chapter
1002.21 Postsecondary student and parent rights.—
(1) LEARNING DISABLED STUDENTS.—Impaired and learning disabled students may be eligible for reasonable substitution for admission, graduation, and upper-level division requirements of public postsecondary educational institutions, in accordance with the provisions of ss. 1007.264 and 1007.265.
(2) EXPULSION, SUSPENSION, DISCIPLINE.—Public postsecondary education students may be expelled, suspended, or otherwise disciplined by the president of a public postsecondary educational institution after notice to the student of the charges and a hearing on the charges, in accordance with the provisions of s. 1006.62.
(3) RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.—Public postsecondary educational institutions must provide reasonable accommodations for the religious practices and beliefs of individual students in regard to admissions, class attendance, and the scheduling of examinations and work assignments, in accordance with the provisions of s. 1006.53, and must provide and describe in the student handbook a grievance procedure for students to seek redress when they feel they have been unreasonably denied an educational benefit due to their religious beliefs or practices.
(4) STUDENT HANDBOOKS.—Each state university and Florida College System institution shall provide its students with an up-to-date student handbook that includes student rights and responsibilities, appeals processes available to students, contact persons available to help students, student conduct code, and information regarding HIV and AIDS, in accordance with the provisions of s. 1006.50.
(5) STUDENT OMBUDSMAN OFFICE.—Each state university and Florida College System institution shall maintain a student ombudsman office and established procedures for students to appeal to the office regarding decisions about the student’s access to courses and credit granted toward the student’s degree, in accordance with the provisions of s. 1006.51.
History.—s. 93, ch. 2002-387; s. 8, ch. 2003-8; s. 1, ch. 2009-239; s. 26, ch. 2011-5.

F.S. 1002.21 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1002.21 on CourtListener

Amendments to 1002.21


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1002.21

Total Results: 61  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Donovan v. Dillingham, 688 F.2d 1367 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 460 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2122, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24826

administration of such plan." ERISA § 3(21), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21) 3 The Eleventh
Copy

James P. Cotton, Jr. v. Massachusetts Mut. Life, 402 F.3d 1267 (11th Cir. 2005).

Cited 240 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 35 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1028, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4330, 2005 WL 604905

such plan. ERISA § 3(21)(A), 29 ' U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Significantly, under this definition, a party
Copy

Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Sanders, 138 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 143 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7367

plausibly is a fiduciary. According to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), [A] person is a fiduciary with respect
Copy

Vann K. Howard & Kathryn D. Howard v. Parisian, Inc., Etc. Parisian Employees Health Care Plan Hahn Shoe Co. Prot. Life Ins. Co., 807 F.2d 1560 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 139 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1033, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161, 55 U.S.L.W. 2407

governed by ERISA. See 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, Howard concludes, ERISA does not
Copy

Donovan v. Dillingham, 688 F.2d 1367 (11th Cir. 1982).

Cited 90 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2122

administration of such plan.” ERISA § 3(21), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21). . The Eleventh Circuit has adopted as precedent
Copy

Useden v. Acker, 947 F.2d 1563 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 73 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 14 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2407, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 100, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28884

such plan. 54 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) (1988).15 Thus, ERISA contemplates that fiduciary
Copy

Richard Baker v. Big Star Div. of the Grand Union Co., Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co., Great-West Life Assurance Co., 893 F.2d 288 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 63 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

not a “fiduciary,” as defined under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), and therefore could not be held liable under
Copy

Local Union 2134, United Mine Workers of Am., Etc., Plaintiff v. Powhatan Fuel, Inc., Etc., Leroy Osborne, Jr., 828 F.2d 710 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 53 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 56 U.S.L.W. 2279, 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2641, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12747

health plan under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) (1982). 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) provides that a person is
Copy

Joe Rodger Newell, Jr., Individually & as Nat. Parent & Guardian of Minor Joe Rodger Newell, Iii. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 904 F.2d 644 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 53 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 12 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2193, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10529, 1990 WL 78243

administration of [the] plan.” Id. at § 1002(21)(A)(i), (iii). Thus both Dr. Goldart and Prudential
Copy

William E. Brock, Sec'y of Labor v. William J. Nellis, 809 F.2d 753 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 51 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1206, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2015, 55 U.S.L.W. 2467

and REMANDED. 1 . 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) (1982) defines a fiduciary as any person who
Copy

21 Emp. Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Assocs., Inc., E. Air Lines Variable Benefit Ret. Plan for Pilots Trust Admin. Comm. of the E. Airlines Variable Benefit Ret. Plan for Pilots, 119 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 51 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

161 (1993). Under ERISA § 3(21)(A), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), a fiduciary includes not only those who "exercise[
Copy

Heffner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Of Alabama, 443 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 46 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Cross is a fiduciary under ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i), (iii); Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v
Copy

ITPE Pension Fund v. Roger Hall, 334 F.3d 1011 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 45 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1943, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12477, 2003 WL 21403477

over the assets of a ERISA plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). The dispute on which this appeal centers
Copy

Belinda Kay McKinnon v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, a Corp., 935 F.2d 1187 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 39 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2611, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14995, 1991 WL 111142

fiduciary as that term is defined in 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21). We are not prepared to presume a private cause
Copy

Braxton H. Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 759 F.2d 1518 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 38 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A). See also Eaves v. Penn, 587 F
Copy

21 Emp. Benefits Cas. 2061, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23938u, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 695 Alexis M. Herman, Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Labor v. Nationsbank Trust Co. (Georgia), Nat'l Ass'n, a Nat'l Banking Ass'n, Sovran Capital Mgmt. Corp., a Virginia Corp. Nationsbank of Georgia, N.A., 126 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 1997).

Cited 36 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

such plan. 30 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A) (West Supp.1997). 31
Copy

Dorothy Hamilton v. Allen-Bradley Co., Inc., 244 F.3d 819 (11th Cir. 2001).

Cited 34 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2001 WL 245730

administration of the plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, because, as analyzed in part II
Copy

Donovan v. Walton, 609 F. Supp. 1221 (S.D. Fla. 1985).

Cited 32 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 6 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1677, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19290

investment advice to the plan for a fee. Id. § 1002(21)(A); 29 C.F.R. § 2509.75-8 (question D-3) (1984);
Copy

United States v. Douglas Richard Grizzle Grizzle Insulation Co., Inc., 933 F.2d 943 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 29 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

disposition of its assets.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). The evidence at trial showed that Grizzle
Copy

In Re Managed Care Litig., 185 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 26 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3115, 2002 WL 246575

in the administration of such plan." 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(iii), § 3(21)(A)(iii). This Court has held
Copy

Henry Ford Evans, Cross-Appellees v. Harry Bexley, Cross-Appellants, 750 F.2d 1498 (11th Cir. 1985).

Cited 23 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1342, 6 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1418, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27636

(question D-3) (1984); see 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A). 3 . The plaintiffs contend
Copy

Hill v. Marston, 13 F.3d 1548 (11th Cir. 1994).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the definition of an ERISA fiduciary under Section 1002(21)(A). There is no allegation of such a relationship
Copy

Useden v. Acker, 947 F.2d 1563 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 15 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 WL 245243

in the administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) (1988).15 Thus, ERISA contemplates that fiduciary
Copy

Gregory L. Tippitt v. Reliance Stand. Life Ins., 457 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2006).

Cited 13 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19174, 2006 WL 2105986

from its own assets. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i), (iii). To the extent that it exercises
Copy

Dearmas v. Av-Med, Inc., 814 F. Supp. 1103 (S.D. Fla. 1993).

Cited 12 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6187, 1993 WL 51541

the administration of such plan.... 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A) (West Supp.1992). In O'Reilly, the defendant
Copy

Chapman v. Klemick, 750 F. Supp. 520 (S.D. Fla. 1990).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 12 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2799, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14573, 1990 WL 165102

This case involves the application of 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) to an attorney who represents a beneficiary
Copy

Hearn v. Goodwin (In Re Goodwin), 355 B.R. 337 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006).

Cited 8 times | Published | United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 41, 40 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1428, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2708, 47 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 88, 2006 WL 2949107

1618562, "2 (citing ERISA § 3(21)(A)[10], 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)). Here, Goodwin was the "named fiduciary"
Copy

Response Oncology, Inc. v. MetraHealth Ins., 978 F. Supp. 1052 (S.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 8 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15868, 1997 WL 594641

Section 1002(16)(A)) and "fiduciary" (29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)). Under 29 U.S.C. Section 1002(16)(A), the
Copy

McCurry v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 208 F. Supp. 3d 1251 (M.D. Fla. 2016).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2016 WL 4951184, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130872

in the administration of the plan.” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i)(iii); Newell v. Prudential Ins. Co. of
Copy

Useden v. Acker, 721 F. Supp. 1233 (S.D. Fla. 1989).

Cited 6 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1989 WL 111570

Greenberg, Traurig were, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), fiduciaries of the Plan. In addition, with
Copy

Blue Cross v. Sanders, 138 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 1998).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

plausibly is a fiduciary. According to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), [A] person is a fiduciary with respect
Copy

Chapman v. Klemick, 3 F.3d 1508 (11th Cir. 1993).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1714, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26463, 1993 WL 375990

definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) provides in pertinent part: [A] person is
Copy

Adkins v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins., 957 F. Supp. 211 (M.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2442, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1622, 1997 WL 106183

management or disposition" of "plan assets." § 1002(21)(A). On August 20, 1996, Congress amended section
Copy

Hill v. Marston, 13 F.3d 1548 (11th Cir. 1994).

Cited 5 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2595, 1994 WL 23241

the definition of an ERISA fiduciary under Section 1002(21)(A). There is no allegation of such a relationship
Copy

Int'l Painters & Allied Trades Indus. Pension Fund v. Aragones, 643 F. Supp. 2d 1329 (M.D. Fla. 2008).

Cited 4 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53660, 2008 WL 2415025

management or disposition of its assets." 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i) (emphasis added). Citing the latter part
Copy

Gelles v. Skrotsky, 983 F. Supp. 1398 (M.D. Fla. 1997).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18481, 1997 WL 722011

the administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C.A. Section 1002(21)(A). This definition does not make a person
Copy

Chiroff v. Life Ins. Co. of North Am., 142 F. Supp. 2d 1360 (S.D. Fla. 2000).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21008

determination of disability claims, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A).[3] Plaintiff further asserts that Defendant
Copy

United Healthcare Servs., Inc. v. Sanctuary Surgical Centre, Inc., 5 F. Supp. 3d 1350 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28824, 2014 WL 888644

management or disposition of its assets.” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i). It also includes one who has “any discretionary
Copy

Hope Ctr., Inc. v. Well Am. Grp., Inc., 196 F. Supp. 2d 1243 (S.D. Fla. 2002).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2437, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4690, 2002 WL 508342

in the administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Further, the statute "provides that an ERISA
Copy

Burns v. Rice, 39 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (M.D. Fla. 1998).

Cited 3 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21549, 1998 WL 1021481

in the administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Under ERISA, a fiduciary is required to "discharge
Copy

Lowe v. Telesat Cablevision, Inc., 837 F. Supp. 410 (M.D. Fla. 1993).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16581, 1993 WL 479762

"fiduciary" within the meaning of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, after considering the pleadings
Copy

First Nat'l Life Ins. v. Sunshine-Jr. Food Stores, Inc., 960 F.2d 1546 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 2 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

employees becomes a co-fiduciary pursuant to § 1002(21)(A)(i): (21)(A) Except as otherwise provided in
Copy

Bacon v. Stiefel Labs., Inc., 677 F. Supp. 2d 1331 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 2 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 48 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2703, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1186, 2010 WL 54753

responsibility over Plan administration. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). The Stiefel Defendants argue that Plaintiffs
Copy

Florida Health Sciences Ctr., Inc. v. Humana Med. Plan, Inc., 190 F. Supp. 2d 1297 (M.D. Fla. 2001).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2001 WL 1807761

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C.S. § 1002 (21)), 67 A.L.R. FED. 186, 191 (1984). Courts usually
Copy

Bojorquez v. E.F. Johnson Co., 315 F. Supp. 2d 1368 (S.D. Fla. 2004).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1762, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7605, 2004 WL 938438

under the policy, within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21). In February of 1999, Plaintiff was diagnosed
Copy

Smith v. Williams, 819 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (M.D. Fla. 2011).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 52 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1045, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109173, 2011 WL 4459184

51 F.3d 1449, 1459-61 (9th Cir.1995) (citing § 1002(21) and finding that corporate officers can be individually
Copy

O'Reilly v. Ceuleers, 912 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir. 1990).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 WL 129265

administration of such plan...." 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A). See Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Yampol
Copy

Eric Romano v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co. (USA) (11th Cir. 2024).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Argued: Jan 25, 2024

sponsibility in the administration of [the] plan.” § 1002(21)(A). In other words, “ERISA . . . defines
Copy

Herman v. Nationsbank Trust Co., 126 F.3d 1354 (11th Cir. 1997).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2061, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30368

administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A) (West Supp.1997). Insofar as a trustee
Copy

Heffner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., 443 F.3d 1330 (11th Cir. 2006).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2006 WL 784782

fiduciary under ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i), (iii); Firestone Tire and Rubber
Copy

Raniero Gimeno v. NCHMD, Inc. (11th Cir. 2022).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

9 the plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Proof of fiduciary status “may come from
Copy

Brown v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins., 934 F.2d 1191 (11th Cir. 1991).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Labor and she is not a fiduciary. See 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21) (West 1985). Katharine Brown *1197is also not
Copy

Gustafson v. Warner-Lambert Co., 827 F. Supp. 724 (M.D. Fla. 1993).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10031, 1993 WL 274340

defined by ERISA. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(16)(A)(ii), § 1002(21)(A). (Pl. Comp. P. 2 ¶ 8; DefAns. P. 1 ¶ 8). This
Copy

Dorothy Hamilton v. Unum Life Ins. Co., 217 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2281, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15844

administration of the plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, because, as analyzed in part II
Copy

Dorothy Hamilton v. Unum Life Ins. Co., 217 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 2000).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

the administration of the plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, because, as analyzed in part II
Copy

Herman v. Reinecke Agency, 37 F. Supp. 2d 1338 (M.D. Fla. 1998).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22030, 1998 WL 965995

of such plan." (Emphasis supplied) 29 USC Section 1002(21)(A). The Trustees deny that in their capacities
Copy

Donovan v. Nellis, 528 F. Supp. 538 (N.D. Fla. 1981).

Published | District Court, N.D. Florida | 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1742, 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2209, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17249

Fund within the meaning of ERISA § 3, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21). Second, Foster claims that, even assuming he
Copy

Hunt v. Hawthorn Assocs., Inc. (11th Cir. 1997).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

161 (1993). Under ERISA § 3(21)(A), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), a fiduciary includes not only those who “exercise[]
Copy

Decenzo/Reisman/Kellog, M.D., P.A. v. Cespedes, 711 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Fla. 1989).

Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4162, 1989 WL 40116

plan as defined by ERISA. . 29 U.S.C.A. Section 1002(21)(A)(iii) provides in pertinent part that an
Copy

Ehlen Floor Covering, Inc. v. Lamb, 859 F. Supp. 2d 1285 (M.D. Fla. 2012).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2728, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53635, 2012 WL 1326823

“functional” fiduciary to the Plan. Section 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) provides defines “fiduciary” in relevant part:
Copy

Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A., 818 F. Supp. 1510 (M.D. Fla. 1993).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1054, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4994, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43, 361, 1993 WL 118154

meaning of Section 3(21)(a) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(a).” (Complaint, p. 2.) There were no allegations