Florida Statute 1002.21 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title XLVIII
EARLY LEARNING-20 EDUCATION CODE

Chapter 1002
STUDENT AND PARENTAL RIGHTS AND EDUCATIONAL CHOICES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 1002.21

1002.21 Postsecondary student and parent rights.—

(1) LEARNING DISABLED STUDENTS.—Impaired and learning disabled students may be eligible for reasonable substitution for admission, graduation, and upper-level division requirements of public postsecondary educational institutions, in accordance with the provisions of ss. 1007.264 and 1007.265.

(2) EXPULSION, SUSPENSION, DISCIPLINE.—Public postsecondary education students may be expelled, suspended, or otherwise disciplined by the president of a public postsecondary educational institution after notice to the student of the charges and a hearing on the charges, in accordance with the provisions of s. 1006.62.

(3) RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.—Public postsecondary educational institutions must provide reasonable accommodations for the religious practices and beliefs of individual students in regard to admissions, class attendance, and the scheduling of examinations and work assignments, in accordance with the provisions of s. 1006.53, and must provide and describe in the student handbook a grievance procedure for students to seek redress when they feel they have been unreasonably denied an educational benefit due to their religious beliefs or practices.

(4) STUDENT HANDBOOKS.—Each state university and Florida College System institution shall provide its students with an up-to-date student handbook that includes student rights and responsibilities, appeals processes available to students, contact persons available to help students, student conduct code, and information regarding HIV and AIDS, in accordance with the provisions of s. 1006.50.

(5) STUDENT OMBUDSMAN OFFICE.—Each state university and Florida College System institution shall maintain a student ombudsman office and established procedures for students to appeal to the office regarding decisions about the student’s access to courses and credit granted toward the student’s degree, in accordance with the provisions of s. 1006.51.

History.—s. 93, ch. 2002-387; s. 8, ch. 2003-8; s. 1, ch. 2009-239; s. 26, ch. 2011-5.

F.S. 1002.21 on Google Scholar

F.S. 1002.21 on CourtListener

Amendments to 1002.21

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 1002.21

Total Results: 61

Donovan v. Dillingham

688 F.2d 1367, 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2122, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24826

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 15, 1982 | Docket: 623495

Cited 460 times | Published

administration of such plan." ERISA § 3(21), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21) 3 The Eleventh

James P. Cotton, Jr. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life

402 F.3d 1267, 35 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1028, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4330, 2005 WL 604905

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 16, 2005 | Docket: 398245

Cited 240 times | Published

such plan. ERISA § 3(21)(A), 29 ' U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Significantly, under this definition, a party

Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Sanders

138 F.3d 1347, 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7367

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 74598

Cited 143 times | Published

plausibly is a fiduciary. According to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), [A] person is a fiduciary with respect

Vann K. Howard and Kathryn D. Howard v. Parisian, Inc., Etc. Parisian Employees Health Care Plan Hahn Shoe Company Protective Life Insurance Company

807 F.2d 1560, 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1033, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1161, 55 U.S.L.W. 2407

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 20, 1987 | Docket: 972766

Cited 139 times | Published

governed by ERISA. See 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, Howard concludes, ERISA does not

Donovan v. Dillingham

688 F.2d 1367, 3 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2122

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 15, 1982 | Docket: 66192346

Cited 90 times | Published

administration of such plan.” ERISA § 3(21), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21). . The Eleventh Circuit has adopted as precedent

Useden v. Acker

947 F.2d 1563, 14 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2407, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 100, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28884

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 11, 1991 | Docket: 14701

Cited 73 times | Published

such plan. 54 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) (1988).15 Thus, ERISA contemplates that fiduciary

Richard Baker v. Big Star Division of the Grand Union Company, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Great-West Life Assurance Company

893 F.2d 288

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 29, 1990 | Docket: 292730

Cited 63 times | Published

not a “fiduciary,” as defined under 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), and therefore could not be held liable under

Joe Rodger Newell, Jr., Individually and as Natural Parent and Guardian of Minor Joe Rodger Newell, Iii. v. Prudential Insurance Company of America

904 F.2d 644, 12 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2193, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10529, 1990 WL 78243

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 28, 1990 | Docket: 996430

Cited 53 times | Published

administration of [the] plan.” Id. at § 1002(21)(A)(i), (iii). Thus both Dr. Goldart and Prudential

Local Union 2134, United Mine Workers of America, Etc., Plaintiff v. Powhatan Fuel, Inc., Etc., Leroy Osborne, Jr.

828 F.2d 710, 56 U.S.L.W. 2279, 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2641, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12747

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 28, 1987 | Docket: 811788

Cited 53 times | Published

health plan under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) (1982). 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) provides that a person is

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1625, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23936c, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 294 Harry L. Hunt v. Hawthorne Associates, Inc., Eastern Air Lines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots Trust Administrative Committee of the Eastern Airlines Variable Benefit Retirement Plan for Pilots

119 F.3d 888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 2023562

Cited 51 times | Published

161 (1993). Under ERISA § 3(21)(A), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), a fiduciary includes not only those who "exercise[

William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor v. William J. Nellis

809 F.2d 753, 8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1206, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2015, 55 U.S.L.W. 2467

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 12, 1987 | Docket: 894236

Cited 51 times | Published

and REMANDED. 1 . 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) (1982) defines a fiduciary as any person who

Heffner v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of Alabama

443 F.3d 1330

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 24, 2006 | Docket: 735610

Cited 46 times | Published

Cross is a fiduciary under ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i), (iii); Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v

ITPE Pension Fund v. Roger Hall

334 F.3d 1011, 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1943, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12477, 2003 WL 21403477

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 19, 2003 | Docket: 76140

Cited 45 times | Published

over the assets of a ERISA plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). The dispute on which this appeal centers

Belinda Kay McKinnon v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, a Corporation

935 F.2d 1187, 13 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2611, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14995, 1991 WL 111142

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 12, 1991 | Docket: 326500

Cited 39 times | Published

fiduciary as that term is defined in 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21). We are not prepared to presume a private cause

Braxton H. Anderson v. Ciba-Geigy Corporation

759 F.2d 1518

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 1, 1985 | Docket: 1028914

Cited 38 times | Published

administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A). See also Eaves v. Penn, 587 F

21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2061, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23938u, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 695 Alexis M. Herman, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor v. Nationsbank Trust Company (Georgia), National Association, a National Banking Association, Sovran Capital Management Corporation, a Virginia Corporation Nationsbank of Georgia, N.A.

126 F.3d 1354

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 5, 1997 | Docket: 946347

Cited 36 times | Published

such plan. 30 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A) (West Supp.1997). 31

Dorothy Hamilton v. Allen-Bradley Company, Incorporated

244 F.3d 819, 2001 WL 245730

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 2001 | Docket: 1414301

Cited 34 times | Published

administration of the plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, because, as analyzed in part II

Donovan v. Walton

609 F. Supp. 1221, 6 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1677, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19290

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 31, 1985 | Docket: 1455370

Cited 32 times | Published

investment advice to the plan for a fee. Id. § 1002(21)(A); 29 C.F.R. § 2509.75-8 (question D-3) (1984);

United States v. Douglas Richard Grizzle Grizzle Insulation Company, Inc.

933 F.2d 943

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 31, 1991 | Docket: 831071

Cited 29 times | Published

disposition of its assets.... 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). The evidence at trial showed that Grizzle

In Re Managed Care Litigation

185 F. Supp. 2d 1310, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3115, 2002 WL 246575

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2002 | Docket: 331290

Cited 26 times | Published

in the administration of such plan." 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(iii), § 3(21)(A)(iii). This Court has held

Henry Ford Evans, Cross-Appellees v. Harry Bexley, Cross-Appellants

750 F.2d 1498, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1342, 6 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1418, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27636

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 21, 1985 | Docket: 219967

Cited 23 times | Published

(question D-3) (1984); see 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A). 3 . The plaintiffs contend

Hill v. Marston

13 F.3d 1548

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 15, 1994 | Docket: 1028622

Cited 15 times | Published

the definition of an ERISA fiduciary under Section 1002(21)(A). There is no allegation of such a relationship

Useden v. Acker

947 F.2d 1563, 1991 WL 245243

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 11, 1991 | Docket: 66268872

Cited 15 times | Published

in the administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) (1988).15 Thus, ERISA contemplates that fiduciary

Gregory L. Tippitt v. Reliance Standard Life Ins.

457 F.3d 1227, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19174, 2006 WL 2105986

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 31, 2006 | Docket: 1390225

Cited 13 times | Published

from its own assets. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i), (iii). To the extent that it exercises

Dearmas v. Av-Med, Inc.

814 F. Supp. 1103, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6187, 1993 WL 51541

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1993 | Docket: 1707508

Cited 12 times | Published

the administration of such plan.... 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A) (West Supp.1992). In O'Reilly, the defendant

Hearn v. Goodwin (In Re Goodwin)

355 B.R. 337, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 41, 40 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1428, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2708, 47 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 88, 2006 WL 2949107

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2006 | Docket: 1416678

Cited 8 times | Published

1618562, "2 (citing ERISA § 3(21)(A)[10], 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)). Here, Goodwin was the "named fiduciary"

Response Oncology, Inc. v. MetraHealth Insurance

978 F. Supp. 1052, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15868, 1997 WL 594641

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1997 | Docket: 1973066

Cited 8 times | Published

Section 1002(16)(A)) and "fiduciary" (29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)). Under 29 U.S.C. Section 1002(16)(A), the

Chapman v. Klemick

750 F. Supp. 520, 12 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2799, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14573, 1990 WL 165102

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1990 | Docket: 1041838

Cited 8 times | Published

This case involves the application of 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) to an attorney who represents a beneficiary

McCurry v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

208 F. Supp. 3d 1251, 2016 WL 4951184, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130872

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2016 | Docket: 64310365

Cited 6 times | Published

in the administration of the plan.” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i)(iii); Newell v. Prudential Ins. Co. of

Blue Cross v. Sanders

138 F.3d 1347

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 13, 1998 | Docket: 1118740

Cited 6 times | Published

plausibly is a fiduciary. According to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), [A] person is a fiduciary with respect

Useden v. Acker

721 F. Supp. 1233, 1989 WL 111570

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 1989 | Docket: 886180

Cited 6 times | Published

Greenberg, Traurig were, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), fiduciaries of the Plan. In addition, with

Adkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

957 F. Supp. 211, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2442, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1622, 1997 WL 106183

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 1997 | Docket: 1148962

Cited 5 times | Published

management or disposition" of "plan assets." § 1002(21)(A). On August 20, 1996, Congress amended section

Hill v. Marston

13 F.3d 1548, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2595, 1994 WL 23241

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 15, 1994 | Docket: 64016023

Cited 5 times | Published

the definition of an ERISA fiduciary under Section 1002(21)(A). There is no allegation of such a relationship

Chapman v. Klemick

3 F.3d 1508, 17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1714, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26463, 1993 WL 375990

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 12, 1993 | Docket: 64014682

Cited 5 times | Published

definition of “fiduciary” under ERISA. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) provides in pertinent part: [A] person is

International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Aragones

643 F. Supp. 2d 1329, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53660, 2008 WL 2415025

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2008 | Docket: 1501904

Cited 4 times | Published

management or disposition of its assets." 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i) (emphasis added). Citing the latter part

United Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Sanctuary Surgical Centre, Inc.

5 F. Supp. 3d 1350, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28824, 2014 WL 888644

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2014 | Docket: 64293751

Cited 3 times | Published

management or disposition of its assets.” 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i). It also includes one who has “any discretionary

Hope Center, Inc. v. Well America Group, Inc.

196 F. Supp. 2d 1243, 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2437, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4690, 2002 WL 508342

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2002 | Docket: 2381756

Cited 3 times | Published

in the administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Further, the statute "provides that an ERISA

Chiroff v. Life Insurance Co. of North America

142 F. Supp. 2d 1360, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21008

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2000 | Docket: 2175973

Cited 3 times | Published

determination of disability claims, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A).[3] Plaintiff further asserts that Defendant

Burns v. Rice

39 F. Supp. 2d 1350, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21549, 1998 WL 1021481

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1998 | Docket: 2173012

Cited 3 times | Published

in the administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Under ERISA, a fiduciary is required to "discharge

Gelles v. Skrotsky

983 F. Supp. 1398, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18481, 1997 WL 722011

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1997 | Docket: 1819341

Cited 3 times | Published

the administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C.A. Section 1002(21)(A). This definition does not make a person

Bacon v. STIEFEL LABORATORIES, INC.

677 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 48 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2703, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1186, 2010 WL 54753

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 4, 2010 | Docket: 2369736

Cited 2 times | Published

responsibility over Plan administration. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). The Stiefel Defendants argue that Plaintiffs

Lowe v. Telesat Cablevision, Inc.

837 F. Supp. 410, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16581, 1993 WL 479762

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1993 | Docket: 2221935

Cited 2 times | Published

"fiduciary" within the meaning of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, after considering the pleadings

First National Life Insurance v. Sunshine-Jr. Food Stores, Inc.

960 F.2d 1546

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 1992 | Docket: 66272799

Cited 2 times | Published

employees becomes a co-fiduciary pursuant to § 1002(21)(A)(i): (21)(A) Except as otherwise provided in

Bojorquez v. E.F. Johnson Co.

315 F. Supp. 2d 1368, 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1762, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7605, 2004 WL 938438

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2004 | Docket: 2249357

Cited 1 times | Published

under the policy, within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21). In February of 1999, Plaintiff was diagnosed

Florida Health Sciences Center, Inc. v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.

190 F. Supp. 2d 1297, 2001 WL 1807761

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 2001 | Docket: 75536

Cited 1 times | Published

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C.S. § 1002 (21)), 67 A.L.R. FED. 186, 191 (1984). Courts usually

Eric Romano v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 30, 2024 | Docket: 68192517

Published

Argued: Jan 25, 2024

sponsibility in the administration of [the] plan.” § 1002(21)(A). In other words, “ERISA . . . defines

Raniero Gimeno v. NCHMD, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 28, 2022 | Docket: 63552892

Published

9 the plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Proof of fiduciary status “may come from

Ehlen Floor Covering, Inc. v. Lamb

859 F. Supp. 2d 1285, 53 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2728, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53635, 2012 WL 1326823

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2012 | Docket: 65981061

Published

“functional” fiduciary to the Plan. Section 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A) provides defines “fiduciary” in relevant part:

Smith v. Williams

819 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 52 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1045, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109173, 2011 WL 4459184

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2011 | Docket: 2016079

Published

51 F.3d 1449, 1459-61 (9th Cir.1995) (citing § 1002(21) and finding that corporate officers can be individually

Heffner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.

443 F.3d 1330, 2006 WL 784782

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 29, 2006 | Docket: 398533

Published

fiduciary under ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A)(i), (iii); Firestone Tire and Rubber

Dorothy Hamilton v. Unum Life Insurance Co.

217 F.3d 1321, 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2281, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15844

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 10, 2000 | Docket: 212444

Published

administration of the plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, because, as analyzed in part II

Dorothy Hamilton v. Unum Life Insurance Co.

217 F.3d 1321

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 10, 2000 | Docket: 395945

Published

the administration of the plan. See 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A). Therefore, because, as analyzed in part II

Herman v. Reinecke Agency

37 F. Supp. 2d 1338, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22030, 1998 WL 965995

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1998 | Docket: 2371932

Published

of such plan." (Emphasis supplied) 29 USC Section 1002(21)(A). The Trustees deny that in their capacities

Herman v. Nationsbank Trust Company

126 F.3d 1354, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2061, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 30368

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 5, 1997 | Docket: 2036156

Published

administration of such plan. 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A) (West Supp.1997). Insofar as a trustee

Hunt v. Hawthorn Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 5, 1997 | Docket: 74098

Published

161 (1993). Under ERISA § 3(21)(A), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(A), a fiduciary includes not only those who “exercise[]

Gustafson v. Warner-Lambert Co.

827 F. Supp. 724, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10031, 1993 WL 274340

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 1993 | Docket: 65985286

Published

defined by ERISA. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(16)(A)(ii), § 1002(21)(A). (Pl. Comp. P. 2 ¶ 8; DefAns. P. 1 ¶ 8). This

Sussman v. Salem, Saxon & Nielsen, P.A.

818 F. Supp. 1510, 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1054, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4994, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,361, 1993 WL 118154

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1993 | Docket: 65983647

Published

meaning of Section 3(21)(a) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21)(a).” (Complaint, p. 2.) There were no allegations

Brown v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

934 F.2d 1191

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 27, 1991 | Docket: 66265041

Published

Labor and she is not a fiduciary. See 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21) (West 1985). Katharine Brown *1197is also not

O'Reilly v. Ceuleers

912 F.2d 1383, 1990 WL 129265

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 26, 1990 | Docket: 66257860

Published

administration of such plan...." 29 U.S.C.A. § 1002(21)(A). See Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Yampol

Decenzo/Reisman/Kellog, M.D., P.A. v. Cespedes

711 F. Supp. 612, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4162, 1989 WL 40116

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1989 | Docket: 66178815

Published

plan as defined by ERISA. . 29 U.S.C.A. Section 1002(21)(A)(iii) provides in pertinent part that an

Donovan v. Nellis

528 F. Supp. 538, 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1742, 2 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2209, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17249

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1981 | Docket: 1358837

Published

Fund within the meaning of ERISA § 3, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(21). Second, Foster claims that, even assuming he