CopyCited 1 times | Published | Florida 5th District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 1775527, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6742
...des K through 6 in its first year, grades K through 7 in its second year, and grades K through 8 thereafter. Renaissance hoped to open the school with 862 students and to grow to 1,415 students by its fifth year. The application was made pursuant to section 1002.331, Florida Statutes (2011), which allowed Renaissance to replicate a “high-performing” charter school already in operation....
...be reversed. The “substantially replicates” requirement is contained in those provisions of the charter school statute which refer to “high-performing” charter schools. Schools identified as “high-performing” charter schools pursuant to section 1002.331, Florida Statutes, are given preferential treatment in the application process....
...hin the state under paragraph (a) in any year. A subsequent application to establish a charter school under paragraph (a) may not be submitted un *75 less each charter school established in this manner achieves high-performing charter school status. § 1002.331(3)(a)-(b), Fla....
...and by allowing it to use the elementary portion of the school being replicated (North Broward *76 Elementary) to establish yet another school (this one in Lake County), the State Board is allowing Renaissance to sidestep the limitations imposed by section 1002.331(3)(b), Florida Statutes, which states that “[a] high-performing charter school may not establish more than one charter school within the state under paragraph (a) in any year.” The State Board’s interpretation of the statute es...
CopyPublished | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
...We agree and reverse. 1
1 We have consolidated both appeals for purposes of this opinion.
In August 2015, Somerset filed two applications with the Indian River
School Board to replicate high-performing charter schools it was operating
in Miami, pursuant to section 1002.331, Florida Statutes (2015)....
CopyPublished | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...Melissa Gross-Arnold and Shawn A. Arnold of Arnold Law Firm, Jacksonville, for
Appellee.
SWANSON, J.
This is an appeal from a summary final judgment enjoining the Department
of Education from declassifying appellee as a high-performing charter school
pursuant to section 1002.331, Florida Statutes (2013)....
...which remained the sole mechanism for determining the loss of high-performing
2
charter school status or for the Commissioner of Education to declassify high-
performing charter schools based upon school grades. This appeal followed.
Section 1002.331, Florida Statutes (2013), provides in pertinent part:
(1) A charter school is a high-performing charter
school if it:
(a) Received at least two school grades of “A” and
no school grade below “B,” pursuant to s....
...longer meets the criteria in subsection (1), at which time
the commissioner shall send a letter providing
notification of its declassification as a high-performing
charter school.
(Emphasis added). The legislature first enacted section 1002.331 effective July 1,
2011....
CopyPublished | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
...In August 2015, Somerset filed an application with the St. Lucie County
School Board to establish a middle school that would replicate a high-
performing charter school that it was currently operating in Broward
County. The application was made pursuant to section
1002.331, Florida
Statutes (2015), which allows “[a] high-performing charter school [to]
submit an application pursuant to s.
1002.33(6) in any school district in
the state to establish and operate a new charter school that will
substantially replicate its educational program.” §
1002.331(3)(a), Fla.
Stat....
CopyPublished | Florida 4th District Court of Appeal
...In August 2015, Somerset filed an application with the St. Lucie County
School Board to establish a middle school that would replicate a high-
performing charter school that it was currently operating in Broward
County. The application was made pursuant to section
1002.331, Florida
Statutes (2015), which allows “[a] high-performing charter school [to]
submit an application pursuant to s.
1002.33(6) in any school district in
the state to establish and operate a new charter school that will
substantially replicate its educational program.” §
1002.331(3)(a), Fla.
Stat....
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2013 WL 275585, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1079
...rminate a charter contract. See id. at 1193 . We see no constitutional impediment to the ALJ’s decision. Affirmed. ALTENBERND and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur. . In 2011, the legislature enacted legislation regarding high-performing charter schools. See § 1002.331, Fla....
...(2011); Ch.2011-232, § 1, at 3451, Laws of Fla. (effective July 1, 2011). The statute is not applicable to the dispute before us and we do not opine on whether Trinity's two schools would satisfy the definition of a high-performing charter school. See § 1002.331(1). We note that the statute allows the sponsor of such high-performing schools to consolidate the schools under a single charter; School Board approval does not appear to be necessary. See § 1002.331(2)....
CopyPublished | Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal | 2014 WL 3843758, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11987
...(Renaissance) to operate a charter school in Polk County over the
objections of the School Board. The School Board argues that the proposed charter
school's educational program did not "substantially replicate" that of the high-performing
charter school being replicated. See § 1002.331(3)(a), Fla....
...We agree and
reverse.
The facts of this case are substantially similar to those articulated in
School Board of Seminole County v. Renaissance Charter School, Inc.,
113 So. 3d 72
(Fla. 5th DCA 2013). Here, Renaissance filed a high-performing charter school
application pursuant to section
1002.331, for Renaissance Charter School at Polk, a K
through 8 charter school....
...rd, Renaissance argued
that the material issue was not substantial replication, but instead whether the proposed
charter school would be a high-performing school. The School Board countered that
-3-
section 1002.331 required substantial replication....
...City of Fort
Walton Beach,
534 So. 2d 754, 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) ("That an appellate court may
not consider matters outside the record is so elemental there is no excuse for an
attorney to attempt to bring such matters before the court."). Moreover, section
1002.331(3)(b) limits a high-performing charter school to one application for a charter
school per year....