Cases from cite.case.law:

LASHER, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 369 F. Supp. 3d 243 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . . § 1005.21(a). . . . . § 1005.21(c). . . . . § 1005.21(e). . . . standard of review on a disputed issue of law is "whether the initial decision is erroneous." 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21 . . . the right of any petitioner or respondent who is found liable to seek judicial review." 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21 . . .

GREENBRIER NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE MEDICAID SERVICES,, 686 F.3d 521 (8th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 1005.21(h). . . .

S. RUDMAN, M. D. v. O. LEAVITT, U. S., 578 F. Supp. 2d 812 (D. Md. 2008)

. . . . § 1005.21(k)(l) (2000). . . .

ST. ANTHONY HOSPITAL, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 309 F.3d 680 (10th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 1005.21. . . . Pertinent to our consideration is 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21(a): Any party may appeal the initial decision of . . . Relying on the text of 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21, the DAB concluded that the government’s submission — though . . . As stated above, § 1005.21(c) permits any party to file a brief opposing another party’s exceptions “ . . . Under 42 C.F.R. § 1005.21(h), the DAB reviews ALJ findings of fact to see if the findings are “supported . . .

E. STERNBERG, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 299 F.3d 1201 (10th Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 1005.21 (providing that an excluded individual may appeal ALJ decision to DAB). . . .

SEIDE, v. E. SHALALA,, 31 F. Supp. 2d 466 (E.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . . § 1005.21(a), (g). Thus, ALJ Riotto’s decision became Defendant’s final decision. Kahn v. . . .

C. PATEL, M. D. v. E. SHALALA,, 17 F. Supp. 2d 662 (W.D. Ky. 1998)

. . . . § 1005.21(a) and (g). . . . . § 1005.21(e). . . . . § 1005.21(f). . . .

A. BARRETT, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 14 F.3d 26 (8th Cir. 1994)

. . . . § 1005.21 (1992) (appeal to Departmental Appeals Board). . . .