green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kimbrell v. State
See Roark v. State, 105 Ga. 736 ( 32 S. E. 125 ); Pressley v. State, 132 Ga. 64 ( 63 S. E. 784 ); Jackson v. State, 132 Ga. 570 ( 64 S. E. 656 ); Cantrell v. State, 141 Ga. 98 ( 80 S. E. 649 ); Hughes v. State, 174 Ga. 165 ( 162 S. E. 389 ); Faison v. State, 13 Ga. App. 180 ( 79 S. E. 39 ). 2.
Hilton & Dodge Lumber Company
v.
Browning
v.
Browning
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Dec 17, 1898.
J. B. Geiger, for plaintiff in error., Wooten & Wooten, contra.
Ilewis.
Published
ILewis, J.
Where the sole complaint in a petition for certiorari is that the verdict is contrary to the evidence, this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the certiorari when the evidence is conflicting on material issues in the case.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.