Satterfield v. Coggins, 38 S.E. 400 (Ga. 1901). · Go Syfert
Search
Satterfield v. Coggins, 38 S.E. 400 (Ga. 1901). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Satterfield
v.
Coggins
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Mar 28, 1901.
38 S.E. 400
Thomas W. Milner & Sons and E. W. Coleman,lex plaintiffs., Teasley & Hutcherson, for defendant.
Cobb.
Published
Cobb, J.

There was no error of law complained of. Though the evidence was conflicting, the verdict was amply supported, and the discretion of the trial judge in refusing to grant a new trial will not be controlled.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.