Rawis v. State, 116 Ga. 617 (Ga. 1902). · Go Syfert
Search
Rawis v. State, 116 Ga. 617 (Ga. 1902). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Champion v. State (gactapp, 1918-01-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Champion v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1918 · confidence medium
Hatcher v. State, 116 Ga. 617, 621 ( 42 S. E. 1018 ); Phillips v. State, 138 Ga. 815 (2) ( 76 S. E. 352 ).
cited Cited "see" Rembert v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1947 · signal: see · confidence high
See, in this connection, Rawls v. State, 116 Ga. 617 ( 42 S. E. 1008 ).
Rawis
v.
State
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Dec 9, 1902.
116 Ga. 617
Cantrell & Bamsaur, for plamtiff in error., Sam. P. Maddox, solicitor-general, contra.
Fish.
Published
Fish, J.

The jury being the judges of the credibility of witnesses, and the testi mony upon which the State relied, if credible, being sufficient to authorize a conviction, and the trial judge being satisfied with the verdict, the Supreme Court will not interfere with the discretion exercised by him in overruling a motion for a new trial, based solely upon the general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.