Youngblood v. Woodward, 60 S.E. 851 (Ga. 1908). · Go Syfert
Search
Youngblood v. Woodward, 60 S.E. 851 (Ga. 1908). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kane v. Cohen (gactapp, 1987-03-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1909 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1909 1967 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kane v. Cohen
Ga. Ct. App. · 1987 · confidence medium
Settle v. Allison, 8 Ga. 201 ; Tompkins v. Corry, 14 Ga. 118 ; Wood v. McGuire’s Children, 17 Ga. 361 (1) Sellers v. Mann, 113 Ga. 643 ( 39 SE 11 ); Cooper v. Branch, 86 Ga. 234 ( 12 SE 808 ); Jordan v. Downs, 118 Ga. 544 (2) ( 45 SE 439 ); Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 SE 1000 ); Koon v. Atlantic Coast Line R.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rucker v. Camden Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1987 · confidence medium
Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 352-355 (1, 2) ( 60 SE 1000 ) (1908); Ballard v. Turner, 147 Ga. App. 584, 585-586 (3) ( 249 SE2d 637 ) (1978); Colley v. Dillon, 158 Ga. App. 416, 417-418 (3) ( 280 SE2d 425 ) (1981).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Colley v. Dillon
Ga. Ct. App. · 1981 · confidence medium
It is better to do this than to receive the verdict, which would probably have to be set aside on motion for a new trial, resulting in the expense and trouble of another trial.” Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 SE 1000 ) (1908).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hamrick v. Seward (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1972 · confidence medium
"A tender, to be effectual, must be for the full amount due.” Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 SE 1000 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Smith v. Oliver
Ga. · 1964 · confidence medium
The holder of the security deed was entitled to payment in the amount of the plaintiff’s bid, Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 SE 1000 ), Pope v. Thompson, 157 Ga. 891 ( 122 SE 604 ), Lively v. Munday, 201 Ga. 409, 418 ( 40 SE2d 62 , 173 ALR 1295 ), and the alleged tender of money in no definite amount was not a tender of the amount of such bid.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Johns v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1949 · confidence medium
In Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 S. E. 1000 ), it is held: “Where the meaning of a verdict is certain and it is merely imperfect and informal, the court can put the verdict in proper form in conformity to the intention of the jury as expressed in the verdict.” See also Code, § 110-110.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lowery v. Morton
Ga. · 1946 · confidence medium
In Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 S. E. 1000 ), Mr. Justice Holden, speaking for the court and discussing the question now under consideration, said: “When ever a verdict is ambiguous and uncertain in its meaning or does not cover a substantial issue made by the pleadings in the case upon which proof is offered, it is proper to have the jury retire again for the purpose of rendering another verdict, under proper instructions from the court.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Manry v. First National Bank
Ga. · 1942 · confidence medium
In Herndon v. Sims, 7 Ga. App. 675 ( 67 S. E. 835 ), the Court of Appeals held: “There was no error in Causing the verdict to be reformed or rémodeled in the presence of the jury before they had retired from the box.” See Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 S. E. 1000 ). 8.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Owen v. Anderson
Ga. Ct. App. · 1936 · confidence medium
See Code, § 110-101; Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 S. E. 1000 ).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hogg v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Ga. Ct. App. · 1925 · confidence medium
R. 592); Steed v. Cruise, 70 Ga. 168 (5); Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 356 (4) ( 60 S. E. 1000 ).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jones v. Peacock
Ga. Ct. App. · 1922 · confidence medium
Civil Code (1910), § 4322; Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 355 ( 60 S. E. 1000 ); Hiller v. Howell, 74 Ga. 174, 176 ; Ragan v. Newton, 27 Ga. App. 534 (2) ( 109 S. E. 412 ). 2.
discussed Cited "see" Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Chandler
Ga. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
"The jury have the right and power to correct or change their verdict at any time before it has been finally recorded and they have been discharged.” 89 CJS 190, Trial, § 511; see Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350, 354 ( 60 SE 1000 ) and cits.; see also Blalock v. Waldrup, 84 Ga. 145 (2) ( 10 SE 622 ); Seaboard Air Line R. v. Randolph, 136 Ga. 505 (6) ( 71 SE 887 ); Piedmont Cotton Mills v. General Warehouse &c., Inc., 222 Ga. 164, 171 ( 149 SE2d 72 ).
cited Cited "see" Department of Transportation v. Worley
Ga. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Pilcher, 130 Ga. 350 (1) ( 60 SE 1000 ); Conner v. Mangum, 132 Ga. App. 100, 103 (2) ( 207 SE2d 604 ).
Youngblood
v.
Woodward
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Mar 25, 1908.
60 S.E. 851
B. W. Jordan, O. H. Howard, and James K. Hines, for plaintiff., Evans & Evans, for defendant.
Yumpkin.
Published
Yumpkin, J.

Under the evidence in this case, there was no error in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Jiistices concur.