Jenkins v. State, 102 S.E. 830 (Ga. 1920). · Go Syfert
Search
Jenkins v. State, 102 S.E. 830 (Ga. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Yarbrough v. First National Bank (gactapp, 1977-10-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" Yarbrough v. First National Bank
Ga. Ct. App. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brown v. Smith, 150 Ga. 111 (2) ( 102 SE 813 ) (1920); Hammock v. Hammock, 209 Ga. 751 (2) ( 76 SE2d 15 ) (1953); Mote v. Mote, 214 Ga. 134 ( 103 SE2d 565 ) (1958).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Abney v. Harris
Ga. · 1951 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Brown v. Smith, 150 Ga. 111 ( 102 S. E. 813 ); Pig’n Whistle Sandwich Shops v. Keith, 167 Ga. 735 ( 146 S. E. 455 ); Payton v. Ford, 134 Ga. 587 ( 68 S. E. 300 ); Powell v. Parker, 38 Ga. 644 .
Jenkins
v.
State
No. 1694.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Apr 14, 1920.
102 S.E. 830
Thomas B. Brown and Charles J. Graham, for plaintiff in error., Clifford Walker, attorney-general, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, M. C. Bennet, and B. A. Stephens, contra.
Hill.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Hill, J.

1. A ground of the motion for new trial which complains that “ the court failed to charge the law and [of] manslaughter ” is not a good assignment of error, and can not be considered by the Supreme Court. Each assignment must be complete within itself. If manslaughter should have been charged, it is necessary that the ground of the motion for new trial complaining of the refusal to so charge should state what grade of manslaughter, whether voluntary or involuntary. Knight v. State, 148 Ga. 40 (3), 41 (95 S. E. 679).

2. Other assignments of error, where sufficient to raise a question for determination by the court, are without merit.

3. The verdict is supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., absent for providential cause.