Mullis v. Carter, 121 S.E. 242 (Ga. 1924). · Go Syfert
Search
Mullis v. Carter, 121 S.E. 242 (Ga. 1924). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Martin v. State (gactapp, 1979-04-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1925 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1925 1975 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Martin v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1979 · confidence medium
Campbell v. State, 157 Ga. 233, 235 (121 SE 306); Pistor v. State, 219 Ga. 161 (2)(b) ( 132 SE2d 183 ); Rochester v. State, 221 Ga. 451 (2) ( 145 SE2d 505 ); Smith v. State, 236 Ga. 12 (12) ( 222 SE2d 308 ).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Haas v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1978 · confidence medium
Campbell v. State, 157 Ga. 233, 235 ( 121 SE 306 ).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Watts v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1977 · confidence medium
Co., 200 Ga. 69, 74 ( 35 SE2d 899 ); Campbell v. State, 157 Ga. 233, 235 ( 121 SE 306 ); Engineered Builders v. Lamar Nash Buick-Pontiac, *134 133 Ga. App. 141 (2) ( 210 SE2d 179 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Wachovia Mortgage Co. v. Moore (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1976 · confidence medium
Campbell v. State, 157 Ga. 233, 235 ( 121 SE 306 ); Adams v. Adams, 218 Ga. 67, 68 (4) ( 126 SE2d 769 ); Powell v. Blackstock, 64 Ga. App. 442 (5) ( 13 SE2d 503 ).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) MacOn-bibb County Hospital Authority v. Appleton (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1971 · confidence medium
Campbell v. State, 157 Ga. 233, 235 ( 121 SE 306 ); Adams v. Adams, 218 Ga. 67 (4) ( 126 SE2d 769 ); Powell v. Blackstock, 64 Ga. App. 442 (5) ( 13 SE2d 503 ).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Fuels, Inc. v. Rutland
Ga. Ct. App. · 1970 · confidence medium
See Sappington v. Bell, 115 Ga. 856 ( 42 SE 233 ); Owens v. State, 120 Ga. 296, 303 ( 48 SE 21 ); Campbell v. State, 157 Ga. 233, 235 ( 121 SE 306 ); Adams v. Adams, 218 Ga. 67 (4) ( 126 SE2d 769 ).
Mullis
v.
Carter
No. 3835.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jan 16, 1924.
121 S.E. 242
Williams & Williams, for plaintiffs in error., Jerome Crawley, contra.
Hill.
Published
Hill, J.

On conflicting evidence the court did not err in granting the interlocutory injunction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.