green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
London v. Bank of the South
(2×)
After reviewing the pleadings, we hold that the defense of accord and satisfaction was not raised “in substance.” Compare Slappey Builders v. FDIC, 157 Ga. App. 343, 347 (2) ( 277 SE2d 328 ) (1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bates v. Bates
Corp., 157 Ga. App. 343, 347 ( 277 SE2d 328 ), the defendant contends that his defense of accord and satisfaction had not been pierced and no showing had been made to authorize the granting of summary judgment under the circumstances.
CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
v.
DAVALOS (three cases)
v.
DAVALOS (three cases)
59909, 59910, 59911.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Feb 4, 1981.
Eugene A. Epting, for appellants., Peter J. Rice, Jr., James L. Cline, Jr., for appellee (case no. 59909)., David G. Kopp, for appellee (case nos. 59910, 59911).
Quillian.
Published
Division 2 of the opinion and the judgment of the court in this case, 154 Ga. App. 776 (269 SE2d 897), having been reversed by the Supreme Court on certiorari, 246 Ga. 746 (272 SE2d 702), Division 2 and the judgment are hereby vacated, the decision of the Supreme Court is adopted as Division 2 of our decision, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed.
Judgment reversed.