green
Positive treatment
11.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1931 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1931
1978
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Waycross v. Pierce County Board of Commissioners
SeeOCGA § 36-30-2; Kirkland v. Johnson, 209 Ga. 824 ( 76 SE2d 396 ) (1953); South Ga. Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649, 653 ( 151 SE 513 ) (1929).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Fairfax MK, Inc. v. City of Clarkston
Ellis v. Stokes, 207 Ga. 423, 429-430 (2) ( 61 SE2d 806 ) (1950); South Georgia Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649, 654-655 (2) ( 151 SE 513 ) (1929). 3.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Olley Valley Estates, Inc. v. Fussell
(2×)
See, Crawford v. Brewster, 225 Ga. 404 (1) ( 169 SE2d 317 ); Story v. City of Macon, 205 Ga. 590, 594 ( 54 SE2d 396 ); South Georgia Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649, 656 ( 151 SE 513 ).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Barr v. City Council of Augusta
R. 933); South Georgia Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649, 653 ( 151 S. E. 513 ). 5.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Barr v. City Council of Augusta
“The business affairs of a municipality are committed to the corporate authorities, and the courts will not interfere except in a clear case of mismanagement or fraud.” McMaster v. Waynesboro, 122 Ga. 231 (5) ( 50 S. E. 122 ); South Georgia Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649, 652 ( 151 S. E. 513 ); Lawson v. Moultrie, 194 Ga. 699, 703 ( 22 S. E. 2d, 592 ). 2.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Morton v. City of Waycross
A. 335) ; South Georgia Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649, 652 ( 151 S. E. 513 ) ; Danielly v. Cabaniss, 52 Ga. 211 (4) ; McMaster v. Waynesboro, 122 Ga. 231 (5) ( 50 S. E. 122 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Murphy v. American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia, Inc.
See South Georgia Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649 (2) ( 151 SE 513 ) (1929).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Todd v. Essling
(2×)
See, South Georgia Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649 , 151 S. E. 513 ; Kerr v. Trego, 47 Pa. 292 ; 67 C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Co-Op Cab Co. v. Settle
See also dictum of Chief Justice Russell in South Georgia Power Co. v. Baumann, 169 Ga. 649 , 653, 151 S.E. 513 .
Pike
v.
Wunschow
v.
Wunschow
No. 7036.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Dec 16, 1929.
W. M. Henry and Norman Shaltuck, for plaintiffs in error., McClure & McClure, contra.
Beck.
Published
Beck, P. J.
1. Under the allegations of the petition in this case the petitioner had such right and title in the land which he sought to have placed in the hands of a receiver, pending the litigation between himself and the defendant, as entitled him to the relief sought, upon proof of the allegations made; and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition.
2. Under the evidence introduced upon the hearing, it does not appear that there was an abuse of discretion upon the part of the court in appointing a receiver.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.