Snell v. State, 175 S.E. 14 (Ga. 1934). · Go Syfert
Search
Snell v. State, 175 S.E. 14 (Ga. 1934). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Finance Co. v. Citizens Loan & Savings Co. (ga, 1937-06-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) National Finance Co. v. Citizens Loan & Savings Co.
Ga. · 1937 · confidence medium
Where a purchaser of wages or salary fails to comply with the provisions of section 25-319 in respect to giving the employer notice of the purchase within five days after the sale, the assignment is not “binding upon any individual, firm, or corporation to whom said notice is directed.” See Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Nash Loan Co., 179 Ga. 52, 54 ( 175 S. E. 247 ); Southern Ry.
Snell
v.
State
No. 10186.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jun 14, 1934.
175 S.E. 14
J. Frank Jackson and W. M. Goodwin, for plaintiff in error., M. J. Yeomans, attorney-general, M. L. Gross, solicitor-general, B. D. Murphy and J. T. Goree, assistant attorneys-general, contra.
Atkinson, Hutcheson.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
Hutcheson, J.

1. Even if language used by the solicitor-general be construed to be improper, the failure of defendant to make proper motion for mistrial leaves nothing for this court to pass on. Nix v. State, 149 Ga. 304 (100 S. E. 197).

2. The phrase “reasonable doubt” sufficiently defines itself. Paulk v. State, 148 Ga. 304 (2) (96 S. E. 417); Bell v. State, 148 Ga. 352 (96 S. E. 861).

3. There is no merit in the other grounds of the motion for new trial. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Atkinson, J.,

concurs in the result, but not in all that is said in the first headnote.