Thompson v. Aldredge, 200 S.E. 799 (Ga. 1939). · Go Syfert
Thompson v. Aldredge, 200 S.E. 799 (Ga. 1939). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ray v. Sears (ga, 1965-01-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1941 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1941 1983 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Ray v. Sears
Ga. · 1965 · confidence medium
See Crosby v. Higgs, 181 Ga. 314, 315 (2) ( 182 SE 10 ); Wardlaw v. Wardlaw, 187 Ga. 467, 469 (3) ( 1 SE2d 24 ); Harper v. Hudson, 210 Ga. 751, 754 ( 82 SE2d 854 ).
examined Cited "see" Bowers v. Hardwick (8×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
SCOTUS · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Thompson v. Aldredge, 187 Ga. 467 , 200 S. E. 799 (1939).
THOMPSON
v.
ALDREDGE, sheriff
No. 12632.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jan 12, 1939.
200 S.E. 799
J. 0. Miner, James B. Venable, John G. Morris Jr., and B. J. Dantone, for plaintiff., John A. Boyhin, solicitor-general, and J. W. LeGraw, for defendant.
Grice.
Cited by 10 opinions  |  Published
Grice, Justice.

This record presents the question whether the crime of sodomy, as defined by our law, can be accomplished between two women. By Code, § 26-5901, sodomy is defined as “the carnal knowledge and connection against the order of nature, by man with man, or in the same unnatural manner with woman.” Wharton, in his Criminal Law, volume 1, 11 ed., § 754, lays down the rule that “the crime of sodomy proper can not be accomplished between two women, though the crime of bestiality may be.” We have no reason to believe that our lawmakers in defining the crime of sodomy intended to give it any different meaning. Indeed the language of the Code above quoted seems to us to deliberately exclude the idea that this particular crime may be accomplished by two women, although it may be committed by two men, or a man and a woman. That the act here alleged to have been committed is just as loathsome when participated in by two women does not justify us in reading into the definition of the crime something which the lawmakers omitted.

The petitioner’s conviction was a nullity and she is entitled to be discharged. Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.