green
Positive treatment
12.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1943 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1943
1984
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Evans v. State
So are threatening, profane, or obscene revil-ings.” Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 470 ( 26 SE2d 755 ) (1943).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Nathan v. Duncan
The rationale upon which this rule requiring exception to be made before verdict is grounded is discussed in Dowis v. McCurdy, 109 Ga. App. 488, 498 ( 136 SE2d 389 ), citing Bailey & Co. v. Ogden, 75 Ga. 874 (4); Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 SE2d 755 ) and Arrington v. Thompson, 211 Ga. 734, 739 ( 88 SE2d 402 ).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Nelson v. State
Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 469 ( 26 SE2d 755 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dowis v. McCurdy
(2×)
He was present, and if he desired more specific instructions, he should have asked for them.” Moreover, it is the duty of counsel “to assist the judge in clarify ing and simplifying the issues which should be submitted to the jury,” Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 SE2d 755), and in “determining what issues should be submitted to the jury.” Arrington v. Thompson, 211 Ga. 734, 739 ( 88 SE2d 402 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Elder v. State
A. (NS) 934; Myrick v. State, 199 Ga. 244 , 34 S. E. 2d 36 ), yet “Malice shall be implied where no considerable provocation appears, and where all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart.” Code § 26-1004; Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 472 ( 26 S. E. 2d 755 ).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Arrington v. Thompson
Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 S. E. 2d 755 ); Edmiston v. Whitney Land Co., 198 Ga. 546, 549 ( 32 S. E. 2d 259 ); Palmer v. Hinson, 201 Ga. 654, 657 ( 40 S. E. 2d 526 ). *740 4.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rutledge v. Crowe
Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 S. E. 2d 755 ); Deaton v. Swanson, 196 Ga. 833 (5) ( 28 S. E. 2d 126 ); Edmiston v. Whitney Land Co., 198 Ga. 546, 549 ( 32 S. E. 2d 259 ); Palmer v. Hinson, 201 Ga. 654, 657 ( 40 S. E. 2d 526 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Vinson v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
(2×)
Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 S. E. 2d, 755 ).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Howard v. Lee
Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 S. E. 2d, 755 ).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Palmer v. Hinson
Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 S. E. 2d, 755 ); Edmiston v. Whitney Land Co., 198 Ga. 546, 549 (32.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Edmonds v. State
Thompson v. State, 55 Ga. 47 (7); Manye v. State, 99 Ga. 212 (2) ( 25 S. E. 307 ); Slocumb v. State, 157 Ga. 131 (7) (supra); Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471-472 ( 26 S. E. 2d, 755 ). , Under the facts appearing, the Code,'§ 26-1409, referring to opprobrious words or abusive language as possible justification for a mere assault or assault and battery, has no bearing upon the case; there being nothing to show that the deceased used any such language toward the defendant until after the assault and battery (twisting arm) had ended.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Edmiston v. Whitney Land Company
Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 S. E. 2d, 755 ).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Davis v. Buie
Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 S. E. 2d, 755 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Spence v. State
OCGA § 15-6-1 (11); see Hubbard v. State, 208 Ga. 472, 473 (3) ( 67 SE2d 562 ) (1951); see Guess v. Morgan, 196 Ga. 265, 273 (5) ( 26 SE2d 424 ) (1943).
cited
Cited "see"
Tate v. State
See Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468 ( 26 SE2d 755 ).” Gresham v. State, 216 Ga. 106 (5) ( 115 SE2d 191 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Gresham v. State
See Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468 ( 26 S. E. 2d 755 ), and the cases there cited.
cited
Cited "see"
Parsons v. Grant
See Edmiston v. Whitney Land Co., 198 Ga. 546, 549 ( 32 S. E. 2d 259 ), Anderson v. State, 196 Ga. 468, 471 ( 26 S. E. 2d 755 ), and Howard v. Lee, 208 Ga. 735, 739 ( 69 S. E. 2d 263 ).
Nealy
v.
Mount, Sheriff.
v.
Mount, Sheriff.
14538..
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jun 12, 1943.
BELL, Presiding Justice..
Published
This case is controlled by the decision in King v. Mount, ante.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.