Prada v. Adm'r, Small Bus. Admin., 432 S.E.2d 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Prada v. Adm'r, Small Bus. Admin., 432 S.E.2d 274 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Cochran v. State (gactapp, 2003-01-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Cochran v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 2003 · confidence medium
See State v. Litz, 210 Ga. App. 200 ( 435 SE2d 724 ) (1993); Blankenship v. State, 208 Ga. App. 710, 711 ( 431 SE2d 481 ) (1993); State v. Scoggins, 196 Ga. App. 781 ( 397 SE2d 50 ) (1990).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Smith v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 1999 · confidence medium
And under OCGA § 17-7-71 (a), an accusation need not be supported by an affidavit if the defendant has been previously arrested “in conjunction with the transaction charged in the accusation,” which was the case here. 1 See Blankenship v. State, 208 Ga. App. 710, 711 ( 431 SE2d 481 ) (1993). 3.
discussed Cited "see" Brown v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
Martin, Solicitor, Evelyn P. Sandefur, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee. 1 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 2 Hight v. State, 221 Ga. App. 574 -575 (1) ( 472 SE2d 113 ) (1996). 3 Hight, supra at 575 (1). 4 Camp v. State, 181 Ga. App. 714 ( 353 SE2d 832 ) (1987). 5 Jackson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 260, 261 ( 511 SE2d 615 ) (1999); see Knight v. State, 239 Ga. App. 710, 713 (2) ( 521 SE2d 851 ) (1999). 6 Jackson, supra. 7 OCGA § 15-7-4 (a) (1). 8 OCGA § 16-11-39 (b). 9 Dukes v. State, 224 Ga. App. 305, 306 ( 480 SE2d 340 ) (1997). 10 Id. 11 See also Blankenship v. State, 208 Ga. …
Prada
v.
Administrator, Small Business Administration
A93A0117.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
May 25, 1993.
432 S.E.2d 274
Humberto 0. Prada, pro se., Lawson & Davis, James H. Baskin, for appellee.
Blackburn, Johnson, Smith.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
Blackburn, Judge.

This is an appeal from a dispossessory action in which a Writ of Possession was ordered on behalf of appellee, Administrator, Small Business Administration (SBA), against appellant, Humberto Prada. The SBA obtained a dispossessory warrant on June 29, 1992, and a trial was held, without a jury, on July 22, 1992 in the State Court of DeKalb County. Prada, appealing pro se, asserts several enumerations of error all raising general grounds. “However, no transcript of the proceeding is present in the record before us. ‘Where no transcript of evidence is filed all grounds requiring a consideration of evidence must be affirmed. [Cit.]’ [Cit.]” Southerland v. Oxford Group, 162 Ga. App. 213 (290 SE2d 556) (1982). See also P. H. L. Dev. Corp. v. Smith, 174 Ga. App. 328 (329 SE2d 545) (1985).

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson and Smith, JJ., concur.