green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brinkley v. State
See McGill v. State, 209 Ga. 282, 282 ( 71 SE2d 548 ) (1952) (“An application of unquestioned and unambiguous constitutional provisions to a given state of facts is within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allen v. State
See McGill v. State of Ga., 209 Ga. 282 ( 71 SE2d 548 ); Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes, 215 Ga. 324 ( 110 SE2d 343 ); and Edwards v. State, 217 Ga. 804 ( 125 SE2d 506 ) and the cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlanta Newspapers, Inc. v. Grimes
See, in this connection, McGill v. State of Georgia, 209 Ga. 282 ( 71 S. E. 2d 548 ); Jackson v. State, 203 Ga. 570 ( 47 S. E. 2d 588 ); Gaines v. State, 205 Ga. 210 ( 52 S. E. 2d 847 ); Boyett v. State, 205 Ga. 370 (53 E.
Jarrard Et Al.
v.
Wildes
v.
Wildes
17927.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jul 15, 1952.
Bennett, Pedrick & Bennett, for plaintiffs in error.
Duckworth, Atkinson.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Neither the application for the processioning of an alleged disputed land line nor the protest thereto make a case “respecting title to land,” nor does the case otherwise come within the jurisdiction of this court, and, accordingly, it must be transferred to the Court of Appeals. Code (Ann.), §§ 2-3704, 2-3708; Elkins v. Merritt, 146 Ga. 647 (92 S. E. 51); Pearre v. Wilkinson, 181 Ga. 619 (183 S. E. 626); Edenfield v. Lanier, 203 Ga. 348 (46 S. E. 2d, 582); Ledford v. Hill, 206 Ga. 304 (57 S. E. 2d, 77).
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.