Ward v. State, 159 S.E.2d 84 (Ga. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Ward v. State, 159 S.E.2d 84 (Ga. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Quakenbush v. Quakenbush (ga, 1973-05-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Quakenbush v. Quakenbush (2×)
Ga. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ward v. State, 223 Ga. 864 ( 159 SE2d 84 ); Bonaparte v. State, 223 Ga. 648 (1) ( 157 SE2d 272 ), and *651 cits.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Ayers v. Yancey Brothers Co.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Harrington v. Frye, 116 Ga. App. 755, 756 ( 159 SE2d 84 ); Watson v. Elberton-Elbert County Hospital Authority, 229 Ga. 26, 27 ( 189 SE2d 66 ).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Supreme Oil Co. v. Brock
Ga. Ct. App. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Harrington v. Frye, 116 Ga. App. 755 ( 159 SE2d 84 ). 2.
Ward
v.
the State
24418.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jan 4, 1968.
159 S.E.2d 84
Stanley H. Nylen, for appellant., Lewis R. Slaton, Solicitor General, Amber W. Anderson, Jess Watson, J. Walter LeCraw, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Marion 0. Gordon, Mathew Robbins, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Frankum.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Frankum, Justice.

Clifford Richard Ward was convicted of murder with a recommendation of mercy and sentenced to servitude in the penitentiary for life. He appealed from the overruling of his motion for a new trial, the conviction and sentence. In his third enumeration of error, which is the only one argued and insisted upon, appellant contends that the court erred by failing to charge the jury without request on the law relating to the impeachment of witnesses. “In the absence of a timely written request it is not error to fail to charge the law with respect to contradictory evidence or with respect to the impeachment of witnesses.” Bonaparte v. State, 223 Ga. 648 (1) (157 SE2d 272).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.