Mize v. Rampey, 164 S.E.2d 816 (Ga. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Mize v. Rampey, 164 S.E.2d 816 (Ga. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Evans v. Just Open Government (ga, 1979-01-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Evans v. Just Open Government (2×)
Ga. · 1979 · confidence medium
Accord, Peters v. Boggs, 217 Ga. 471, 473 ( 123 SE 258 ) (1961); Maddox v. Coogler, 224 Ga. 806, 809 ( 165 SE2d 158 ) (1968).
cited Cited "see" Terminal Transport Co. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.
Ga. Ct. App. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mize v. Rampey, 224 Ga. 806 ( 164 SE2d 816 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." LATHROP v. DEAL, GOVERNOR (3×)
Ga. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Maddox v. Coogler, 224 Ga. 806, 808-809 ( 165 SE2d 158 ) (1968) (suit to enjoin members of state Mineral Leasing Commission from executing leases of state properties pursuant to allegedly unconstitutional statutes); Peters v. Boggs, 217 Ga. 471, 473-475 (2) ( 123 SE2d 258 ) (1961) (suit to enjoin allegedly unconstitutional appropriations of public funds for the support of desegregated schools); Ramsey, 181 Ga. at 377 (suit to enjoin disbursement and expenditure of public funds under allegedly unconstitutional appropriations act).
examined Cited "see, e.g." Lathrop v. Deal (3×)
Ga. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., Maddox v. Coogler, 224 Ga. 806, 808-809 ( 165 SE2d 158 ) (1968) (suit to enjoin members of state Mineral Leasing Commission from executing leases of state properties pursuant to allegedly unconstitutional statutes); Peters v. Boggs, 217 Ga. 471, 473-475 (2) ( 123 SE2d 258 ) (1961) (suit to enjoin allegedly unconstitutional appropriations of public funds for the support of desegregated schools); Ramsey, 181 Ga. at 377 (suit to enjoin disbursement and expenditure of public funds under allegedly unconstitutional appropriations act).
MIZE
v.
RAMPEY Et Al.; And Vice Versa
24928, 24929.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 21, 1968.
164 S.E.2d 816
J. T. Sisk, Walton Hardin, for appellant., Grant cfc Matthews, John C. Walden, for appellees.
Duckworth.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Duckworth, Chief Justice.

Both the appeal and cross appeal are from judgments which would have been final if rendered as claimed by the appellant and cross appellant. However, the lower court did not certify within 10 days of the judgments here appealed from authorizing an “immediate review” as now required in such cases by Code Ann. § 6-701 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; as amended April 8, 1968, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073). See Goldberg v. Monroe, 224 Ga. 694 (164 SE2d 123). Accordingly, since the appeals are both premature, we have no alternative but to dismiss them.

Appeal and cross appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.