Wise v. Georgia State Bd. for Examination, Qualification & Reg. of Architects, 260 S.E.2d 477 (Ga. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Wise v. Georgia State Bd. for Examination, Qualification & Reg. of Architects, 260 S.E.2d 477 (Ga. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kimberly K. Sisia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (ca11, 2023-04-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Kimberly K. Sisia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
11th Cir. · 2023 · confidence medium
Wise v. Ga. State Bd. for Examination, Qualification & Registration of Architects, 244 Ga. 449, 449 (1979) (quotation omitted). 4 Here the medical expenses claim remained pending until Sisia voluntarily dismissed it.
cited Cited "see" Kennedy, Jr. v. Najarian Capital, LLC
Bankr. N.D. Ga. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wise v. Georgia State Bd. for Examination, Qualification & Registration of Architects, 244 Ga. 449, 449 (1979) (citing Walker v. Robinson, 232 Ga. 361 (1974)).
discussed Cited "see" Dynomite Marketing, LLC v. Dowd
Bankr. N.D. Ga. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wise v. Georgia State Bd. for Examination, Qualification & Registration of Architects, 244 Ga. 449, 449 (1979) (citing Walker v. Robinson, 232 Ga. 361 (1974)) (“The entry of a judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims . . . is not a final judgment . . . and lacks res judicata effect unless the trial court makes an express direction for the entry of the final judgment and a determination that no just reason for delaying the finality of the judgment exists.”).
discussed Cited "see" Jenkins v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pa. (2×)
N.D. Ga. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wise v. Georgia State Board for Examination, Qualification and Registration of Architects, 244 Ga. 449 , 260 S.E.2d 477 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Georgia Farm Buildings, Inc. v. Willard (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wise v. Ga. State Bd. &c. of Architects, 244 Ga. 449 ( 260 SE2d 477 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mays v. Rancine-Kinchen (2×)
Ga. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Wise v. Georgia State Bd. for Examination, Qualification and Registration of Architects, 244 Ga. 449 ( 260 SE2d 477 ) (1979) (order sustaining the dismissal of two counts of a complaint was not final; certification and application was required for appellate review).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Re-Max Executives, Inc. v. Wallace (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Corp. of America, 192 Ga. App. 628 ( 385 SE2d 731 ), cert. den. 192 Ga. App. 902 ; Spivey v. Rogers, 167 Ga. App. 729 ( 307 SE2d 677 ); Davis v. Roper, 119 Ga. App. 442 ( 167 SE2d 685 ); see also Wise v. Ga. State Bd. for Exam. &c., 244 Ga. 449 ( 260 SE2d 477 ); Patterson v. Professional Resources, 242 Ga. 459 ( 249 SE2d 248 ).
WISE
v.
GEORGIA STATE BOARD FOR EXAMINATION, QUALIFICATION AND REGISTRATION OF ARCHITECTS Et Al.
35238.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Sep 26, 1979.
260 S.E.2d 477
Trotter, Bondurant, Griffin, Miller & Hishon, Luther P. Cochrane, John F. Eiger, for appellant., King & Spalding, Joseph R. Bankoff, Mary Ann Wooten, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellees.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published
Per curiam.

John R. Wise filed an action against the Georgia State Board for Examination, Qualification and Registration of Architects and James E. Skrine in his official capacity as joint secretary of the board (hereinafter "the State”), seeking a declaration that those portions of Code § 84-303 (b) which require that he have and possess a "Council Certificate” from the National Council of Architectural Review Boards (hereinafter "NCARB”) prior to registration by reciprocity to practice architecture in Georgia be declared null and void as applied to him. NCARB was added as a party by order of the trial court, and Wise amended his complaint demanding in Count 1 that NCARB be compelled to issue to him a "Council Certificate” and demanding in Count 2 $50,000 damages from NCARB for alleged interference with his employment, career and prospective business advantage. The trial, court issued two orders dated January 3,1979, and entered January 9,1979, sustaining for unstated reasons NCARB’s motion to dismiss as to Counts 1 and 2 of Wise’s complaint. Wise appeals.

The orders sought to be appealed are not "final” within the meaning of Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) l because the cause against the state still is pending in the court below. "The entry of a judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties is not a final judgment under Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 1 and lacks res judicata effect unless the trial court make an express direction for the entry of the final judgment and a determination that no just reason for delaying the finality of the judgment exists. Code Ann. § 81A-154 (b); Walker v. Robinson, 232 Ga. 361 (207 SE2d 6) (1974); 10 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil, p. 90, § 2661 (1973).” (Emphasis supplied.) Culwell v. Lomas & Nettleton Co., 242 Ga. 242, 243 (248 SE2d 641) (1978). No certification has been obtained from the trial court pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2 (A). Neither has application been made to this court pursuant to Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2. The orders[*450] sought to be appealed do not fall within any of the enumerated exceptions set forth in Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 3. so as to be appealable despite lack of finality and lack of certification and application. Neither does the record contain a determination and direction of the trial court pursuant to Code Ann. § 81A-154 (b) in this multiparty, multiclaim litigation. Cf. Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wall, 242 Ga. 176 (249 SE2d 588) (1978). The appeal must be dismissed. Duvall v. Baker, 244 Ga. 228 (1979).

Argued September 12, 1979 Decided September 26, 1979 Rehearing denied October 16, 1979. Trotter, Bondurant, Griffin, Miller & Hishon, Luther P. Cochrane, John F. Eiger, for appellant. King & Spalding, Joseph R. Bankoff, Mary Ann Wooten, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.