green
Positive treatment
13.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Greenway
(2×)
But see Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 624 , 284 S.E.2d 422, 430 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 919 , 102 S.Ct. 1778 , 72 L.Ed.2d 180 (1982) (where each murder conviction was aggravated by the other murder conviction, the court found them "mutually supporting", and "arbitrarily" eliminated one of the death sentences).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Langlands v. State
A defendant who procures the setting aside of a judgment against him generally “ ‘may be tried anew . . . upon another indictment, for the same offense of which he hadbeen convicted.’ [Cit.]” Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 618 (1) ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981) (quoting Ball v. United States, 163 U. S. 662 (16 SC 1192, 41 LE 300) (1896)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McMichen v. State
The case was orally argued on February 13, 1995. 5 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 6 Strickland, 247 Ga. at 228 . 7 Id. at 232 . 8 Id. at 230 ; OCGA § 17-10-30 (b) (2). 9 Strickland, 247 Ga. at 230. 10 Id. at 232. 11 Id. 12 Id. at 778. 13 Id. at 782. 14 Id. at 784. 15 Id. at 783. 16 Id. at 785 (Weltner, J., concurring specially). 17 Wilson v. State, 250 Ga. 630, 638 ( 300 SE2d 640 ) (1983). 18 See, e.g., Burden v. State, 250 Ga. 313, 316 ( 297 SE2d 242 ) (1982); Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 625 ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981); Waters v. State, 248 Ga. 355, 368 (…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Morgan v. State
However, this argument has been decided adversely to the defendant by the United States Supreme Court in Poland v. Arizona, supra, as well as by this court in Zant v. Redd, supra. See also Page v. State, 257 Ga. 538 ( 361 SE2d 153 ) (1987); Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 618 ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Page v. State
Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 618 ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981); Zant v. Redd, 249 Ga. 211 ( 290 SE2d 36 ) (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Godfrey v. Francis
(2×)
I dissent to the imposition of the death penalty in this case for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 625 ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Padgett v. State
At the close of all the evidence the trial court instructed the jury that the defendant had raised the issue of insanity and that if they determined the defendant was insane at the time of the commission of the crime, “the law of this State declares that [the defendant] shall not be convicted of any crime.” In Waters v. State, 248 Ga. 355, 363 ( 283 SE2d 238 ) (1981), this court noted that “[v]oir dire should allow both parties an opportunity to ascertain the ability of the prospective jurors to decide the case on its merits, with objectivity and freedom from bias and prior inclination. …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Young v. State
(2×)
Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 625 (dissenting opinion by Hill, P. J.) ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981), cert. denied 456 U. S. 919 (1982).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Burden v. State
Waters v. State, 248 Ga. 355, 368 (12) ( 283 SE2d 238 ) (1981); Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 624-25 ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Waye v. State
State v. Martin, 173 Ga. App. 370, 371 ( 326 SE2d 558 ) (1985); OCGA §§ 16-1-6, 16-1-7, 16-1-8; see Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 619 ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Marshall
(2×)
See Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616 , 284 S.E.2d 422, 430 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cooper
(2×)
See Godfrey v. Georgia, 248 Ga. 616 , 284 S.E.2d 422 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 919 , 102 S.Ct. 1778 , 72 L.Ed.2d 180 (1982), reh'g denied, 456 U.S. 1001 , 102 S.Ct. 2286 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1296 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spraggins v. State
(2×)
See Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616 (1) ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Godfrey v. Francis
See Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 618 , 284 S.E.2d 422 (1981). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Whalen v. State
See, Godfrey v. State, Ga. Supr., 248 Ga. 616 , 284 S.E.2d 422 (1981); Stevens v. State, Ga.Supr., 245 Ga. 583 , 266 S.E.2d 194, 196 (1980); Burger v. State, Ga.Supr., 245 Ga. 458 , 265 S.E.2d 796, 798 (1980); Sprouse v. State, Ga.Supr., 242 Ga. 831 , 252 S.E.2d 173, 176 (1979); Fleming v. State, Ga.Supr., 243 Ga. 120 , 252 S.E.2d 609, 611 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
Zant v. Redd
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616 (1) ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Harris
See also Godfrey v. State, 248 Ga. 616, 618 (1) ( 284 SE2d 422 ) (1981).
MOORE
v.
WILKES
v.
WILKES
38124.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 25, 1981.
L. Z. Dozier, for appellant., Willis B. Sparks III, District Attorney, for appellee.
Published
Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59.