green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Driver v. State
Andrews, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur. 1 OCGA § 40-6-20 (a). 2 OCGA § 16-13-30 (a). 3 OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (1). 4 See Thorp v. State of Ga., 217 Ga. App. 275, 276 (1) ( 457 SE2d 234 ) (1995) (admission in appellate brief that amount of cocaine was 7.1 grams moots challenge to the State’s evidence on the amount and weight of cocaine); cf. Jackson a State, 208 Ga. App. 391, 392 (1) ( 430 SE2d 781 ) (1993) (“[o]bviously, if defendant admits that she possessed cocaine at any time within the period alleged, she would be guilty of the crime”). 5 See Bowen v. State, 235 Ga. App. 900 ( 510 SE…
CRYMES Et Al.
v.
SMITH Et Al.
v.
SMITH Et Al.
S90A1621.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 8, 1990.
Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, David H. Flint, Susan H. Sarch, for appellants., Albert Sidney Johnson, for appellees.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
The present appeal from the denial of mandamus involves judicial review of an administrative decision of the local board of zoning appeals. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) requires an application to appeal such a review whether the review is brought by mandamus or otherwise. Since an application to appeal was not filed, the appeal must be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.