Carlisle v. State, 635 S.E.2d 282 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Carlisle v. State, 635 S.E.2d 282 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stewart v. State (gactapp, 2007-06-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Stewart v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
See Berry v. State, 268 Ga. 437, 438 (1) ( 490 SE2d 389 ) (1997); King v. State, 268 Ga. App. 707, 709 ( 603 SE2d 54 ) (2004). 4 See Ibekilo v. State, 277 Ga. App. 384, 386-387 (3) ( 626 SE2d 592 ) (2006); Johnson v. State, 281 Ga. App. 7, 8-9 (1) ( 635 SE2d 278 ) (2006). 5 (Punctuation omitted.) Barrow v. State, 269 Ga. App. 635, 639 (7) ( 605 SE2d 67 ) (2004). 6 Sidwell v. State, 269 Ga. App. 38, 40 (2) ( 603 SE2d 467 ) (2004). 7 See id. 8 (Punctuation omitted.) Orr v. State, 281 Ga. 112, 113 (2) ( 636 SE2d 505 ) (2006). 9 See Ingram v. State, 178 Ga. App. 292, 293-294 (2) ( 342 SE2d 765 ) (…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Daugherty v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
Johnson v. State, 281 Ga. App. 7, 9 (2) ( 635 SE2d 278 ) (2006).
discussed Cited "see" Mamadou Lamine Sambou v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
And indeed, he is correct that “[i]n recidivist sentencing, the State bears the burden of showing both the existence of the prior guilty pleas and that the defendant was represented by counsel when he entered the pleas.”15 But Georgia’s appellate courts have also “held that a defendant can waive a claim that such a prior conviction is invalid because the defendant was 14 Nelson v. State, 277 Ga. App. 92, 99 (5) ( 625 SE2d 465 ) (2005) (punctuation omitted), disapproved of on other grounds by Nordahl v. State, 306 Ga. 15 ( 829 SE2d 99 ) (2019); see Johnson v. State, 281 Ga. App. 7, 10 (…
cited Cited "see" White v. State
Ga. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Johnson v. State, 281 Ga. App. 7, 8-9 (1) ( 635 SE2d 278 ) (2006) (jury entitled to disbelieve defendant’s claim that pants containing contraband in the pocket did not belong to him).
CARLISLE
v.
State
A05A1128.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Aug 4, 2006.
635 S.E.2d 282
Brian Steel, for appellant., Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, David K. Keeton, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Blackburn.
Published
BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

In State v. Carlisle,[1] the Supreme Court of Georgia, reversing Division 2 of the judgment of this Court in Carlisle v. State,2 held that Janice Marie Carlisle’s conviction for aggravated stalking was authorized by the evidence. The Supreme Court did not address or disturb the ruling of this Court in Division 1 in which we affirmed Carlisle’s conviction for stalking. Therefore, we vacate Division 2 of our earlier opinion and adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own. Accordingly, both of Carlisle’s convictions for stalking and for aggravated stalking are affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Miller and Bernes, JJ., concur.
1

State v. Carlisle, 280 Ga. 770 (631 SE2d 347) (2006).

2

Carlisle v. State, 273 Ga. App. 567, 571-573 (2) (615 SE2d 543) (2005).