green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
33.0 score
“t is the role of the jury to resolve conflicts in the evidence and to determine the credibility of witnesses, and the resolution of such conflicts adversely to the defendant does not ren- der the evidence insufficient.”
Treatment trajectory · 2017 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2017
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Mack v. State
t is the role of the jury to resolve conflicts in the evidence and to determine the credibility of witnesses, and the resolution of such conflicts adversely to the defendant does not ren- der the evidence insufficient.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Allen v. State
(2×)
Nor was the verdict ‘decidedly and strongly against the weight of the evidence.’ OCGA § 5-5-21.” The court also stated that 5 OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21, respectively, allow the trial court to grant a new trial “[i]n any case when the verdict of a jury is found contrary to evidence and the principles of justice and equity,” or when “the verdict may be decidedly and strongly against the weight of the evidence even though there may appear to be some slight evidence in favor of the finding.” “Grounds for a new trial under these Code sections are commonly known as the ‘general …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Rogers v. State
(2×)
See Martin v. State, 306 Ga. 538, 541 ( 832 SE2d 402 ) (2019) (“The jury, as the sole arbiter of witness credibility, was entitled to discredit [defendant’s exculpatory] testimony . . . .”); Donaldson v. State, 302 Ga. 671, 673 ( 808 SE2d 720 ) (2017) (“[I]t is the role of the jury to resolve conflicts in the evidence and to determine the credibility of witnesses, and the resolution of such conflicts adversely to the defendant does not render the evidence insufficient.”) (citation and punctuation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis Leon Rozier v. State
See Donaldson v. State, 302 Ga. 671, 674-675 (4) ( 808 SE2d 720 ) (2017) 11 (viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether two shots fired at a victim were part of a single incident for purposes of merging convictions on two aggravated assault counts into felony murder conviction for sentencing purposes).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chappuis v. Ortho Sport & Spine Physicians Savannah, LLC.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Ortho Sport , 344 Ga. App. at 235 , 808 S.E.2d 559 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraser v. State
See also Donaldson v. State, 302 Ga. 671, 674 (2017) (addressing merger issues not raised by defendant and holding that “[t]he evidence (viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict) showed that the two shots were fired back to back as part of a single incident, and so the two aggravated assault counts both should have merged into felony murder for sentencing purposes”) (cleaned up); Jeffrey v. State, 296 Ga. 713, 718 (2015) (“Because there was no evidence that the shooting occurred in a 22 manner other than in a single transaction, with no ‘deliberate interval’ separating any o…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McCULLOUGH v. State
See also Donaldson v. State, 302 Ga. 671, 674-675 ( 808 SE2d 720 ) (2017).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McCullough v. State
See also Donaldson v. State , 302 Ga. 671 , 674-675, 808 S.E.2d 720 (2017).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
DIXON v. THE STATE (Two Cases)
See id. at 486-487 (2) (b); see also Donaldson v. State, 302 Ga. 671, 674 (4) ( 808 SE2d 720 ) 12 (2017).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dixon v. State
See id. at 486-487 (2) (b); see also Donaldson v. State, 302 Ga. 671, 674 (4) ( 808 SE2d 720 ) (2017).
IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL BERNARD KING
S17Y1470.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Dec 4, 2017.
Paula J. Frederick, General Counsel State Bar, Jonathan W. Hewett, Jenny K. Mittelman, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.
Published
The Court having reviewed the Notice of Compliance submitted by the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia, and it appearing that Michael Bernard King has appeared for and received a public reprimand as ordered by this Court (see In the Matter of King, 301 Ga. 791 (804 SE2d 116) (2017)), it is hereby ordered that Michael Bernard King be reinstated to practice law in the State of Georgia.
Reinstated.