neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.4 score
E. D. Mahone, in error
v.
T. D. Perkinson, in error
v.
T. D. Perkinson, in error
Lester, for plaintiff in error., Hansell and Bleckley; for defendant.
Walker.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons that the judgment was incorrectly entered np, Code, sec. 3241; and the Court had the power, and it was his duty, to amend the judgment and execution, so as to make them conform to the legal effect of the verdict: Sections 3424-5.