Clark v. State, 150 S.E. 651 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929). · Go Syfert
Search
Clark v. State, 150 S.E. 651 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
CLARK
v.
State
19994.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Nov 12, 1929.
150 S.E. 651
M. B. Huíanles, Norman Shattuclc, for plaintiff in error., M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, contra.
Bloodworth.
Published
Bloodworth, J.

This case is controlled by the principle announced in Cummings v. State, 25 Ga. App. 427 (103 S. E. 687), and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial. See Turner v. State, 25 Ga. App. 234 (102 S. E. 847); Kennedy v. State, 23 Ga. App. 141 (97 S. E. 894); Reeves v. State, 23 Ga. App. 9 (97 S. E. 263).

As a new trial must follow the foregoing ruling, it is unnecessary to pass upon the allegéd errors referred to in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles; C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.