green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1934 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1934
1980
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Blair v. Rayburn
Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga. App. 399 ( 106 SE 297 ); Harris v. Reid, 30 Ga. App. 187 ( 117 SE 256 ); Peavy v. Peavy, 30 Ga. App 202 ( 136 SE 96 ); Lee v. Lott, 50 Ga. App. 39, 42 ( 177 SE 92 ).” Capers v. Martin, 54 Ga. App. 555 (1) ( 188 SE 465 ). 2.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Howell v. Amerson
Lee v. Lott, 50 Ga. App. 39, 48 ( 177 SE 92 ); Sheffield v. Studor, 50 Ga. App. 429 ( 178 SE 409 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hamby v. Hamby
(2×)
Co. v. Harper, 32 Ga. App. 267 ( 123 S. E. 154 )." Lee v. Lott, 50 Ga. App. 39, 43 ( 177 S. E. 92 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Caskey v. Underwood
(2×)
For the origin of the rule, see the cases cited in Slaton v. Hall, supra, and in Lee v. Lott, 50 Ga. App. 39, 42 ( 177 S. E. 92 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Moore v. Shirley
“One riding by invitation and gratuitously in another’s automobile can not recover for injury caused by the other’s negligence in driving, unless it amounted to gross negligence.” Epps v. Parrish, 26 Ga. App. 399 ( 106 S. E. 297 ); Harris v. Reid, 30 Ga. App. 187 ( 117 S. E. 256 ); Peavy v. Peavy, 36 Ga. App. 202 ( 136 S. E. 96 ); Lee v. Lott, 50 Ga. App. 39, 42 ( 177 S. E. 92 ); Atlantic Ice & Coal Cor. v. Newlin, 56 Ga. App. 428 ( 192 S. E. 915 ). 2.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hopkins v. Sipe
Slaton v. Hall, supra.” Bolton v. Bluestein, supra. “While in foreign States the weight of authority is that the duty of the owner or driver of an automobile to a guest is to exercise ordinary or reasonable care in its operation, and not unreasonably to expose him to danger by increasing the hazard of the method of travel, and must exercise the care and diligence which a man of reasonable prudence, engaged in the same business, would exercise for his own protection and the protection of his family and property, a care which must be reasonably commensurate with the nature and hazards attend…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bolton v. Bluestein
While in foreign 'States the weight of authority is that the duty of the owner or driver of an automobile to a guest is to exercise ordinary or reasonable care in its operation, and not unreasonably to expose him to danger by increasing the hazard of the method of travel, and must exercise the care and diligence which a man of reasonable prudence, engaged in the same business, would exercise for his own protection and the protection of his family and property, a care which must be reasonably commensurate with the nature and hazards attending the particular travel, s and, failing in this duty, …
cited
Cited "see"
Zerbe v. State
See Lee v. Lott, 50 Ga.App. 39 , 177 S.E. 92 (1934); Note, 13 N.C.L.Rev. 497 ‘(1935).
cited
Cited "see"
Tucker v. Andrews
See, in this connection, Lee v. Lolt, 50 Ga. App. 39 ( 177 S. E. 92 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waggoner v. Bevich
See also Lee v. Lott, 50 Ga. App. 39 ( 177 SE 92 ) for a discussion of the difference between acts constituting "gross negligence” and "wilfulness and wantonness.” In a case where a guest passenger rides with a driver known to him to have been imbibing intoxicants, it is proper for the judge to charge the jury on the principles of comparative negligence and contributory negligence.
Moore, alias Grier
v.
State
v.
State
24106.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Oct 26, 1934.
J. A. Mitchell, P. II. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error., J. Cecil Davis, solicitor-general, contra.
MacIntyre.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
It is error to refuse a new trial on an indictment containing two counts, the first charging that the defendant carried a pistol concealed, and the second that he carried a pistol without a license, where upon the trial the evidence authorizes a conviction under the second count only and the verdict is a general verdict of guilty. Simmons v. State, 162 Ga. 316 (134 S. E. 54).
Judgment reversed.