Read v. Williams, 22 S.E. 213 (Ga. 1894). · Go Syfert
Search
Read v. Williams, 22 S.E. 213 (Ga. 1894). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jett v. Norris (gactapp, 1974-12-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1904 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1904 1965 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jett v. Norris (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1974 · confidence medium
Holding to the same effect, see Reed v. Southern Exp., 95 Ga. 108, 110 ( 22 SE 133 ), where it is held: "But if they [domestic animals] are wrongfully in the place where they do the mischief, the owner is liable, though he had no notice that they were accustomed to do so before." 1 Am. & Eng.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Wilson Leasing Co. v. Seaway Pharmacal Corp. (2×)
Mich. Ct. App. · 1974 · confidence medium
See Springstead v Crawfordsville State Bank, 231 US 541, 542 ; 34 S Ct 195 ; 58 L Ed 354, 356 (1913); Federal Land Bank of Berkely v Warner, 42 Ariz 201, 206; 23 P2d 563, 565 (1933); Cirimele v Shinazy, 124 Cal App 2d 46, 53; 268 P2d 210, 214 (1954); Almand v Almand, 95 Ga 204, 206; 22 SE 213, 214 (1894); Parks v Granger, 96 Miss 503, 506; 51 So 716, 717 (1910); Letcher v Wrightsman, 60 Okla 14, 15; 158 P 1152, 1153 (1916); Lackawanna Thrift & Loan Corp v Kabatchnick, 145 Pa Super 52, 54; 20 A2d 903, 904 (1941); Warder, Bushnell & Glessner Co v Raymond, 7 SD 451 , 454; 64 NW 525, 526 (1895); A…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) McCree v. Burks
Ga. Ct. App. · 1973 · confidence medium
Reed v. Southern Express Co., 95 Ga. 108, 110 [ 22 SE 133 , 51 ASR 62]; Browder-Manget Co. v. Calhoun Brick Co., 138 Ga. 277 ( 75 SE 243 ); Cooper v. Layson Bros., 14 Ga. App. 134 ( 80 SE 666 ); Wright v. Turner, 35 Ga. App. 241 ( 132 SE 650 ).” Chandler v. Gately, 119 Ga. App. 513, 518 ( 167 SE2d 697 ).
Read
v.
Williams, for use, etc.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Nov 12, 1894.
22 S.E. 213
Frazer & Hynds, for plaintiff in error., Calhoun, King & Spalding, contra.
Atkinson.
Published
Atkinson, Justice.

The issue involved in this case being controlled by the principles declared in the case of Ward v. Barnes, sheriff, et al., decided at this term, no opinion or statement of facts, further than as stated in the head-notes, is necessary. Judgment reversed.