Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 92
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 92-13 (2026)

  Penalties

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §92-13  Penalties.  Any person who wilfully violates any provisions of this part shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, may be summarily removed from the board unless otherwise provided by law. [L 1975, c 166, pt of §1]

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: Civil Beat Law Ctr. for the Pub. Interest, Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 445 P.3d 47 (Haw. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Civil Beat Law Ctr. for the Pub. Interest, Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 445 P.3d 47 (Haw. 2019). · cites it 14× “Counts 1 and 2 In Counts 1 and 2, Civil Beat sought declaratory relief interpreting the Sunshine Law's open meeting requirement, HRS § 92-3, and criminal penalties provision, HRS § 92-13. In Count 1, Civil Beat alleged that the Commission misinterpreted the Sunshine Law's open…”
Kanahele v. Maui Cnty. Council., 307 P.3d 1174 (Haw. 2013). · cites it 2× “HRS § 92-13 (1993) provides that "[ajny person who willfully violates any provisions of this part shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction, may be summarily removed from the board unless otherwise provided by law.”
Civil Beat Law Ctr. for the Pub. Interest, Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu. (Haw. 2019). · cites it 13× “Counts 1 and 2 In Counts 1 and 2, Civil Beat sought declaratory relief interpreting the Sunshine Law’s open meeting requirement, HRS § 92-3, and criminal penalties provision, HRS § 92-13. In Count 1, Civil Beat alleged that the Commission misinterpreted the Sunshine Law’s open…”
Keahi v. Chang (Haw. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “There, the plaintiff sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the City and County of Honolulu and its Police Commission, including "declaratory relief interpreting the Sunshine Law's open meeting requirement, HRS § 92-3, and criminal penalties provision, HRS § 92-13."…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.