Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 92F-2 (2026)

] Purposes; rules of construction

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     [§92F-2]  Purposes; rules of construction.  In a democracy, the people are vested with the ultimate decision-making power.  Government agencies exist to aid the people in the formation and conduct of public policy.  Opening up the government processes to public scrutiny and participation is the only viable and reasonable method of protecting the public's interest.  Therefore the legislature declares that it is the policy of this State that the formation and conduct of public policy--the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies--shall be conducted as openly as possible.

     The policy of conducting government business as openly as possible must be tempered by a recognition of the right of the people to privacy, as embodied in section 6 and section 7 of article I of the constitution of the state of Hawaii.

     This chapter shall be applied and construed to promote its underlying purposes and policies, which are to:

     (1)  Promote the public interest in disclosure;

     (2)  Provide for accurate, relevant, timely, and complete government records;

     (3)  Enhance governmental accountability through a general policy of access to government records;

     (4)  Make government accountable to individuals in the collection, use, and dissemination of information relating to them; and

     (5)  Balance the individual privacy interest and the public access interest, allowing access unless it would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. [L 1988, c 262, pt of §1]

 

Law Journals and Reviews

 

  2013 Law and Administrative Rules Governing Appeal Procedures of Hawaii's Office of Information Practices.  36 UH L. Rev. 271 (2014).

 

Case Notes

 

  Cited:  134 H. 181, 339 P.3d 679 (2014).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2021 · leading case: Peer News LLC v. City of Honolulu & Dep't of Budget & Fiscal Servs., 431 P.3d 1245 (Haw. 2018).
Peer News LLC v. City of Honolulu & Dep't of Budget & Fiscal Servs., 431 P.3d 1245 (Haw. 2018). · cites it 28× “" (Quoting HRS § 92F-2 (2012).) Civil Beat further contended that the UIPA's legislative history indicates that the legislature made a purposeful decision not to adopt a deliberative process privilege, which at the time of the UIPA's enactment was codified in both federal law…”
Civil Beat Law Ctr. for the Pub. Interest, Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 445 P.3d 47 (Haw. 2019). · cites it 2× “See HRS § 92F-2. It provides "that the formation and conduct of public policy-the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies-shall be conducted as openly as possible.”
Peer News LLC v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu., 376 P.3d 1 (Haw. 2016). “” HRS § 92F-2 (1993). However, the “policy of conducting government business as openly as possible must be tempered by a recognition of the right of the people to privacy.”
Civil Beat Law Ctr. for the Pub. Interest, Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu. (Haw. 2019). · cites it 2× “See HRS § 92F-2. It provides “that the formation and conduct of public policy - the discussions, deliberations, decisions, and action of government agencies - shall be conducted as openly as possible.”
In re: Off. of Info. Practices Opinion Letter No. F19-04., 501 P.3d 304 (Haw. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “" HRS § 92F-2 (2012). By default, government records6 are open to public inspection.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 92F-2(5) — 1 case
Peer News LLC v. City of Honolulu & Dep't of Budget & Fiscal Servs., 431 P.3d 1245 (Haw. 2018). “" (Quoting HRS § 92F-2 (2012).) Civil Beat further contended that the UIPA's legislative history indicates that the legislature made a purposeful decision not to adopt a deliberative process privilege, which at the time of the UIPA's enactment was codified in both federal law…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.