Idaho Code § 41-1329
Unfair claim settlement practices.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Unfair claim settlement practices.
Pursuant to section 41-1302, Idaho Code, committing or performing any of the following acts or omissions intentionally, or with such frequency as to indicate a general business practice shall be deemed to be an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance:
(1) Misrepresenting pertinent facts or insurance policy provisions relating to coverages at issue;
(2) Failing to acknowledge and act reasonably promptly upon communications with respect to claims arising under insurance policies;
(3) Failing to adopt and implement reasonable standards for the prompt investigation of claims arising under insurance policies;
(4) Refusing to pay claims without conducting a reasonable investigation based upon all available information;
(5) Failing to affirm or deny coverage of claims within a reasonable time after proof of loss statements have been completed;
(6) Not attempting in good faith to effectuate prompt, fair and equitable settlements of claims in which liability has become reasonably clear;
(7) Compelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in actions brought by such insureds;
(8) Attempting to settle a claim for less than the amount to which a reasonable man would have believed he was entitled by reference to written or printed advertising material accompanying or made part of an application;
(9) Attempting to settle claims on the basis of an application which was altered without notice to, or knowledge or consent of the insured;
(10) Making claims payments to insureds or beneficiaries not accompanied by a statement setting forth the coverage under which the payments are being made;
(11) Making known to insureds or claimants a policy of appealing from arbitration awards in favor of insureds or claimants for the purpose of compelling them to accept settlements or compromises less than the amount awarded in arbitration;
(12) Delaying the investigation or payment of claims by requiring an insured, claimant, or the physician of either to submit a preliminary claim report and then requiring the subsequent submission of formal proof of loss forms, both of which submissions contain substantially the same information;
(13) Failing to promptly settle claims, where liability has become reasonably clear, under one portion of the insurance policy coverage in order to influence settlements under other portions of the insurance policy coverage; or
(14) Failing to promptly provide a reasonable explanation of the basis in the insurance policy in relation to the facts or applicable law for denial of a claim or for the offer of a compromise settlement.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: White v. Unigard Mutual Insurance
White v. Unigard Mutual Insurance (1986)
“1(a), certified the following questions concerning Idaho law: (1) does the State of Idaho recognize a tort action, distinct from an action on the contract, for an insurer's bad faith in settling the first party claims of its insured; and (2) is there a private right of action…”
State of Idaho v. Bunker Hill Co. (1986)
“Idaho Code § 41-1329 Admiral contends that the claim made by the defendants based on Idaho Code § 41-1329 should be dismissed.”
Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance (2010)
“The district court instructed the jury regarding the provisions of the Idaho Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act, I.C. § 41-1329. Liberty Mutual contends that the district court erred in doing so because the instruction "improperly created a private cause of action in that the…”
Greenough v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. of Idaho (2006)
“NOTES [1] Indeed, Idaho Code § 41-1329 imposes obligations upon insurers to promptly investigate and determine their liability when claims are made.”
Greene v. Truck Insurance Exchange (1988)
“B Greene also asserts that the insurance company’s delays and inadequate offers violated I.C. § 41-1329. This statute, often called the Idaho Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act, is part of a larger statutory scheme known as the Trade Practices Law, comprising Chapter 13,…”
Reynolds v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance (1988)
“[2] Relative to I.C. § 41-1329, the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, this Court has held that the statute "does not give rise to a private right of action whereby an insured can sue an insurer for statutory violations committed in connection with the settlement of the…”
Windsor v. Guarantee Trust Life Insurance (1988)
“2d 1014 (1986), the Idaho Supreme Court held that the Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act, Idaho Code § 41-1329 (1977), does not give the insured a private right of action against the insurer.”
Pioneer Chlor Alkali Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance (1994)
“2d 1014 (1986) (construing Idaho Code § 41-1329 ). 14 In such states then, an insured could not sue for negligent claims handling unless bad faith is broad enough to encompass such acts.”
Foster v. Shore Club Lodge, Inc. (1995)
“2d 1014, 1021 (1986) (holding that statutory remedy under I.C. § 41-1329 is neither prescribed nor necessary because of availability of tort remedy).”
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Trumble (1987)
“Plaintiff presents the following evidence to prove that it has diligently processed the claim, refused payment in good faith, and to negate any inference of bad faith.”
Howard v. Blue Cross of Idaho Health Service, Inc. (1988)
“The Act, at I.C. § 41-1329, enumerates various unfair claims settlement practices, including "[c]ompelling insureds to institute litigation to recover amounts due under an insurance policy by offering substantially less than the amounts ultimately recovered in actions brought by…”
Chavez v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company (2024)
“Chavez also argues punitive damages are warranted based on Allianz’s alleged violations of Idaho’s Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act, Idaho Code § 41-1329 . Section 41-1329 lists several “[u]nfair claim settlement practices,” which when done “intentionally, or with such…”
— Idaho Code § 41-1329(7) — 1 case
Chavez v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company (2024)
“Chavez also argues punitive damages are warranted based on Allianz’s alleged violations of Idaho’s Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act, Idaho Code § 41-1329 . Section 41-1329 lists several “[u]nfair claim settlement practices,” which when done “intentionally, or with such…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.